Robert Bouchard

Hay River North

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Minister keeps talking about we’re not done the bridge, and I’m not sure when we’re going to get that done. We know we’ve added stuff to the contract. We know we’ve added guardrails. We know we’ve added telephones to the system. Now we’re spending more money and the reason that this is on the floor today is because now we’re going to spend another 12 to 30 million dollars on the Tuk-Inuvik Highway. We’re willing to stroke a cheque for them, but when a contractor that’s done the work and has been talking to this government – and not only the Minister, the Premier...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Clauses 35 to 43.

---Clauses 35 through 43 inclusive approved

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Minister Abernethy. Mr. Abernethy, do you have witnesses to bring into the Chamber?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Question has been called. The motion has been carried.

---Carried

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Thank you, Minister Lafferty. I’ll ask the chairman responsible for the Standing Committee on Economic Development and Infrastructure, Mr. Hawkins.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

I am referring to Ruskin was on the job before ATCON started. We paid them out. We paid out several contractors that were doing work for ATCON that they held us accountable for the bridge. Rowe’s didn’t have that leverage. Why did we pay all those other contractors and we’re not paying Rowe’s?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Question has been called. The motion is carried.

---Carried

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Does committee agree that Bill 65, An Act to Amend the Safety Act, is ready for third reading?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

Clause 13. Mr. Dolynny.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 5th Session (day 89)

I’m not disagreeable to this process. I think we need to take distracted driving out of the hands of the drivers in the Northwest Territories. My question to the department is how do we expect this to roll out and do we have a campaign or an advertising campaign to go with this so that people understand and know that there is more severity to the program than we currently have? I know we rolled it out when we doubled the fines. There was a bit of an advertising campaign and it got a little bit of play. Are we expecting that with this type of increase in the suspension area?