Statements in Debates
Thank you, Mr. Aumond. Next on my list… Actually, there is nobody left on my list. Page 6-17, Municipal and Community Affairs, activity summary, public safety, operations expenditure summary, $1.527 million.
Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Minister McLeod.
Page 6-40, Municipal and Community Affairs, activity summary, regional operations, grants and contributions, community government grants and contributions, contributions, $13.485 million.
Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Mr. Anderson.
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Page 5-60, NWT Housing Corporation, information item, infrastructure investment summary.
Going on to page 6-15, Municipal and Community Affairs, information item, directorate, active positions. Agreed?
Moving along to page 6-22. Municipal and Community Affairs, activity summary, community operations, grants and contributions, contributions, $50,000.
Page 6-35, contributions, total grants and contributions, $3.357... Oh, Mr. Bromley.
Thank you, Mr. Krutko, Minister McLeod.
There is concern about consistency in public consultation. If you go out into the public, the Wildlife Act is a prime example. I’m curious how the Premier can ensure the public that their input is being heard in all forms of public consultation, in particularly something like the Wildlife Act. What are we going to do to ensure that application is consistent and people’s voices are heard? This doesn’t mean the government has to agree with everything they hear. It is a public government, there are lots of people’s opinions, but we need to ensure people are heard and acknowledged. So how does the...