Daryl Dolynny

Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Does committee agree?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, committee. I’d like to thank Speaker Jacobson, Mr. Mercer and Mr. Ouellette for joining us today. If I could get the Sergeant-at-Arms to please escort our witnesses out of the Chamber.

Committee, as agreed upon earlier today, we’re going to continue on. We’re going to be doing Supplementary Estimates (Operations Expenditures), No. 2, 2014-2015. This is Tabled Document 155-17(5). With that, we’ll go to the Minister for opening remarks. Minister of Finance, Mr. Miltenberger.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Question has been called. Motion is defeated.

---Defeated

Thank you, committee. Committee, we are going to continue on with consideration for detail on forest management, Environment and Natural Resources, page 22. Forest management, infrastructure investments, $8.720 million. Mr. Bromley.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, committee. We’ll commence with that after a brief break.

---SHORT RECESS

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, committee. If I can get you to turn to page 7, Legislative Assembly, total infrastructure investments, $150,000. Does committee agree?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, Mr. Blake. To the motion. Minister Miltenberger.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Speaker Jacobson.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Good afternoon, committee. I’d like to call Committee of the Whole to order today. What is the wish of committee? Ms. Bisaro.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. To the motion, Mr. Yakeleya.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 44)

Thank you, Speaker Jacobson. Mr. Mercer and Mr. Ouellette, welcome to the Chamber again.

Committee, as we agreed upon earlier with convention, we will not do any opening comments. We’ll go directly to general comments. Does committee agree that there are no general comments and we can proceed to detail?