Sandy Lee

We need to consider separate factors from what the Member has suggested. What he’s saying is we should be able to neatly budget what the costs will be and have better control, although that’s one definition of control.

The second thing is, are you just going to spend and spend and spend and not have control? In health care we need a third factor, which is what we’ve been saying all along, that we are working within the system to be ready to respond to manage our resources wisely, but there is no way you are going to have a budget that is going to anticipate, predict and neatly categorize that...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We do do that. We do on-the-land treatment programs and it is part of our programming. I do admit that we have a bit of a patchwork funding, because it depends on the money we have in the department as well as some funding sources that we could find with the federal government. We approve those on an application-by-application basis. I agree with the Member that on-the-land addiction programs are a desirable way to go and one that I would support getting more of. I agree with the Member that we don’t have a comprehensive, across-the-board, all across the NWT...

The Member is absolutely right. We will ask to have that reworded. Thank you.

Introducing an income threshold for determining eligibility about medical escort would be a policy change. If that’s what the Members would like to consider, that’s something that needs to be discussed and changed in the policy and we know how difficult it is to determine eligibility of house benefits by income. I personally believe we should help those who need the help the most, and often it’s those who are under low income.

Mr. Chairman, as I stated, we are reviewing the Medical Travel Policy and there will be some recommendations coming out of that. Under current policy there is room for...

I need the Member to tell me how we determine the working poor if we don’t talk about income. Who are they? It’s everybody who’s not covered, right? So if we’re going to cover working poor without determining income, that means we are covering everybody. Everybody. I agree that might be something that everybody wants to do, some people might want to do. But we’re no longer then talking about working poor. We’re talking about having universal supplementary health benefits for everybody who lives in the Northwest Territories. That is a good public policy debate to have. We don’t have working...

We’re back to page 8-21 and $41.920 million for physicians in the Territories.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. To my left is Paddy Meade, deputy minister of Health and Social Services. To my right is Mr. Derek Elkin, director of finance. To my far right is Mr. Dana Heide, assistant deputy minister of operations.

My door is open, we can talk about it anytime. We do and we have and we will continue to talk about this. Thank you.

I don’t see why we cannot contemplate that, and if that’s what the Member would like to see, then it’s something that we, as the government and the Legislature, especially in transition could consider. I would caution, though, that I don’t believe there is any evidence that says that if you had one authority, that would be the silver bullet fixer to managing finances. Alberta is a recent example of that. They blew up the boards, they tried to find efficiencies, and I don’t think there is any evidence to show that they are in any way saving their money.

We have a governance review that we are...

Mr. Speaker, absolutely. I am always happy to go before the committee and have discussions with them. Thank you.