Michael McLeod

We are already engaged with the Construction Association on this issue. I don’t see the relevancy of having the Member attend. I’m sure they would invite him if they thought he should be there. Thank you.

We are quite familiar with what the Yukon has done in this area and the staged-in approach that they had utilized. We’ve had discussions. So the answer is yes.

I’d be glad to bring more money to the table in this program. However, consideration has to be made by all departments and the Department of Finance as we move forward with our priorities. But I will certainly take his advice and have our officials look at what could be improved on and how much money that would take, and bring that forward in the next budget that we bring forward. Thank you.

Mr. Chairman, the commitment still stands. The detail that we are looking for hasn’t been compiled to a point where we’d be able to share it with the Member. We are looking at ways and trying to be very creative. The engineering work is being done. We are looking at ways to stabilize the base. We’re looking at the cost factor and we’ve got to recognize that there was a change in leadership over this past while that kind of slowed things down. I say that because there had been some discussion as to their own priorities and we also had some discussion with a partner or our stakeholder and they...

Mr. Chairman, the work that needs to be done in terms of PDR is roughly $8 million. We need an additional $7 million and we have identified a million dollars in this budget. If the Member is actually asking about the capital estimate to do an actual Mackenzie Valley all-weather road, we’re probably looking anywhere from $1.8 billion to $2 billion. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Once again, the Member raises a lot of issues that are of concern in his riding. The issue of access road to gravel sources has become very popular or at least a common voiced concern here in this House and at a lot of our meetings. Right now we don’t have a program that allows for investment in roads to gravel sources. It is something that this government hasn’t had. I think the responsibility was devolved over to the municipalities through the New Deal program some years ago. We do have an Access Road Program that has a budget of $300,000 that communities access for...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess there are a couple of options out there. The community has done a very good job of doing a study that brought the information forward that brought us to this stage where we will probably need a project description report done on the route and the environmental side of it, and also look at the economics of it. Of course, a large stockpile by all stakeholders for gravel needs for the next five years is probably the cheapest way to go, but the community has been very determined that they need a gravel source and we’ve been very cooperative with them. The next step...

First question, I guess the $400,000 that was approved was approved last year in the budget. The agreement to supply this was in the concession agreement. I think it would be very difficult to go back and open it up at this point.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chair, the Member raises an issue that has been somewhat of a challenge over the years for us as a department. We’ve looked at a number of ways that we can suppress the dust on our highways. We’ve also done the same in a lot of the communities. We’ve used different methods and products over the years, calcium, of course, being the cheapest one; however, a very limited lifespan, about one year for calcium. We’ve also used EK35 on some municipal roads and we also used it on airports. It’s a product that’s fairly cheap, but the lifespan of EK35 is somewhat limited, it...

Mr. Chairman, we would be happy to consider all possibilities as we move forward. Thank you.