Kevin O'Reilly

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I’m looking at page 132, and this is the Northwest Territories Power Corporation snare hydro system. I know that, in the last couple of years, we’ve had to provide extra subsidies to the Power Corporation in terms of low water levels. How is it looking this year, Mr. Chair? Sorry, I’m just wondering what the water levels are looking like and whether there is any expectation that the Department of Finance is going to have to provide additional funding to the Power Corporation? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I will try one more time. Before the Premier or Cabinet or the Minister responsible issues further policy direction to the Public Utilities Board, will the Minister consult with the Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I’m looking at page 128, which is the revenue summary. I see that Tobacco Tax revenues are $15.6 million; liquor revenues are $23.5 million. I add them up. Generally, it looks like about $39 million in revenues there from tobacco and liquor. Then I look at the net resource revenues that we get to keep from mining and oil and gas. That is found on Roman numeral xii of the main estimates. It looks like the amount that we actually get to keep from non-renewable resource revenue, so that is mining and oil and gas, is $13 million.

Look, I understand that 50 per cent of the non...

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks. I appreciate the response and I'll just go on record again as having some concerns about the loss of capacity for this important work, and I think it may affect our capacity and ability to continue to negotiate. Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. Just to be clear, I am not advocating doing that, but once again, the Regular MLAs were not told about this. Our advice was not sought. This was not brought before standing committee. It was something that Cabinet went off and did on their own. What is the future of this board? Is the Premier prepared to bring some sort of an options paper or start to engage the appropriate standing committee on this before issuing further policy direction to the PUB? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. Maybe I am just a little bit thicker today. This $2 million, is this money that we allocate on an annual basis then into the liabilities fund? Is that what is happening? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I think I understand it a little better. So all of those people coming together to serve what used to be four departments, were positions cut within some of the other departments that they used to serve or were they all direct staff transfers into this shared corporate services unit? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I appreciate that answer, but it was fairly prescriptive policy direction in terms of items that are going to come before it. Why bother having a Public Utilities Board if we are going to issue that sort of direction? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I appreciate all of that. I am just curious, though: where would the revenue start to show up when they start to flow? Is it going to be in the Finance budget or the main estimates? Where are they going to show up? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 62)

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thanks for that clarification. I guess my concern and point is that those individuals now have to serve more people. There are more people. It's an amalgamated department, so their efforts are going to have to be spread over a greater number of initiatives and so on. I suspect some of that includes support for negotiations. Is that the case? Thanks, Mr. Chair.