David Krutko

Mr. Chairman, also another issue that has come up in regards to renewable resource council meetings at the Gwich’in assemblies is the amount of gravel that this government puts into the rivers on the Mackenzie and the Peel. I believe the Mackenzie is almost 1,600 cubic metres a year. The Peel is somewhere around 1,200. I think that if you have been doing that for the last 30 years, that is a heck of a lot of gravel that you have put into the river system. The concern is what effect it has on the aquatic life by way of fish spawning areas. The question they are asking is why is Fisheries and...

Just in regards to highways, as we have seen the weaving that we are starting to see because of permafrost and also we are starting to see a lot more sloping, sliding along the hillsides and also in regards to the effects it is having on our infrastructure. As a department, is there anything that is being done to find ways to mitigate some of these challenges? In the past we used to use permafrost. It worked for us by way of building on top of it and building layers over top. We are starting to see that with the temperature changes it is having an effect on world conditions, especially in the...

Mr. Chairman, my point is that we are telling other people to tighten their belts, operate within your expenditure levels and basically be cognizant of the situation around you, and yet again we have communities that are in a deficit situation. People have to pay more power rates. People are paying more in regards to their water bills. People are paying more by way of their expenditures in their communities and basically they are telling us that they are struggling, but yet they see government operating in this manner. No wonder they get frustrated with the way government spends its money.

You...

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I had an opportunity to travel back to my constituency this week and do a whirlwind tour. One of the highlights of the trip was to go into Aklavik and have an official signing ceremony with the community. Aklavik is in the process of developing a community economic sustainable development plan along with a university on Vancouver Island and using graduate students to work with the community to develop this plan.

The whole initiative is going to be an historical project that will involve all members of the community through a process of developing, producing, and...

Mr. Chairman, I believe that it is needed. When basically there is a risk of moving goods and services on and off a vessel because you don’t have the proper docking facilities, I think that is something that has to be addressed. I think a lot of our communities basically don’t have year-round access and do depend on these barge resupplies that they do have to have the proper facilities. Again, I would just like to stress to the Minister if he can see if there is a possible way that we can design such a facility or even improve what is there already so that they are able to properly dock these...

If we could get that information from the Minister it would be great. But the reason I’m asking is that in the case of Aklavik, they apply that EK-35 and it does work. If anything, if you’re not going to extend the airport, I think that at least having an airport that’s in pretty good shape, especially with these chemicals. I think it’s important that you do continue to reapply the chemical if you’re not going to extend those airports, because it does make a difference for the aircraft. You even notice it flying into these communities. The ones that have the chemical you can notice the...

Mr. Chairman, it is good for this government to use this scenario. The communities are in the same predicament. They have the same types of costs. They have basically deficits that are running because of these unpredictable costs. The budget isn’t designed to deal with these types of trends, but yet we are not there to help out the communities. Now we are saying sorry, you are on your own. You have to budget. Sorry, you have to fend for yourselves. I would like to know exactly why is it that we allow this to happen in government but yet we are telling the municipalities and the small...

Are we under marine?

Yeah, just with regard to the federal legislation, because of the change in the legislation where it requires a certain length of airport, I am wondering if that airport falls within that required length or does it have to be extended under the new federal regulations where you operate certain types of aircraft on these airports in the communities. They have to be a certain length for certain types of aircraft. I would just like to know does that meet that specific federal standard. That’s why I asked the question if it has to be extended, because I believe it’s only 2,500 feet.

Just in regards to the supp again. I am just wondering why it wasn’t brought forward during the fiscal year 2007-08 when you did have the deficit and which you were able to account for that fiscal year than bringing it forward to 2008-09. Why wasn’t it addressed at that time?