Don Stewart

Hay River

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 85)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just in terms of the schools in Hay River, as the Member noted, Ecole Boreale was constructed in 2005, so it’s about a 10-year-old school, so it would be a while before it would be in a retrofit situation. Diamond Jenness was just completed in 2012. In the case of Harry Camsell, it was constructed in 1990 and had a renovation in 1996, so it would be starting to get to that point where I think it would be getting towards that point of looking at another retrofit, although obviously it has to be assessed against all the others that are in that timing as well.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 85)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. As the Minister said, as the Member would know, there was an appeal of the court order. The Francophone representatives have indicated that they are appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, and we’re waiting to hear from the Supreme Court as to whether they’re going to take up that case or not. The Francophone Association suggested to us that we should wait until we get that answer back before we proceed from there, and we agreed with that proposal that we’ll hold off on starting anything until we hear whether the Supreme Court is going to take the appeal or not.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 85)

Sorry about that. It is an older school but it was renovated in 2002, so it’s about 13 years since the last renovation there.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

That is certainly something we could do, but obviously there’s a fixed number of units that we have available in the Northwest Territories. So if we were to add eight in Fort Resolution, we would have to take eight away from another community and I suspect there would be concerns raised about taking eight units away from another community. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

The unit was empty at the time, I believe, of the needs survey. I would point out, though, that between 2009 and 2014 the core need in Fort Resolution in 2009 was 50 percent of dwellings and in 2014 it was 24.6 percent of dwellings. So I think there has been a fair amount of progress in that community in terms of addressing core need.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I know we have done a technical assessment of the building in the past. I don’t have the information right in front of me, but we did look at what would be required to get it back operational and that’s something we would consider in setting the purchase price. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just quickly, as the Member is aware, we went to a bulk procurement process for our LHOs, and part of the reason for that was to some of the issues that you raised, was to make sure that there was a consistent approach to being used to inventory control and that there was some thinking behind what they bought and where we get it.

For last year’s bulk procurement, 100 percent of the tenders in there, the contracts went to northern companies. Eighty percent were local and the other 20 percent went to companies in other regions, when we did it by region by region.

Certainly...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yes, the $26 million is for the utilities we would pay to operate the public housing or the housing stock across the NWT that we own. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The allocation of our public housing stock is obviously done at a community level. Fort Resolution has 75 units that you would expect to see in public housing. They currently have 75 units, excluding those eight that are being sold. So to put those back in the stock would change the community allocations and then we would have to find the extra resources to provide the subsidy there as well. They are at their allocation currently. Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 57)

I believe the 2014 result was 24.6 percent of the dwellings were in core need.