Floyd Roland

Inuvik Boot Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As the Minister stated, the way the process would work is, number one, the health board would have to go to the department for requests for any increases and substantiate it to them, and then the department would come to FMB for a request in any increase in funding and then substantiate to us. It does go through a couple of levels. But as we’ve heard here today, the concern about how the initial estimates came up, and I’ve committed to providing more detail as to what those estimates were and the basis of how they came up with those. So we will get that and provide...

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, once again, we’d have to go to the specific policy that’s in place and, as well, look at what may have happened in a situation. In fact, if the employee -- we’re going hypothetical here -- were doing something that was absolutely outside of what they were supposed to be doing, then we’d have difficulty receiving that type of coverage. Again, it’s almost a case-by-case situation with the actual policy that’s in place, and we can try to get some of that information and share it with the members. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the union has been consulted in this process. The legislative proposal was brought forward to the committee. Based on that, we have gone ahead and drafted legislation. We are not quite finished with it. It is coming forward. As we feel, there has been consultation enough that we feel comfortable in developing legislation. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, the boards are funded through a formula and an amount given to them on an annual basis and they do have to live within their budget. When they find themselves short, they can go to the department and try and substantiate why in fact they do need more funding, and in this case they have provided the documentation about the growth. The growth is in the actual area that’s being presented in utility costs. I don’t know if the Minister of Health might have more information on that, but that’s what we’ve been provided and going on. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, the detail I have is just the fact that it’s liability insurance. The actual policy I haven’t seen and if we want to get to that level of detail, I’d have to get an insurance specialist to look at it. But it is liability insurance. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I should clarify, a legislative proposal was developed. We were hoping to actually bring the legislation forward for this sitting, but unfortunately we weren’t able to make that timeline. We will hopefully have it ready for the next sitting that we have as an Assembly. On the existing process, there is right now room for a union representative at the table. So there is that space right now when a member is going through a staffing appeal process; on the grievance side, especially, there is room for that. We recognize there are problems. We’ve worked...

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I hope I’m not coming forward in the next year with cost overruns in that area for that facility. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, just for the record as well, the committee will see where the savings part of this is in under the Department of Health and Social Services later on in this document. On the board side of it, the insurance part is the liability insurance. That’s the portion that was folded in. I believe that we do in fact insure the education boards, except for Yellowknife No. 1 and No. 2, I believe. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

I’m sorry, Mr. Chairman; if I can have the member repeat his question.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, I do.