Michael Miltenberger

Mr. Speaker, the 700 kilowatts is an average consumption figure, and most families across the North are able to live with that.

As Canadians, as Northerners we add more and more power using applications and appliances that drive up our own costs. We have things like vampires that just keep running 24 hours a day, waiting quietly to be called into use; we keep adding to our power consumption.

The issue is, is it more or is it conservation? The Yukon, I understand, has 1,000 kilowatts; we have 700. That’s an issue of debate. The commercial subsidy is another one that’s an issue of debate as well.

We work with a committee of deputies. We work with the Cabinet. We work with committees to review the plans. We’re committed to reviewing and updating the 20 year plan. We started a new process this year. We have an infrastructure committee that’s at work on improvements to the capital planning process.

This new staging of the process in the fall, for example, is one of those significant improvements that we brought forward collectively. We’re going to look to what other advice the infrastructure committee brings forward and, as well, whatever input the committee and Regular Members would...

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I, as well, always appreciate an opportunity when the Member has to tell me what to do. I appreciate her advice.

In this case we are very much on the same page. We’ve already had discussions with staff that we want to do a debrief about how the process works. We’d like to come and sit down with committee, as well, to get feedback so that we can, as we look to the cycle next year, address a lot of the issues that may come up. A lot of them may be issues related to process or content.

We are very much interested in trying to learn from this first run through, now that...

The Premier is the Minister responsible for the Power Corporation and has already indicated through questions in the House — and it’s been well discussed with Members in other settings — that there’s an opportunity here, as we look at the electrical rate review, the energy strategy and all the energy priorities that we’re developing, to take a very fundamental look at the Power Corporation — the regulatory regime, how we generate and distribute electricity. I think that opportunity is there. Through that process, if a regular, built in review is deemed appropriate, that would be the venue to...

Mr. Speaker, I arise galvanized by my colleague’s questions to respond with alacrity and great definity.

Mr. Speaker, we have the opportunity, through the strategic plans…. For example, the Housing Corporation has just incorporated an accompanying action plan to look at having that built in. The government is moving, too, across the board for all the departments to have strategic plans. I’m sure they’re the same discussions we had in regard to the Power Corporation, and that is what is deemed beneficial or essential. So I think the opportunity’s there to look at those processes, especially if...

We provided the Members information over a four year period both by constituency and by community to give Members a sense of the money that was spent. We managed to get the housing dollars as well as the money contributed by MACA, which makes for a significant amount of money that we are spreading across the North.

We want to be very careful as we look at per capita. It’s one of the issues we always take exception to when we deal with the federal government when they want to allocate the money that they have on a per capita basis, because invariably, because of the small size of our...

Mr. Speaker, firstly, I would differ somewhat from the Member’s characterization that the system is not working. It’s working, and I think that for the most part it works well. In some cases it may not be working as well as we would like, but I think overall…. We’ve been evolving this process for many, many decades now.

We have come up with what we think are the latest improvements, where we will commit to providing a ten year retrospective for Members. We’ll look at the 20-year plan going forward. We’re going to get feedback, we hope, from committee in terms of the process and steps that are...

I as well would like to recognize J.M. Miltenberger, the younger — my brother Jean-Marc Miltenberger, a successful businessman and mayor of Hay River.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I give notice that on Friday, October 24, 2008, I will move that Bill 6, Species at Risk (NWT) Act, be read for the first time.

Mr. Speaker, my assumption was that I was stating quite unequivocally that there’s an opportunity here through the strategic planning process that departments are moving to and that corporations like the Housing Corporation have moved to, to build that process in. If that is something that is deemed appropriate, through the discussions in the House and as we go through the business planning process in the coming week, and that is an issue that has value enough built into the way we do business, then the opportunity is there through that process. As I understood the Member to say, in his mind...