Sandy Lee

Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you very much. I think we're getting there. I have a follow-up question, Mr. Chairman. On the first, the premium cost has been reduced by $1.6 million. What is the entire amount of the premium?

My second question is if the short-term interest cost savings that we are getting in the amount of $1.7 million, could we rely on that as something that's going to stay a savings for the rest of this fiscal year? How temporary is that? Thank you.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So the net revenue is in the amount of $20 million after taking out the expenses.

I have another question. Where does the money that the Liquor Board gets from the fines and whatever the inspectors do when they go out to bars and give fines to establishments, does that money go into the revolving fund as well and they are available to be used as expenses prior to it being accounted for at the end as part of the surplus or whatever?

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Madam Chair. Further to that, I believe in his budget statement, Madam Chair, the Minister stated that under the proposal being put forward by the federal government on our financing formula, we would only see an increase in the base in the amount of $7.6 million, which is about one-third of what I believe this government is hoping to be able to achieve; about $18 million more annually than what the federal government is proposing. So I would like to ask the Minister whether or not that $7.6 million to the base that the federal government is proposing is for every year going back...

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, I appreciate that. It was only months ago, about six months ago, that one of the last things we did in the last Assembly was to raise the tax on tobacco and alcohol. Am I wrong? I want to know what was the income generated as a result of that tax increase. Did I dream this? I am sure we passed an increase in sin tax before we dissolved. Thank you.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I’d like to ask the Minister whether or not, given the seriousness of this issue on our financial situation and the importance of this issue in our ability to deliver health care programs to our residents in the future, what efforts has the Minister, if any, made to bring this to the attention of our partners and all the aboriginal government leaders? Would this not be something that he should consider bringing into a territorial agenda so that there is as aggressive an action on this issue as there is currently being mobilized for devolution and the...

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wasn’t clear on the Minister’s answer as to exactly what the increased revenue is that the government is getting as a result of the increase in taxes.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wonder if the Minister could advise as to whether or not this Cabinet, this government or any previous government has ever considered launching a legal action against the federal government to put more added pressure and to express our seriousness about the impossible situation and the urgency to resolve this claim. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. May I have a breakdown on the $73,000?

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to waive Rule 93(4) and have Committee Report 2-15(3) moved into Committee of the Whole for today. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Debates of , (day 3)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. On page 3-11, if we are still on that, the deputy minister mentioned that the details for $2.6 million is on the next page, but may I get a breakdown on the details on the difference between $3.1 million and $2.6 million? Thank you.