Wendy Bisaro

Thanks to the Minister for that commitment. I hope that we will see it sooner rather than later. If it’s in her office, I guess that means sooner.

To the Minister: if this is a strategic document and it guides the department, I would think that it should be reactive to new info and it should be a living and breathing document. So I’d like to ask the Minister what actions identified under the Foundation for Change document, the actions which presumably are on her desk, deal with recommendations from the Child and Family Services Act review report?

Can the Minister advise if there is any money within this budget within the department to start planning for that capital replacement?

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions today are addressed to the Minister of Health and Social Services. In my statement I presented my perception of the Foundation for Change strategic document that the department is currently using. So my first question to the Minister today is to ask whether or not she can confirm that I’ve understood it correctly and can she define for me and for the people listening the purpose of the Foundation for Change? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thanks for the explanation. There’s lots going on and I understand that much of it is probably efficiencies as opposed to savings, but I’d appreciate an explanation from either the Minister or the deputy minister as to sort of what the expectations are. Will all these changes end up basically allowing us to spend the same money for more, or are we anticipating that we’ll get some savings through these changes? Thank you.

I’m referring to the text on page 8-16, the last paragraph.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thanks for that clarification as well. I did wonder in terms of the medical travel review and I certainly support an evaluation of sort of the clinical decisions and how we do that, but it’s my understanding that the Program Review Office is also undertaking to look at medical travel and efficiencies there. I wondered if these two reviews are being done in conjunction. Thank you.

Thanks for the explanation. It does go back to a pet peeve of mine, which I’ve been harping on since I got here. We’re being asked to approve $1.1 million basically without any kind of other information. So could I get a breakdown, please, of what the $1.1 million of THSSI funding is being used for? Thank you.

So does that mean that it is a shuffling of the money from one pot to another and nothing has changed, the totals haven’t changed? I need an interpretation. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I beg your indulgence and ask if we can return to page 8-13.

Okay. Have we made changes, then, to the implementation of the program, or was it in anticipation and they may perhaps not be needed?