Bob Bromley

Weledeh

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I lied. I found, in the fine print, one more question.

The last few words on the page there, “the NWT electricity system analysis” is part of the energy budget here. At first blush, one might hope that we’re talking about smart read technology or smart meters, time of day pricing, hybridizing with renewables, things that would actually reduce the cost of living. But I understand, in retrospect, that in fact what we’re talking about is spending money on feasibility studies to connect the grids, especially with the southern grid so we can import dirty, coal-fired energy and...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Are those all within this $10,000 of revenue?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

That’s obviously positive in the short term and negative in the long term since we know that our health costs are growing at, well, this year 8 percent, and that’s not atypical, but it certainly does serve to cushion the increase we see in our health budget this year.

Just looking at personal income tax, again I see a very significant increase there, and again, the Minister has been on about some serious differences there. Perhaps he’s projecting that for the next fiscal year.

Again, can I get an explanation there? I see we’ve dropped in our corporate income tax here a bit as that is what we do...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I guess this raises a few questions. I know in the long-term energy options for Inuvik, wind was actually identified as one of the best, possibly the best. What are our investments in that one? I believe it was the Storm Hills as a possibility and the Reindeer Hill as another possibility.

The Whati transmission line, I know the community is most interested in developing their own hydro locally, and perhaps that fits in with the long-term here, but we have had this amount allocated to this project study of the transmission line several times in the past and it’s come to not...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

My understanding is that those dollars could be anywhere in this budget, in the expenditures in this budget. Is that correct?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I’d just like to start off here with the first line, the grant from Canada, $1.28 billion. What is the agreement going forward? I keep hearing how we’re sweating and the Minister says our population is declining; we’re losing our federal grant. It’s up considerably, I think about $90 million this year, despite our declining population.

So what’s the situation and how long is the agreement in place for and what trends can we expect to the extent that we know what’s happened? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I see again a substantial increase here. Could I just get a little summary of what that’s all about? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you for that information and I appreciate this is a five-year average. With Ms. Bisaro’s questioning, the deputy minister mentioned that adjustments would be made in the Department of Finance and reported in there. I’m wondering if we’d know what the amount of those adjustments will total.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Can the Minister at least tell us that he’s telling the Prime Minister that the lack of transparency is an issue here?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I had one more question. The budget for this division is going up about $13 million. I would like to know what proportion of that is being covered by the devolution implementation dollars. Thank you.