Charles Dent

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. No, I can’t. We don’t have that information. We could endeavour to have it delivered to Mr. Hawkins tomorrow.

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It’s not totally consistent with our other approaches, but we would likely wind up in the same situation as we did with social workers. If we didn’t insist on it, we would have to probably stop offering it anywhere in the Northwest Territories. We’ve been challenged to try and provide as much training as possible in the Northwest Territories. We have very few students who take this; that’s why we can’t offer all the school courses for apprentices in the Northwest Territories. We have chosen a few and we have chosen to try and make sure we offer those ones in the...

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Madam Chair. We know that it was essential to help get the industry up and going in the first instance. I’m not sure that it would be valuable now to follow up with a study as to how important it was. We don’t believe that the businesses would have gotten started here without this kind of subsidy. We know that from negotiations we had with the first people who came into the field. The fact that we do have factories that are up and polishing, now indicates, I would argue, that the program has been successful. The continued uptake of graduates from our training course also...

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The public housing subsidy money is being moved over as a first step in taking a look at the program. We thought it was better to tie all subsidies together in one area with the government. At some time in the future, we may look at splitting the department, so that you have the area that has the adult training and subsidies as one department and the early childhood and K to 12 being another department.

So this is the first step in restructuring government to put subsidies all together and allowing the Housing Corporation the opportunity to focus on a single mandate...

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The School Planning and Resource Committee, or SPARC, meets annually, at least, to review the formula and propose changes or modifications to the formula. So it is regularly reviewed. I can’t tell you when the formula was first put in place, but the membership on SPARC includes representatives from the divisional education councils. So the superintendents typically are involved in discussing the formula. Everybody knows we have a certain amount of dollars and the discussion is then how to best allocate it. That’s the committee where the decisions are recommended from.

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. There's no money in here for an addition to Mangilaluk School. I have made the offer to the community to provide some staff to work with them, to examine a small renovation to accommodate the high school. I think we agree there needs to be some accommodation to properly house high school students in that school. But, unfortunately, the student population in the community appears to be dropping. The school, at one time, was looking like it would become crowded and we did have an addition on the drawing board; but right now, school capacity is 330 and the school...

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Madam Chair. The reductions and elimination of wage subsidies to diamond manufacturing employees of $84,000 is included in there, and there’s a reallocation of salary funding. It’s an internal reallocation of $94,000 being transferred from apprenticeship to fund an existing career development officer position, because we have been able to fund one of the apprenticeship positions under the Labour Market Development Agreement. So there’s no change in the numbers of people doing the jobs, we’ve just been able to move some of our funding into a different area.

Debates of , (day 43)

Mr. Chairman, if the Member is asking about the regional distribution of the numbers, we don’t allocate the numbers by region. It’s a total allocation across the Northwest Territories and money changes. If the North Slave region doesn’t need to have as much because the economy is good, then that money doesn’t get used there, but it may get used in another region. What we have found is that different regions have different demands every year because of the economy’s fluctuations.

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I believe that, in terms of literacy funding, the only difference is the $300,000 that I mentioned earlier that has been cut from literacy funding. That funding was in a program called Workplace Literacy. It was a program that was application-based for employers to make application to provide literacy training in the workplace. It was not being accessed, so we have cut the program by the amount of funds that were being lapsed.

Debates of , (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It is an issue, I know, in some regions. For instance in the Sahtu, the caseload there only requires having one worker in the whole region. So that means that they have to go the communities. They're based in Norman Wells, and they have to get to Tulita, Deline and Colville. But given the numbers who are collecting income support in that region, that's all we can justify, because there isn't enough to keep more than that person busy. That's the situation we find in the Tlicho region, as well. If there are people who aren't being served, maybe we need to work...