Bob McLeod
Statements in Debates
Mr. Chairman, through the tools that we have which are primarily the Business Development Investment Corporation and the Department of ITI and we are still waiting to see whether the Opportunities Fund will be a tool that we can use. We work very closely with the development corporations to develop capacity. We don’t give them counselling on specific projects or specific bids, but where they come to us for capital or for loans and we counsel them on whether we think it is a viable or feasible investment. We continue to work with them on an ongoing basis. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I will be pleased to provide the Member with information on the number of employees with NTEC and with regards to an accounting of, or a reconciliation of, the numbers. We are quite open about it. We have provided this information on a regular basis to committee, and committee is well aware of what we did and it is no big secret. They dividend as they review, the team recommended that was part of what was causing the high cost of electricity. That will remain with NTEC for this year and potentially for further years.
With regards to the buy-down of the rate riders, we used money that had been...
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. There’s two parts to this funding. It’s $300,000 for polar bear and $300,000 for caribou. They have to be resident of the Northwest Territories to be able to access the funding. Also, I guess you can’t be red-flagged by this government. So if you owe the government money, then we can’t discharge the funding. It has to meet some basic criteria to access the funding. The last time I checked there was maybe four out of seven caribou outfitters that accessed the funding for caribou.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the comments. We put a very concerted effort into reducing our backlog and focusing on our workload and moving to a client service department. We require all of our employees to take client service training. I think we’re starting to see the benefits of that.
Planning long term, we know that 40 percent of our workforce will retire within the next five years so it’s something that we have to plan for.
Aboriginal governments drawing down their authorities, we are very cognizant of that and we have been looking at that, their requirements for successor rights...
Thank you, Mr. Chair. This is new to the 16th Legislative Assembly and I’ll have to go back and check our terms of reference as to whether we had identified that we would be fulfilling an annual report or not. I know that we haven’t been to date. It’s been more of a coordinating committee approach that would deal with specific projects and we would report on specific projects. Some of the main things that we’ve been working on that we will be reporting on is we will be developing and releasing an energy report that will be released in 2011. We worked on an electricity review. We’ll also be...
I’m not trying to be humorous. The money goes to local wildlife committees and it’s there to help hunters and trappers and local wildlife committees decide what form the assistance would take. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
As the Member knows, the land claims agreements reference surface rights board and when discussions on access and benefits agreements were being discussed, everybody rushed to look at the land claims agreements to see what tools were there to deal with it. Obviously we don’t have a surface rights board, we don’t have surface rights legislation. The land claims only envision arbitration if there are differences of opinion. The federal government, if they were to develop surface rights legislation, it would probably take them a couple of years at least. My understanding is that the federal...
Earlier this summer, or I should say the summer of 2010, we had the opportunity to meet with Minister Baird who was the Minister of Transportation at the time and the lead Minister on infrastructure. We met with him to follow up on a letter we had written to him requesting funding for under the Green Infrastructure Funding. We had requested funding for the Fort Providence transmission line and also for Lutselk’e in the amount of $6 million. He committed that he would take the proposal and review it very seriously, and we followed up a few times but we still haven’t received a definitive answer...
The land owners, Indian and Northern Affairs, have undertaken a scoping session or scoping work to determine the nature of the cleanup and how much it would cost to clean it up. They are moving towards cleaning up the area. The communications we’ve had with them they’ve said they’re prepared to turn over the land for the park tomorrow if we’re prepared to accept it as is and pay for the cleanup. Obviously that’s not in our best interest to do so. They’re not prepared to enforce it, we don’t have a petty trespass act to have the authority to keep anybody off federal lands, so other than to post...
Yes, I would, Mr. Chairman.