Debates of June 5, 2006 (day 5)

Mahsi cho, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the fate of the flat-rate power debate, one-rate zone, what is it? What are we debating about? How will it affect me and my constituents? These are questions constituents have been expressing to me over and over again. The Public Utilities Board is submitting the rates that is due this fall. Under the current situation, large and hydro communities benefit while small communities that rely on diesel powered generators will be hit hard. When I think of this government’s approach on the flat-rate debate, I ask, can this government evaluate all the impacts that changes will have on the communities? I believe we can. Can this government thoroughly explore other options mutually beneficial to all NWT residents? I believe we can. Can this government discuss and consult these issues with the communities? I believe we can. Will this government work with the PUB to compose and approve an equitable ratio to all residents? I believe we can.

Mr. Speaker, I also ask, is this government going to approach a dramatic increase in the cost of fuel with the status quo or, even worse, start offloading costs onto the communities through a complex and unfair formula or a non per capita basis? The Northwest Territories is always talking about a red hot economy and using this as a reason why certain things are done or certain services are reduced. As an MLA, we all have the honour and privilege of talking with our residents, our youth and our elders. Lately, these discussions have been primary on increasing costs of living in the small and remote communities.

Last winter, the MLAs asked the various ministries to be proactive rather than reactive to what was inevitable. Many constituents have stated that with the escalating costs of living, choices in healthy living is quickly becoming a lifestyle for the privileged. The phrase "one-rate zone" means that families do not have to choose between food or power, trading living needs for fuel. When this government discusses the flat rate debate, we should consider that we don’t approach our community services differently when it comes to health care or education, so why central utilities, Mr. Speaker? Mahsi cho.

---Applause