Daryl Dolynny

Thank you, committee. Sergeant-at-Arms, if you would escort the witnesses in, please.

Minister McLeod, would you like to introduce your witnesses to the House?

Thank you, Mr. Anderson. Ms. Bisaro.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Is it possible that when we tendered this out and were seeking proponents that even our geophysical assessments were possibly not complete? I’m just saying this because I remember some of the proponents who came forward said loud and clear that there were going to be some hurdles, that some of our geotechnical wasn’t exactly accurate, that this was going to cost more, thereby making the bid of the current proponent having a bit of an unfair advantage over what we already knew. Then when they started the work, they went, “By the way, we’re going to need more money because...

Pages 22 and 23, Environment and Natural Resources, environment, infrastructure investments, $100,000. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. I will consider that more of a comment. Committee, we are on pages 28-29, wildlife, infrastructure investments, $5.378 million. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Mr. Hawkins, you’ve got some time left. Okay, thank you. Committee, we are on pages 54 and 55, court services, infrastructure investment $867,000. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Minister McLeod. We’ll continue with general comments with Mr. Blake.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Committee, we’re on pages 62 to 72 and we’re on finance and infrastructure services, infrastructure investments, $22.187 million. Does committee agree?

I appreciate that. I also see Highway No. 3 and Highway No. 7, if I can get an update as well.

Thank you, Mr. Bouchard. Minister Ramsay.