Daryl Dolynny

Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

So what we’re saying here is if there is a dispute, I have to take my dispute to the courts. I may have to go even as high as the Supreme Court of the NWT to lodge a complaint, which could be very costly to the plaintiff in the event of a dispute.

Does the department consider or will they consider anything that will actually assist a dispute resolution with respect to probate?

Probates become very complicated. They become very emotional and sometimes you have to have safeguards to protect the estate, family members are usually involved and a public trustee is put in a position of power. Again...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Grundy. General comments. Is committee prepared to go clause by clause?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Does committee agree that Bill 60, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, No. 2, is ready for third reading?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, committee. If it’s committee’s wish, I’d like to do that in groups of five. Is committee okay with that?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, committee. Sergeant-at-Arms, would you please escort the witnesses into the House.

Minister Beaulieu, if you could please introduce your witnesses to the Chamber.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I don’t want to continue with questioning too much longer here. I think we have heard loud and clear my concern the way this act has come about. It is unfortunate that I don’t have enough support from my colleagues here, otherwise I would have a motion to not pass this bill as written, for the very reasons of lack of consultation. However, since I don’t have enough support to do so, I am not going to belittle this process any further. I just hope that this serves as a deep reminder to the department, to Ministers, to make sure that you bring full consultation to this...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

When we reviewed the estate administration rules, within the legislative proposal there was a component where exercise of that power could be subject to court supervision. The question is: How does this act empower the court to exercise that supervisory role where the public trustee has to intervene with their authority?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Lafferty. Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Okay, committee. Bill 49 is now ready for third reading. Thank you, committee. I’d like to thank Minister Beaulieu this evening here and I’d like to thank Mr. Loutitt, Mr. Neudorf and Ms. Jarock for joining us this evening. Sergeant-at-Arms, if you could please escort the witnesses out of the Chamber.

Committee, we’re going to continue on with our committee business here, Bill 60, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, No. 2. With that, I’ll turn it over to the Minister responsible. Minister Beaulieu.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Does committee agree that Bill 60, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, is ready for third reading?