Bob Bromley

Weledeh

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

I’ll leave it at that for now. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Is this where we would see the Western Arctic Centre for Geomatics in Inuvik? If I can get a little explanation that way I see this centre for about exactly what that will be doing, how it will be serving our residents and maybe are we getting any federal support for that? I’d like to ask that question. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

The Minister failed to address the savings and the cost benefits of that program. They did invest money, and that’s what I’m suggesting we do instead of $20 million without getting any results.

In his ’13-14 review of income assistance, the Auditor General noted that in half of the NWT files examined, client eligibility was not confirmed. In half of the files, income was not verified. In 20 percent of the files requiring Productive Choices were not committed to, and in 30 percent of the files the participation in Productive Choices were not monitored. In one-third of the files, payments made to...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thanks to the deputy minister. That’s great to hear. I think it would be interesting to have committee become aware of the Minister’s longer term thinking on this just to see which way we’re headed. This sounds like a very reasonable first step to get all parties together and so on, but it would be interesting to know the time frames and all that sort of thing. I’m not going to take up the time here for that, but, yes, a rich area for briefings and exploration there.

My second area is I see we’re talking about putting in place a legal advisor with respect to amendments to the MVRMA, and that’s...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Thank you. That clears that up and I understand that minerals would include the aggregate resources, so that explains the quarrying revenues here. I’m a little surprised. I believe I heard the Minister or the deputy minister say that there were more substantial revenues even in this fiscal year. I’m curious about why that doesn’t show up in the revised estimate. Was it a matter of timing with respect to when this was put together? Maybe I’ll ask what that amount is up to now just so we know.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

Results from the Dauphin study showed that a guaranteed basic income lifted more people out of poverty than a welfare-based one. Over the past weeks we’ve heard the old-saw “insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting to get different results,” several times in this House. It certainly applies here.

Let’s try something new that has the promise to be effective and efficient. Let’s shift to a guaranteed basic income. Mahsi.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 68)

In the interests of time, I wonder if I could get the Minister to commit to providing committee with information from the hundreds of inspections of mineral developments operations that have been conducted since April 1st, how many variances have been found and the number of those, if any, that have been taken to court.

I’d appreciate any other relevant information. Are there any permit holders that have repeat variations from what’s permitted, and what action is being taken to follow up on that? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 66)

How do we decide, I guess, and just cut to the chase on the last part of that, how do Members know what we’re choosing to put into short-term debt? Where is the transparency there and how can the public become informed about that during the normal course of events?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 66)

Thanks for the Minister’s comments there. Perhaps there’s another way to deal with this issue. I mean, I understand Mr. Hawkins, but those are drums that are in our possession. These are drums and contaminants that are being left out on the land in remote situations that by law are, I’m sure, supposed to be cleaned up but aren’t, simply because of this mechanism that’s been removed. Perhaps there’s another way the Minister could conceive of dealing with this in another section of this department. I’ll leave it at that. I’m just raising the issue and it sounds like it’s not going to happen in...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 66)

Thanks for that information. What sorts of things are eligible for short-term debt? I assume that this is not debt that is self-servicing. It’s debt that we intend to simply pay off with revenues on the 1st of April of each fiscal year. What sorts of things would go into this? What sorts of things would we borrow under this short-term borrowing category?