Brendan Bell

Mr. Speaker, I will certainly meet, as I periodically do, with our tourism marketing advisory committee. They are industry stakeholders, representing the tourism industry, and they’ve been tasked with identifying our business plan priorities. There are four of them this year: recreational vehicle general touring, outdoor adventure, German and Japanese markets. I will sit down and talk to them about ecotourism and outdoor adventure, make sure I understand the nuances, and if we can work to build that into their priorities, that’s something that I’m prepared to do. What they do is bring this...

That is correct. I want to make the point that we are talking about separate offices, not the same office. So physically separate offices, same employer; the Member is right. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to assure Members that we’re certainly doing what we can to support this sector. I think we can do more but, as Members will be aware, in the 2010 proposal and documents, since about 2003-2004 we’ve essentially virtually doubled the marketing money that we’re spending in tourism; the amount of money of the contribution that goes to our partner, NWTT. They are spending a lot more on marketing. One of the areas they’ve targeted, Mr. Speaker, is outdoor adventure.

I think that Members have probably by now had a chance to see the 2007 Explorer’s Guide. A nice feature...

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The purpose of this bill is to permit staff lawyers working out of different law clinics of the Legal Services Board to advise both parties in a legal matter without that being in and of itself a conflict of interest.

The Legal Services Board and department identified the need for this amendment in response to a diminishing private bar and increasing reliance on staff lawyers. This amendment is in place in other jurisdictions for the same reason: to ensure the provision of timely and quality legal service to clients. The Law Society, which regulates the legal profession...

Madam Chair, it is a good suggestion. We do have this information and we do disseminate it to realtors currently, to lawyers, to those existing condominium corporations. Unfortunately, we obviously don’t know who is intending to convert to condominium, so it is difficult for us to know. But we make the information available and also people who are interested and need more information, if they can’t find it there, they can always come to the Department of Justice. I think it is pretty widely disseminated already. Thank you.

Yes, we would like to do that. Thank you.

I do have them, if you can believe it, Madam Chair, in my other chair. So if I can go to my other chair and read the comments, I will do that and come back. Thank you.

Madam Chair, thank you. It does require that we develop some new regulations. We think we can do that before the end of this calendar year. Thank you.

Sorry; just before we go, Mr. Chairman, I wanted to make the point on the record that we looked at a number of other jurisdictions. I talked about the best case scenario where we would have enough private bar lawyers doing this type of work. We did look at some other jurisdictions that have similar models. I was hoping that maybe Mr. Aitken could provide some insight into the draft of this legislation and which of the jurisdictions we looked at.

I would, thank you.