David Ramsay

Kam Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Yes, it is, Mr. Chairman. In July 2011 the Minister of ITI appointed several Members to that committee.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

I thank the Member for that. The subject of community energy plans doesn’t fall necessarily under ITI’s mandate, but to my recollection most communities are completed through the Building Canada Plan their community energy plans. That question may be better suited maybe when MACA is before committee. But that’s my understanding. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess I need a little bit more clarification from the Member in terms of what exactly he wants to know we’re working on.

We know the status at any one time of the various projects that are underway across the Northwest Territories in the area of development and advancement. If there’s one in particular he wants an update on, we can provide that, but I’m not sure if he’s looking for a comprehensive view of all the projects that are ongoing or how that works. So maybe I’ll just go back to the Member for clarification on what he’s looking for. I’d be happy to provide it...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Through business plans we heard the concerns from the Members and we have taken steps to review the office in Hay River. We’ve come back to committee. We’re in the process of working through that and we hope to continue to move forward. I appreciate the Member’s comments, but I’ve given a commitment to do that and I will continue to pursue that.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

The MECC is a committee of Cabinet so those would first be proposed there, as is the way business is conducted here, would filter through the committee system that we have set up here.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Yes, we can supply that to the Member.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Not today, Mr. Chair, but perhaps next week. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I thank the Members for the opening comments on ITI’s budget.

I will start with some of the comments Mr. Yakeleya made. I agree with him; I think it is a tough balancing act in looking at sustainable development and protecting the environment. There is a lot going on in the Sahtu these days with the development of the Canol Trail. It is very exciting. There have obviously been a number of opportunities there for residents to look at job opportunities. There have been opportunities for businesses there. That will continue into this summer and into next winter. Again, it...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

I thank the Member for that question. It just reinforces what we’re trying to do here is very complex. In the situation in the Sahtu we need to find a suitable fix for the Bear River. Yes, we have to respect the language in the land claim, certainly a solution there. Again, I mentioned earlier meeting with the new chief and the president of the land corporation. There are solutions out there; we just haven’t found the right one. Perhaps this new one they’ve brought to our attention is something, I know they’re excited about it, maybe that’s going to be the remedy there and the way forward. We...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 8)

The Government of the Northwest Territories has supported the Aboriginal Pipeline Group in the past and we’re continuing to support the APG. It’s important that we do that. I don’t believe it’s going blindly. I believe it’s supporting the potential advancement of the Aboriginal Pipeline Group. When the Mackenzie Gas Project does go ahead, they will own one-third of that pipeline and it will be the big piece of the capacity building for Aboriginal groups in the Northwest Territories. Our support of the APG is integral to that advancing. With the MGP, we’re optimistic that it will see the light...