Michael McLeod

Deh Cho

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Minister, this issue of distracted driving has been brought forward by a number of people and we have looked at the situation and certainly still have been considering what would all be involved if we were to move forward. Does that include eating? Does that include other things along with cell phones? And we haven’t been able to completely be convinced that we are in a position where we would be able to have charges made. That is something that we need to consider and at this point we are just going to be in a holding position to wait until we have more information to move forward.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Speaker, that will be certainly a huge undertaking for us to accommodate the supply of power for electric vehicles. It is not an area for which we have done any type of research. I am not sure the department has that kind of capability at this point. I would be glad to undertake to work with the Energy Coordinating Committee to discuss this possibility. I would be pleased to provide a response to the Member. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Chairman, I believe the Member had asked the Minister of Municipal and Community Affairs that direct question. They have not come forward with any indication of interest to reinstate the program. Having said that, I am personally familiar with a number of communities that are now looking to chipseal the whole community through their new funding that they are receiving and they are planning to do just that. We, of course, are willing to provide any kind of advice if there’s a request made to this department. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Chairman, we did have a certain amount of slumping in one community. The town of Hay River’s airport had some problems. I think that was two years ago and that’s been rectified. That’s the only one that’s reported the concern regarding what could be potential climate change issues. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I haven’t been in this position long enough to attend the national conference with any of my federal colleagues. I would certainly be looking at the situation as the Member has raised to see what our position would be. Right now, we intend to work with the federal government on establishing some of the guidelines and be more focussed as we move forward towards the next conference. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

We’ll respond to all the different organizations that have contacted us over the last while regarding this issue and keep them informed as we move forward.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Chairman, we recognize there has been some difficulty getting the signs put up and getting them to stay up. Access is a really challenging issue to put signs in the ground or put signs up in the winter and to get them to stay up over the summer months is, of course, very difficult, and getting into and on the winter road in the summer is just something we can’t do. We did provide a couple contracts to individuals to put the signs up but it didn’t work out. We will, as the Member suggested, talk to our contractors that are always on the road system and maybe we can get some type of...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The provision for dust suppressants and other measures on the airports was approved in our capital budget in the fall and I can certainly provide that information again to the Members. I guess it’s important to clarify that chipseal can’t work in the communities. We don’t feel it’s a safe way to apply a coating to the runways. It either has to be pavement or EK-35. We’ve used it in some communities and we have a schedule to apply it to other communities to the cost of about $400,000 a year. We have a number of communities scheduled for this year. We have already done...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Mr. Chairman, not all the applications are in yet. We have Aklavik identified as a community that we expect to apply, but we have not received an application from them.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 3rd Session (day 20)

Yes, it is one of the options we’re looking at. We also looked at the possibility of looking at a better drainage system or redirecting it and changing some of the culverts so the water would run through. It would be fairly expensive. It looks like, at this point, the easiest solution would be to be able to relocate the building. There are some land issues we need to sort out, but it’s a real possibility that this is the avenue we will go.