Kevin O'Reilly

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. Yes, I would be interested in seeing that sort of document. There is obviously no sort of urgency, now we have a number of other things. If the department could provide that, even in conjunction with the next business plan, that would be helpful. Thanks, Mr. Chair. That is all I have.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. A couple of things here I wanted to pursue. Presumably this is the section where taxes are dealt with in some measure. I’m just wondering, the federal government made a commitment to increase the northern resident tax deduction. They didn’t index it. I’ve raised that here in the House, and I know the Minister was just at a Finance Ministers’ meeting in Vancouver, I think, on the weekend. It just came to my mind that I should ask him, was there any movement towards indexing of the northern resident tax deduction at that meeting, and has he had an opportunity to work with his...

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair, and I want to thank the Speaker for providing that information. I’m just curious, these independent statutory officers, do they prepare their own budgets and those are submitted then to the Board of Management for review, is that how the process works? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. The Minister answered the question about the annual review part but how do we compare against other jurisdictions in terms of our fees and licence payments and so on? Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. Just so I understand this. If all this money then is not spent subsidizing diesel, then it could be reallocated towards an investment in renewables in the current year? Would that be done through a sup? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair, I appreciate that. I guess I’ll just reiterate. I think the problem is with the design of the program. If there’s a $40,000 cap and it’s not fully subscribed, there’s a need there, the problem is with the design of the program. I’m just asking if the Minister will come to committee and try to work out a way to improve the services and redesign the program.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the Minister’s commitment to do that. I look forward to getting the information. I have one other question about the contribution for Arctic Energy Alliance. In 2015-16, it looks like there was a one-time contribution of $1.8 million done through supplementary appropriations. Can someone from the department explain what happened there? Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. No other questions.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Look, I am not trying to prolong this.

---Laughter

I see the top that says there is an authorized fund limit of $6.5 million, yet how does that figure into all these numbers here because most of them seem to be over that amount. Can someone help me understand this? Thanks, Mr. Chair.

Debates of , 18th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 25)

Thanks, Mr. Chair. The $2.2 million that is referenced in the Minister’s opening remarks… I am still trying to figure out how there is an actual increase. Where is the other money that is going into that Housing Corp actually coming from if it is not a contribution from our government? Thanks, Mr. Chair.