Rylund Johnson

Thank you, Madam Chair. Yes. I am going to switch a bit. I have seen different numbers at different times of what the cost per kilometre is. Is there a cost built into replacement, as well? My understanding of the way roads work is that every 30 or 50 years they have to be replaced, and that is built into the amortization in a sense. We amortize the asset over a fixed number of years, but then we also have to replace it again. Is there anywhere in the budget where we are actually reflecting what it costs to replace a highway, beyond just the O and M? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I certainly look forward to the results of that. I think there is also a bit of a national conversation going on with pharmacare, and I think the department is also looking at what is driving health costs everywhere. That's obviously a national conversation. In that regard, I see both medical travel and Extended Health Benefits have quite significant increases from the revised estimates. I will start with: can we get a sense of what is driving the cost in Extended Health Benefits? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I was hoping the Minister would help me understand what the threshold -- in our capital budget, there are a number of highways things. Sometimes, there is chipsealing; sometimes, there is completely rebuilding a highway, a bridge -- just kind of understanding the threshold of what this $85 million of highway operations is spent versus when it all of a sudden gets kicked into becoming a capital expense, what that threshold is. Thank you.

Thank you, Madam Chair. My hope is one day the federal government will extend NIHB to Metis benefits and then that frees up $3 million in our budget, and perhaps we can then find a way to extend it to those 2,200 other people. Along those lines, I look forward to the department doing that work and hopefully getting a cost estimate. Has any work been done about a jurisdictional scan? Are there any other jurisdictions out there who provide some sort of supplementary health benefits to their citizens? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Madam Chair. There is a lot of money being spent here. I'm trying to understand it. The $35 million in utilities on page 251, that would be, essentially, the O and M for the buildings that we own, not the leases? Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Does the department have a cost estimate, or has any work been done to get a cost estimate of what it would cost to provide those 2,200 people some form of supplementary health benefits? Thank you.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I was just waiting for my light to turn on there. I guess the question I am asking is... [Microphone turned off]

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. One of the issues I've struggled with in this work is it kind of seems to be all over government. The open government policy lies with EIA; ATIP implementation, which requires a lot of open disclosure, lies with Justice; the actual records lie with Infrastructure; and the ISSS and the Chief Information Officer lie with Finance. My understanding is that there's a steering committee to kind of coordinate all this work. However, I've never seen any of the work of that steering committee. My question for the Minister is: can there be some public reporting of the open...

Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. I will ask a follow-up question to Finance sometime about what that number is actually looking like and how big of a liability it is to be added to our books. Can I just get clarification of whether asset management is where I would find the deferred maintenance budget, and if so, how much deferred maintenance is in the operations budget? Thank you, Madam Chair.

I think, perhaps, the Minister should also ask the department update her briefing note because I'm going to read from the June transcript where it says by the Minister, "I will have a timeline by the time we are back in the fall as to how exactly this is going to unfold." "Fall" being 2020 there. We're in 2021, Mr. Speaker. My question is: what is the timeline for getting that timeline back to the House?