David Ramsay

Kam Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Zoe. Clause 3.

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Roland. Mr. Braden.

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. That’s where I disagree with the Minister. People want to speak up because they want something done. I think they would feel better taking part in this review if they knew that their concerns would be acted upon. By keeping the report confidential, I think that might even scare people into not saying anything, because then they will feel that their concerns aren’t going to be acted upon. I would like to ask the Minister -- he’s already answered it -- how come his department can’t black out the names? There are ways this report can get into the hands of the Members of...

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Zoe. Clause 2.

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Roland. Mr. Braden, anything further?

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Minister, for your response. That will lead me to the next question and I am glad the Minister started speaking about the review of human resources at the North Slave Correctional Centre. Yesterday he was asked to produce a terms of reference for this review and seeing that its out of his department’s hands as far as that goes, maybe that discussion that he was going to have with his deputy might fall under the mandate of Mr. Roland and whether we can get a copy of that terms of reference. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 21)

Clause 2.

Debates of , (day 21)

Okay. Continue, Mr. Braden.

Debates of , (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thanks, Mr. Minister, for the response. That’s all fine and good, but this report that’s going to be done on the duplication may be between NWT Arctic Tourism and the department that’s going to happen and that’s going to roll out, but when? When is the government going to put more resources and more money into tourism? That’s the question I have for the Minister. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 21)

To clause by clause, schedule 2?