Daryl Dolynny
Statements in Debates
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Minister Beaulieu. Ms. Jarock, Mr. Neudorf, Mr. Loutitt, welcome to the House this evening folks. Okay, committee, we’re on Bill 49. We’re going to open up to general comments. General comments. Is committee prepared to go clause-by-clause?
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Order, committee. Committee, we’re going to continue on with House business. Bill 61, An Act to Amend the Public Airports Act. With that, we’ll turn it over to the Minister responsible, Minister Beaulieu.
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Can the Minister indicate why?
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Minister Lafferty. Ms. Murphy, Mr. Grundy, welcome back to the House.
Committee, again, we’re on Bill 45. We’re going to open it up to general comments. Mr. Bromley.
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Mr. Bouchard. Minister Beaulieu.
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you. I appreciate the response. We heard the term monitor, which I think is of importance to Members of this side of the House. So I guess the question we should be asking is in this monitoring there must be some measurable, there must be information that would be subscribed to in terms of finding efficiencies within this Fine Option Program.
Will the department and will the Minister commit on sharing that information as this act comes on board and be able to share the success or the failures of this program as it relates to this act being passed? Thank you.
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Minister. Does committee agree?
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Does committee agree that Bill 60, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, No. 2, is ready for third reading?
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m going to chime in here with my colleague Mr. Menicoche. What we’re hearing here today is absolutely hogwash. We’ve got a northern contractor here, the only northern contractor left that has yet to be paid for the work and services they did on the bridge, and we’ve got a referee program that we’ve clearly documented and the government has said we agree with the terms, we just don’t have the money left.
What kind of message are we telling our contractors out there? Please do the work for the government and we’ll pay you when we think or when we feel?
The Minister talks...
Debates of
, 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)
Thank you, Minister Lafferty. Does committee agree?