Charles Dent

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I don’t believe so. I believe they want to do the right thing for an injured worker.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s been a significant amount of time since this issue was initially addressed by the WCB. It’s also been some time since the policies were changed. The policies the Appeals Tribunal were looking at were different. The WCB wants to make sure that they explain the current policy, which does allow for the individualization of compensation for all claimants so that that’s clearly understood. What they’re intending to do is ensure that the policies are clearly explained the way they are now, because I think it’s important to remember that they were the ones who initially...

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We are waiting for the final report from the group that we brought together in September. Sometime after we get that final report, I will sit down with my colleague. I expect that will be before the next session. I expect that, between ITI and ECE, we will be able to have some answers before the February session.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I understand it, the Financial Administration Act prohibits the Minister from providing any direction to the WCB that will impact on the accident fund. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s also important to remember that the Auditor General’s report pointed out that the Minister does not make policy. It’s the board or the Governance Council that makes policy. So the Governance Council has agreed that they are going to look at their policy. They are prepared to consult and make the changes and they have a policy in place that allows for a lifetime disability pension right now. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I always enjoy visiting the Member’s communities with him when given an opportunity to travel in the Sahtu. I would welcome the opportunity to join him in a visit to Norman Wells to address that issue in the not-too-distant future. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In the long run, what I would hope to see is a new building that would be government owned that would accommodate the classroom space that we need to provide that community and that region with the adequate training space. In the short term, I think we are prepared to consider leasing a premises or whatever. I do agree with the Member that that facility is in dire need of being replaced. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Madam Chair. I, too, would like to thank Justice John Vertes, Mr. Eddie Erasmus and Mr. Rod O'Brien for their work on this report. We can see, from reading it, that they travelled across the Northwest Territories to give voters a chance to have their say in the structure of this, the Legislative Assembly, this political institution. I agree that it's necessary for the commission to give the public an opportunity to be heard. I know it's challenging to come up with unanimous recommendations, given the competing positions advanced by members of the public, so I think it's...

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to say again that the ruling found that the policies in effect in 2001 were unfair and unconstitutional. They did not say that the policies in 2004 were. The WCB, on application from Mr. Valic, had requested that the Appeals Tribunal reconsider the hearing. At this point, I’m advised that what the WCB intends to do is to present the new policy, make sure that there’s a clear understanding or try and make sure there’s a clear understanding that indicates that compensation is available in chronic pain cases. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 14)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In the Valic case, Mr. Speaker, the policy or combination of policies that were found to be wanting by Justice Schuler were those that were in effect in 2001. Whether or not the new policy that came into effect in 2004 fails the test, that was not considered by the decision. The Governance Council though, having looked at the decision, were not certain whether or not the new policy would stand the test. They were thinking of going to the courts. They’ve changed their minds and what they had decided to do at their September meeting, they agreed that rather than appealing...