Bob Bromley

Weledeh

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Of the early childhood development and learning, the $8.243 million, the top line, I’m wondering what amount is going to the implementation of junior kindergarten.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

Again, just for my simplistic understanding here, we don’t anticipate the general amount to change over the course of those 35 years or whatever. Is that correct?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I realize the amount being contributed to Northwest Territories Housing Corporation has taken a big leap this year, from $67 million to $83 million. My understanding is that this is going towards bumping up housing in small communities outside of Yellowknife in particular. Am I correct in that understanding? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. This is a huge page, $241 million. There are probably a number of questions here, but I’ll start with a few. With the adult post-secondary education, ALBE, review that was done by the program review office and I think some of the work of the Auditor General and comments from Members, how has the ALBE work been tuned up and made more effective through those reviews and the valuation work that was implemented as a result of that? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

What I’m hearing is once you get up into the very high income bracket, you get a protection of about $1,000 and you may be paying several thousand dollars. For the rest, everybody can be protected under that very high income bracket and there would be no effect assuming we adjusted the cost of living tax credit, which would also likely benefit those people again in the high income bracket. Again, I don’t see this holding much water except to protect those in the very high income brackets that obviously don’t need the same degree of protection that we could and very obviously are serving, as we...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

As I mentioned before, this is starting to create a pattern. I’m all in favour of dilution…

---Laughter

…devolution, we all are. We want devolution for the people of the NWT, not just to the GNWT Executive. How does the Premier propose to reverse these power grabs and put oil and gas decision-making back in the realm of independent and fair public boards? If he’d like to add how we’re going to do all this public consultation instead of just saying that and creating structures that don’t have any public consultation, I’d be happy to hear that too. Mahsi.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

That’s fine. Thanks very much. Perhaps the Minister’s discussion paper on that developed in consultation with the Regular Members could be part of that. That’s all I had. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

I hope the Minister isn’t trying to be obtuse here. Obviously, the net gain would be significant and that’s what we’re aiming for is increased revenues. So what would be the actual total or what would be the income you would have to have before you would lose access to the cost of living tax credit?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

I would like to publicly commit to elevating my thinking. Boards are different from departments. Boards make decisions based on evidence that is presented to them. Departments make decisions based on politics. How can we be sure that decisions made by the new regulator will be based on evidence and not based on politics when they are made behind closed doors of the Executive? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

I’d appreciate that. Would the Minister have the information handy why we’re considering another compliance control officer for this tax collection? Thank you.