Floyd Roland

Inuvik Boot Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As I stated, we will get the policy and provide that information as to what is covered and what is not covered. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Supplementary Appropriation No. 4 requests authority for additional appropriations of $2.478 million for operations expenditures for departmental over-expenditures.

The request is being made to comply with the authorization process for over-expenditures of appropriations occurring in the 2003-2004 fiscal year, as provided for in the Financial Administration Act. Details of the over-expenditures are as follows:

$231,000 for the Department of the Executive, Financial Management Board Secretariat, that represents the over-expenditure caused by accruing a $3 million loss...

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We have a lot of examples of where, in fact, we have used funds, or the health boards have come back for more funds and we’ve granted that based on substantiations they’d make. But for more details, if we can go to the Minister of Health and Social Services and he might be able to provide more information than I have. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We do have liability insurance for a number of different issues or situations that might arise. We have found there are certain types of liability insurance that we are just unable to receive any more because of the potential costs that are associated with the activities that may occur. It is difficult in some areas to get certain types of liability insurance nowadays. But for that which we are able to get, we’ve worked to ensure that our government employees, staff and people who work for the government are covered. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. First of all, for the record, we do not view union representatives or those that attend with employees or potential employees as props. They are part of a process. They are allowed to be there if requested by the member appealing. We weren’t able to make the timelines for the legislation. It is still in the works, so we weren’t able to finish it off. We were hoping to have it ready for this sitting. As I said, we will be bringing it forward during the next sitting we have. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will get the department to provide that information. We will look back at the estimates that were made and how they made them and provide that to members. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, both Yellowknife No. 1 and No. 2 boards have their own assets because of the way they’re funded, and they receive funds through the tax base here in Yellowknife. They operate quite independently of our process. We do have a funding arrangement with them, but on the way they’ve operated they are independent of us and sought their own insurance. We can discuss with the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment if there’s opportunity there to work together. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the work we have done around staffing appeals has been a slow process, but we have been working on it. We are prepared to make some changes. We have listened to the AOC and its previous recommendations on the concerns that were around the whole issue of staffing appeals. So, number one, we have recognized that there are problems; number two, we have listened to the recommendations, and there was a report done which we are taking pieces of that and going forward with that. I can’t give a date as to when this would actually come into play, but I am...

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’d have to get more of a breakdown as to when the first full year of operation was in. They’ve just moved into it, so I believe the 2002-03 year was a partial year, 2003-04 was a full year. So it’s hard to do the comparison, but I can get that information for members. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 24)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is not an increase in the actual premiums. This is a shift between the Department of Health and Social Services over to the Department of Finance. We found in a case where Health and Social Services was doing some of its own insuring we felt that there was a savings by transferring it over and this is the amount that we feel…It’s actually health boards, I believe, were insuring some of their own items. So we’ve pulled them into our total government insurance program, by that saving some numbers. But there is an added cost to their side of the equation and that’s...