David Krutko

Mackenzie Delta

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 26)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Tomorrow, March 11th, snowmobilers from Fort McPherson will be skidooing to the headwaters of their traditional territory, the Peel River watershed. The Tetlit Gwich’in Council and Na-Cho Nyak Dun have spent many months planning this snowmobile trip, originally planning to leave Fort McPherson and ending in Mayo. Due to unforeseen circumstances and time shortage, the trip will see that both parties meet halfway between Fort McPherson and Mayo at the headwaters of the Peel River watershed.

The purpose of this trip is to revisit the traditional trails that were once...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 26)

Maybe the Minister can elaborate on the Aklavik project, since you mentioned it. What project is it?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 26)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It’s in regard to these type of projects I think that we have to seriously start implementing these type of projects in high cost communities. No offence to Fort Smith; we’ve made a major capital investment last year in regard to electric heat, putting electric heat in a bunch of public facilities and a lot of infrastructure dollars went into that, and also into the heating systems we see here in Yellowknife, now Hay River, Fort Smith. But I think we have to do something in regard to the high cost communities in the northern part. I mean, the northern part, north of...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 26)

I will try to rephrase my question. My question was, can the government consider putting into its business plan an estimate for gravel road source to 177 costs about $1 million a kilometre where to Nahanni Butte we are spending $500,000 a year to build that road to that community? I would like to know exactly using that ball park number, would the government consider putting forward in its business plans that it is going to cost $1 million a kilometre to build roads to gravel sources in our communities?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 26)

Mr. Speaker, as we all know, this is a joint appointment. I believe the last time it was advertised in the papers here. Would it also be advertised in the Nunavut papers? Also, would interested groups be able to take part by way of aboriginal organizations being notified about this appointment?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Another area I noticed that you talk about some 30 bridges that you also have to look at in regards to managing the project. I know that, in light of the Deh Cho Bridge, there are other bridges that still have to be put in place. One of the areas that I’m working on is the area of the Peel River Bridge, which was something that was supposed to be done when the Dempster Highway was built back in 1972. Yet, there is the possibility of doing that, but I think it is important that we do have to find a way to work in partnership.

I know that the Deh Cho Bridge is a model that we can build on. I...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

That’s exactly my point. I believe the program before, we were looking at seven years. Now I believe it’s been shrunk down to two or three years. That’s why I’m asking. Is it now possible for those communities who are now in the planning stage and basically having to come forward with an engineered building design of a road system being able to access this Building Canada Fund under the same premise as to their the gravel sources?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

In my discussions with Mr. Niditchie and his family, the ideal solution they would like is to move him and relocate him to the opposite side of the highway, up the hill a bit so it’s off of where this problem is and thereby remedying the problem. The problem is only on one side of the highway. I’d just like to ask the Minister if he would seriously consider looking at that possible option.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Chairman, also another issue that has come up in regards to renewable resource council meetings at the Gwich’in assemblies is the amount of gravel that this government puts into the rivers on the Mackenzie and the Peel. I believe the Mackenzie is almost 1,600 cubic metres a year. The Peel is somewhere around 1,200. I think that if you have been doing that for the last 30 years, that is a heck of a lot of gravel that you have put into the river system. The concern is what effect it has on the aquatic life by way of fish spawning areas. The question they are asking is why is Fisheries and...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Just in regards to highways, as we have seen the weaving that we are starting to see because of permafrost and also we are starting to see a lot more sloping, sliding along the hillsides and also in regards to the effects it is having on our infrastructure. As a department, is there anything that is being done to find ways to mitigate some of these challenges? In the past we used to use permafrost. It worked for us by way of building on top of it and building layers over top. We are starting to see that with the temperature changes it is having an effect on world conditions, especially in the...