Daryl Dolynny

Thank you, Mr. Chair, for your wisdom. That was a question I was going to ask, when we might be able to get that information.

Earlier, and again I don’t have the transcripts to go by, but I know the deputy minister indicated that part of the increase in the cost was due to the crossings. There were some crossings over some major rivers that possibly escalated the price. Was the original bid not including all river crossings? Again, I don’t have the original scope and mandate of the project, but I was led to believe, as a Member here, when this went out to tender, all river crossings were being...

Committee, we’re going to defer page 19 until after we have dealt with consideration of the activity. If I can turn your attention to pages 20 and 21, conservation, assessment and monitoring, infrastructure investments, $100,000. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Committee, again, we’re on page 48, 49, and 50, tourism and parks, infrastructure investments, $3.598 million. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Minister McLeod. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. Minister McLeod.

That’s great to know that here, so why don’t I just ask one at a time here. Highway No. 1 reconstruction, negotiated or RFP? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Campbell. Mr. Bromley.

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. I will allow Minister Ramsay to have a final comment.

Thank you, Mr. Bouchard. Minister McLeod.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the response. For the most part, I think the Members on this side of the House were very supportive of this project. I know I have been and I’ve been able to see the merits in the long term for the residents of the Northwest Territories.

This is a P3 project, if you will, and I think we need to get an understanding of what does this really mean now that this project is finished or coming to completion and it’s now on our books. So to bring it to a conceptual number we can understand, proponents built this for the government, built this for the taxpayer and we...