Bill Braden

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. There are a few areas that I would like to delve into here under the power subsidy issue. The program, as outlined here, suggests that the government is going to inject about $8.3 million into subsidizing electrical power that will largely go to individual households in the diesel powered communities, Mr. Chairman. A smaller amount goes to a commercial subsidy program. I would note, Mr. Chairman, that that is a projected increase of about $1.2 million from this current year. I’m sorry; it is the same as this current year, Mr. Chairman, but this current year is $1.2...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I believe it’s in the Minister’s opening remarks that he addressed the review of the NWT Liquor Act, which we’re now engaged in over a two-year program, which will have a budget of $160,000 attached to it. Again, I would reiterate my support and my approval of reviewing this really critical piece of legislation. From my perspective, Mr. Chairman, it is far more important that we delve into this from the perspective of liquor’s impact on our society and the social consequences of it more so than the fiscal business side of it. But to the review that we’re engaging...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’ve got a couple of areas that I would like to explore. One of them is the ongoing challenge that we have to manage our debt and the plan that’s been outlined in some detail on restructuring our whole financial management situation. The other area concerns the Department of Finance’s jurisdiction over our liquor system.

Mr. Chairman, the business plans for 2005-08 and the budget document that the Minister presented last Thursday outlined a little bit of a scary situation for us on our overall debt situation. Everyone, of course, Mr. Chairman, is familiar with the...

Mr. Speaker, thank you very much. I do know -- and it's Valentine's Day so my heart is with the Premier and with the Prime Minister, too -- their promise is to see a deal that is going to mean net fiscal benefit. I've heard this from the Premier, I've heard this personally from the Prime Minister, that is where I want to go. But, Mr. Speaker, with suddenly these new demands coming from the provinces, there are many more provinces and they're a lot bigger than we are. While we have this understanding with the Prime Minister, do we also have this understanding with the provinces and are they...

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions this afternoon are to the Premier, and they relate to the amazing deal that was signed earlier today with two of the Maritime provinces on their resource sharing deals. I wanted to ask, Mr. Speaker, just what parallels are there between the deals that Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Island have and the deal that we are seeking with Ottawa for our resources? Where are the similarities? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

That will do. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. Minister.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So this is not just a one-time thing, an adjustment. It’s a new ongoing way of calculating tax. Thank you.

Thank you, Madam Chair. That will be fine.

Thank you, Madam Chair. It’s not really a very impressive list given the impact that alcohol and its abuse has across our society. A number of the things that the Minister has outlined here really are quite passive and non-interactive. A label on a bag, a label on a bottle. Is that really communicating? Is it really working with people to persuade them of the consequences of abuse and helping them to make more responsible decisions? I really think we have badly undershot the responsibility we have. If we have undertaken in the mandate that it’s the Department of Finance’s job to look after...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Further to our discussion about the liquor review which is about to really get started, by my understanding. The Minister had responded and given some of the areas that the review or act covers now and, of course, that would be contained in the review. Where I’d like to go with this question as well as in terms of the scope and how inclusive and how broad this investigation is going to go. One hundred sixty thousand dollars over two years is not a lot of money from my point of view, Madam Chair, related to the overall size of the impact of the Liquor Act. I’m wondering...