Kevin O'Reilly

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 135)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I want to thank the Minister for that because he's of course getting into my second question. The problems in Hay River are different and, in some ways, very similar, though, to what Yellowknife was like before the expansion of Ecole Allain StCyr. Ecole Boreale has been forced to keep its senior students in a portable for 13 years. Count it 13 years. And there are continuing issues with heating, water, and sewer services. The students also need to compete for gym time with the nearby public school.

Can the Minister tell us what he is going to do with regard to...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I move that the chair rise and report progress.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I'm well on record as to the systemic issues with ITI's approach on public engagement on the mining regulations, and this has been repeated again with this disconnected socioeconomic program review. The command control model for public engagement and regulatory capture are alive and well in this department, as proven again by this event.

So can the Minister tell us what she is doing to ensure public participation in the development of resource management legislation and regulations and the decisionmaking itself? Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I want to thank the Minister for that. You can't call it a forum when you purposefully exclude some parties; I just don't get it. But there was a very large, and no doubt expensive, report commissioned on socioeconomic agreements and was released only after this event with no public fanfare. It clearly shows that our current approach is failing to secure and retain benefits.

So can the Minister explain why that report was not or why the people that did the report didn't present it at the forum; why it was only released after the event; and why there's been no news...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I attended a socio-economic forum on December 5th, 2022 put on by the Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment as part of its work to review socio-economic agreements. The GNWT has six such agreements in place covering large resource development projects. These negotiated arrangements provide for commitments around employment, training, contracting, monitoring, northern preferences, and more in unenforceable agreements which are apparently the main tool for benefit retention. These agreements could become legal requirements for larger mining projects that...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I wish to table the following three documents: 2022 Mineral Resources Act Regulations Targeted Engagement Surveys for Prospecting License Holders; the second one, Mineral Resources Act Implementation Engagement Tracking Log dated November 25th, 2022; the last one, Mr. Speaker, a letter from Kevin O'Reilly, MLA, on Public Participation in Resource Management to the Ministers of Environment and Natural Resources; Industry, Tourism and Investment; and Lands, dated January 13th, 2023. Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. I accept that, and of course I'm a little bit excited but, you know, it's question period. I don't actually expect to get answers. But aside from that recent onehour public discussion with Alternatives North on socioeconomic agreements at the invitation of the organization and ITI wouldn't actually allow the event to be recorded I'm not aware of any public engagement on this massive report that the department commissioned.

So can the Minister tell us whether there will be any public engagement on the socioeconomic agreement program review in the report? Mahsi, Mr...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 134)

Merci, Monsieur le President. My questions are for the Minister of Industry, Tourism and Investment.

I outlined some concerns with the recent socioeconomic forum held in December. I received several commitments that this would be an inclusive event. Those promises were not kept. How can we get everyone on board to improve benefit retention when the Minister continues to exclude key players like Aurora College, NGOs, and the NWT Association of Communities. Can the Minister explain why the participants included only GNWT staff, the mining industry, and a few Indigenous government staff at this...

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 133)

Merci, Monsieur le President. Again, on mold, pests, and bad indoor quality indoor air quality and other housing stats, the numbers show that housing core needs have steadily gotten worse from 2009 to 2019. Today it stands at about 24 percent. A quarter of our houses are not good. This government continues to spend far more on roads than housing. Can the Minister tell us when this government will spend at least as much on housing as it does on roads? Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , 19th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 133)

Merci, Monsieur le Président. I want to thank the Minister for that. And I'll work with my constituent to get the receipts over to the Minister's office pronto. But just trying to get a response in a reasonable time frame from the Minister on my constituent's concerns about public housing in Lanky Court has been a real challenge. I suggested several times that public housing tenants are being told to move or store belongings for insect control that cleaning products and storage containers should be provided. Can the Minister tell us why cleaning products or services and storage containers are...