Sandy Lee

Range Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

The Member is right; the accounts receivable is one of the factors, but it’s not the biggest or the largest cost driver. I’m pleased to advise the House that it’s this government and this Minister that has signed an agreement. We have now a written agreement with the Nunavut government. We negotiated for two years and we signed in February of 2010. Most of the receivables we have with Nunavut are current. We have an outstanding amount with respect to Nunavut residents we have in extended care, because there were no real written agreements for the last 10 years. So we have finalized that, we...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

Yes, I don’t think we have the exact numbers of nursing positions there, but we could get back to the Member on that.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We are doing some work in Fort Simpson to do “upgrades.” We are also in the books for doing future studies on Simpson Health Centre. Ms. Meade has more information on other work being done in that region.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

I thought I answered the question on the long-term care facility. It’s a GNWT facility. We’re going to build it. Health and Social Services will own it. It will be a GNWT asset. We’ll provide O and M for it. Tlicho Community Services Agency doesn’t have anything to do with it.

The reason I wanted to follow up is that I know we have some lease arrangement on the health centre for a part of it. I don’t know if it’s the office or what, because we’ve done some renovations there. They’re not related. That’s not related to this project. This is a GNWT facility.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The projected deficit for Stanton at the end of 2011 is $10,185,663 and the system-wide deficit projected for 2011 is $16,860,299. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The part of planning study would have included the programs that would be offered in these facilities and planning on what the staffing makeup would be. I’d ask the DM to give more information on that.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The planning study money is for this fiscal year and at the end of that we should have a detailed plan on the need and the functional programming and the total dollar amount for Stanton. So I can’t say it’s going to be in the books next year, but it will be working through the process.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 22)

The B-C health centre has to be in the community so that we have access to physicians.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

As I stated to the Member for Great Slave, one of the criteria for the new funding is for us to exit THAF funding. This new funding ends at the end of 2012. We fund doctors, we fund midwifery, we fund diagnostic imaging. We fund lots of other things under THAF right now and we’re finding ways to work out the details on how we spend THSSI funding. Part of transitioning means system change as well. This is why it’s important for us to get details on exactly what the federal government has asked us to do with THSSI, what we have agreed to do.

Once again, the respite care is a small program that’s...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 5th Session (day 19)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We’ve been working with all the authorities to come up with a comprehensive plan on transitioning from THAF to THSSI, because the pot of money we’re getting from the feds is not the same, the criteria is not the same, the amount of money that we’re getting is not the same. It was important that we work with the authorities to come up with a plan; a plan so that we don’t work to cross purposes, that we do a full analysis of how we’re spending this money. It did come as a surprise to me that this letter went out and it was communicated in that way. I have a commitment...