Daryl Dolynny

Thank you, Premier McLeod. Again, Ms. McLaughlin, Mr. Fulford, thank you for joining. General comments. I’ll go to Mr. Bromley.

Thank you, Mr. Nadli. Premier McLeod.

Thank you, Mr. Fulford. Mr. Nadli.

Thank you, Premier McLeod. Committee, we’ll go to the chairperson of the Priorities and Planning standing committee that reviewed the bill for general comments. Ms. Bisaro.

Thank you, committee. Does committee agree that Bill 3, Surface Rights Board Act, is ready for third reading?

---Bill 3 as a whole approved for third reading

Thank you, committee. I’d like to thank Ms. McLaughlin and Mr. Fulford for joining us here this afternoon. I know a lot of hard work went into these bills. Sergeant-at-Arms, if you could please escort the witnesses, and also thanks to the Premier.

What is the wish of committee? Ms. Bisaro.

So, do we have anything legally binding that will force a review of this legislation within a specific time period? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Nadli.

Does committee agree that Bill 2, Archeological Sites Act, is ready for third reading?

----Bill 2 as a whole approved for third reading

Clauses 91 to 100.

---Clauses 91 through 100 inclusive approved

Again, I appreciate the Premier’s response, which is also what leads me to some concern that this is basically left in the hands of a future Assembly with a potential review. We’re not guaranteed a review and that’s why I am questioning that here today.

I guess my question is: Is there any opposition, perceived opposition with the government that is proposing this bill, of actually including a review triggering mechanism in this bill and in all other nine subsequent mirror legislation bills? Is there an opposition if an amendment was to be brought to the floor of the House?