Wendy Bisaro

Frame Lake

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thanks for the information. I guess it leads me to then ask whether or not this is an increase that we can continue to expect. Our actuals in 2008-09 were about the same, $12 million. We then estimated quite a bit less in 2009-10 and now we’ve gone back up in 2010-11. So is $12 million or almost $13 million a better number in terms of our ongoing expenditures or is this a bit of an anomaly? I know it’s hard to predict how many kids we are going to have to send out, but is this an indication of a trend, I guess, that we’re going to continue to see?

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I MOVE, seconded by the honourable Member for Thebacha, that, notwithstanding Rule 4, when this House adjourns on Thursday, February 4, 2010, it shall be adjourned until Monday, February 8, 2010;

AND FURTHER, that any time prior to February 8, 2010, if the Speaker is satisfied, after consultation with the Executive Council and Members of the Legislative Assembly, that the public interest requires that the House should meet at an earlier time during the adjournment, the Speaker may give notice and thereupon the House shall meet at the time stated in such notice and shall...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

I guess the Minister and I will have to agree to disagree. I think that the office of an ombudsman is known to be impartial and known to be independent. I don’t think that MLAs and Ministers and department people are going to be impartial and independent from any dispute in which they are involved. There is nothing that allows an individual to appeal a particular decision unless there is actually an appeal board. If the appeal board turns them down, they have nowhere to go accept the court. So I reiterate again that an office is needed.

I would like to ask the Minister... He says that he is...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned in my Member’s statement, it was about 20 months ago, May of 2008 actually, when I asked the Minister of Justice questions in regard to an ombudsman’s office and whether or not the department would consider establishing one. The answer from the Minister at that time was that they needed to do some consultation with community, renters, tenants, department, Members and so on. I’d like to ask the Minister, at this point, what progress has been made in the last 20 months towards the establishment of an ombudsman’s office. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

I have spoken in my general comments about the need for Stanton to be redeveloped, redesigned, refurbished. I think the Minister knows as well as anybody, it’s a 20-year-old building and we need to get planning sooner rather than later. It’s our only territorial hospital. When can we expect that there will be money for the hospital for the Stanton hospital to do the development of a master development plan? Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

That is the business plan, Mr. Chairman, and if the Minister needs to get back to me, that is fine.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

I am not quite sure that I understood what I heard. There is a trio of departments that are looking at this particular framework, but what information is the Minister going to give me? I am looking for a revised framework. If it is not being revised, then that is fine, then tell me that. But when will we get this revised framework, if it is indeed being revised? Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 22)

That certainly makes sense. The other question I had is in program delivery details and there is a very large jump between last year’s revised main estimates and this year’s budgeted mains. We go from $20.5 million to just over $26 million for adult continuing care services. Is there a specific reason for that? Is it a number of factors? If I could have an explanation, please. Thank you.

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 21)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to follow up on a question I asked yesterday. It doesn’t technically belong in this section. I think it does apply, because I am talking about the provision of physician and clinical services and so on. I asked yesterday about reciprocal billing and what we receive from Nunavut for the services that we provide to people in Nunavut communities. I understood the answer, but Ms. Meade stated that the agreements and the contract in place are in place verbally and that they are finalizing the language. I am considering it a second time. I thought, oh, my. That is a...

Debates of , 16th Assembly, 4th Session (day 21)

Mr. Speaker, I guess I have to take from the Minister’s answer... That was a simple yes or no question. I don’t think I heard either yes or no in that answer. So I have to assume there is no one document. I didn’t ask for a new department. I asked for a document.

Mr. Speaker, the GNWT has a Greenhouse Gas Strategy. I believe that we have a target within that strategy. It is probably outdated, but I believe that we have one. I would like to know what our government is doing to include our communities and all of our residents as individuals in setting and meeting their own greenhouse gas targets...