Daryl Dolynny

Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

Were there any caveats to that $2.5 million in total in terms of performance, if we weren’t able to perform our duties to use that money wisely or efficiently or effectively to the betterment of the YK Centre improvement? Were there any caveats that that money would go back to the landlord?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

Because I may not be here to see the completion of this project, by what proof or performance guaranteed where 18th Assembly Regular Members are able to follow this spending and making sure that indeed the government is compliant with all the terms and conditions to the overall $2.5 million given to us? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

So, with the $1.5 million that we have before us right now, what is the intention of this money to be spent on during this fiscal year? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

So now we’ve got $1 million that won’t be spent until next year and we’re looking at an appropriation for the remaining $1.5 million to be spent in that same year. Is that the understanding? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

So, what we’ve heard today from the assistant deputy minister is that $2.5 million, not $1.5 million, was deposited in our public accounts in May of 2014. Now we’re looking for an appropriation to spend $1.5 million. Where is the remaining of this money and where was it spent? Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

So, again, things are coming down to some more clarity. That’s an August 31st deadline that Members were made aware. Prior to that I can assure Members here and those listening in, Regular Members of the committee here weren’t fully aware of the severity and the gravity happening behind the scenes. Of course, we all understood there were low water issues. I mean, we’re quite observant in that regard, but Members were somewhat handicapped, as I said, in terms of having this type of information. Now that we have this information and now that we’re discussing this here today, I guess my question...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I do rise in support of this motion and I would like to thank the mover, Mr. Bromley, and Mr. Nadli for bringing it forward today.

As I’m sitting here listening to my colleagues speak toward this motion, I am saddened for a number of reasons; we failed, plain and simple. I think Mr. Moses said it clearly, we’re so bogged down with all the things that are our day-to-day lives, we forget certain things and this is one of the areas that I think that even from a Member of this House, from a Member of the Social Programs committee, we failed, and I apologize to those with...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

Thank you, Madam Chair. It gives me great pleasure to finally get to this part of the budget, which has been talked about here in the media for a number of weeks at the end of August and early part of September when residents were notified that the government took a lead action in trying to mitigate the low water expenditures or low water issue at Snare and Bluefish and took it upon themselves to give a bit of a bird’s eye view of what was about to come here today. This has been big in the making and I’m glad we are finally having an ability to talk about this appropriation in its full...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

The report also indicates that enforcement offers what is called server training and conducts these courses free of charge to all NWT licence holders. This is voluntary, but the Liquor Board can order a business to attend at their discretion. Interestingly, for the past two years of this report, three communities, Fort Simpson, Inuvik and Norman Wells, had zero server training participants, yet once again it appears that in this 2014-15 report, 67 percent of the participants targeted and voluntarily forced to attend were from Yellowknife.

So once again, can the Minister indicate why the...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 88)

I appreciate the offer of the Minister, but the Minister clearly is aware. the sands of the hour glass are dissipating quite quickly. What he’s asking for in terms of number of days left is not feasible, it’s not going to happen in time. This is going to fall on deaf ears once again. It will be picked up by the 18th Assembly, hopefully, and through some stewardship that we are going to become better people at doing this job.

This is not the responsibility of a Member. This is not the responsibility of a committee to ask the government to provide information. It should be provided willingly...