Michael Miltenberger

Thebacha

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 43)

That’s a level of detail into the internal workings of the IRC and the Inuvialuit that I’m not privy to.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 43)

I understand the majority owners are the Inuvialuit.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 43)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just want to note that while the Members have indicated they want to make a point about how money is allocated, we’ve spent in my life in this Assembly probably over $100 million on highways No. 3, No. 4 and No. 2, and we’ve waited patiently for 12, 13 years to try to get a piece of road upgraded. It is interesting to hear Members tell one of the smaller communities — the ones that already have the best roads in the country — to suck it up and donate some of the money back. There are tens of millions of dollars in there for highways No. 3 and No. 4 but no suggestion...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The price of the school has gone up for the reason the Member has talked about in terms of escalating costs. But the community indicated they would like an addition. There is an agreement to put in $400,000, which is being honoured. The arrangement will still be honoured. There is no requirement for any additional money from the community; we are just going to absorb whatever costs are there. But there was a significant contribution in cash to help the community achieve its goals, and the government partnered up with them to do that.

Anything outside the basic programs...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It gives me great pleasure today to be able to stand and recognize Mr. Jim Schaefer, a respected elder and former chief of the Salt River First Nation and one of the architects of their treaty land entitlement agreement with the federal government. As well, Ms. Denise Yuhas is a successful businesswoman and one of the best CAs in the business.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’ll defer that program question to Minister Lafferty.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

Mr. Chairman, once again I will just make the point that we are going to bring forward a ten year chronology. It’s very difficult to look at one particular point in time and make a long term review and assessment of how capital has been done. We know that the capital planning process needs improvement, which is why the infrastructure committee is at work. We appreciate the Member’s concern and will be working collectively here, as we move into the next business cycle, to look at how we address those issues.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

I appreciate the Member’s concern. If there are events that trigger a concern, like a sewer backup or those types of things, and there are questions about quality of air, clearly there are ways we can deal with that with Public Health or Environment.

In terms of these building standards we do our repairs as we bring things up to code. New construction must meet the building code. We have our northern building standards, as well, to try to make them as energy efficient as possible, as the deputy indicated here yesterday when talking about some of the quality of the energy ratings in some of our...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

Thank Mr. Chairman. Just quickly in response to the Member’s suggestion, the subcommittee on infrastructure that is looking at the capital planning process is in fact considering those very things that the Member has raised. There has been work underway that is being done, which is why we are, in fact, in this Legislature at this point in time doing capital early. Standardized designs and the bundling of contracts are some other things that are very evident to us as opportunities that the Member has pointed out, not only for schools but for houses and health centres. We appreciate the concern...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 2nd Session (day 42)

The reason we have instituted the deferred maintenance program is to try to address some of the backlog of the maintenance issues. We have also done assessments of a significant number of major facilities that we own. I think the offer has already been made to share with committee. The Premier as well has indicated that he is prepared to sit down and look at all that new information with the current 20 year needs assessment. Plus we’ll — just so we have a more comprehensive view — provide the ten year retrospective as well. As we move through the capital planning process, as it moves forward...