Debates of May 26, 2005 (day 2)

Topics
Statements

Members, for your information, the first hour-and-a-half of our session today will be interpreted in South Slavey.

Also, I would like to draw Members’ attention to the gallery today. There is a very enthusiastic group of teachers, parents and chaperones up there from Grade 6 classes from Hay River. Welcome to the Legislative Assembly. I hope you enjoy the proceedings.

---Applause

Minister’s Statement 3-15(4): Fiscal Update

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to update Members and NWT residents on this government’s fiscal position and outlook.

When I presented the budget in February, we were looking at a fairly positive fiscal situation, both in the short and long term. At that time, we forecast a 2004-05 year-end operating surplus of about $44 million, primarily the result of the increases to our formula funding grant and federal health transfers arising from last fall’s First Ministers meetings.

Despite receiving these additional funds, our interim public accounts will show an $18 million deficit for the year 2004-05, as a result of retroactive changes to corporate income tax entitlements, along with booking a liability for the Giant Mine remediation.

The corporate tax changes relate to a refund to a company filing an amended corporate tax return for the 2000 tax year, claiming subsequent offsetting capital losses against previous income. This claim is expected to reduce GNWT corporate taxes by $36 million. Given that the federal government has been the primary beneficiary of previous large corporate income tax windfalls, we believe it is incumbent on Canada to compensate the GNWT for this lost revenue. If we receive a positive response to our claim to Canada, we will reflect this in an upward revenue adjustment on the grant side. At this time, however, our accounts must reflect the lower tax revenue.

The second issue relates to the conclusion of a cooperation agreement with Canada respecting the Giant Mine remediation project. This agreement means that we will be accruing a liability of $23 million to reflect the

GNWT’s share of the liability of this remediation. Approval for this expenditure will be sought in a supplementary appropriation.

These are both one-time events which will not affect future fiscal years’ revenues or expenditures, although the reduction in CIT will have a temporary effect on tax revenues in the next few years as it works through the federal process of tax estimates and adjustments.

Mr. Speaker, on the positive side, our current outlook for the present fiscal year is only marginally lower than the February forecast.

We continue to face the same uncertainty, however, regarding our fiscal arrangements with Canada that I outlined in the budget. New rules for formula financing after 2005-06 will not be established until after the federal Expert Panel on Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing provides its recommendations. The panel is scheduled to report in late 2005. In addition, we are still discussing the terms of a resource revenue sharing arrangement with Canada and the Aboriginal Summit. Until these issues are resolved, we cannot predict with certainty our revenue levels or how economic growth will affect our fiscal situation.

There are many outstanding federal-territorial issues, in addition to formula financing and resource revenue sharing, which will affect our fiscal situation and our ability to pursue our goals. These include the need to deal with the social and economic impacts of development on our residents and our communities, the need to change the borrowing limit, the negotiation of federal gas tax funding for communities, and many more.

Mr. Speaker, our fiscal relationship with Canada is at a critical point. Canada must recognize that if we can make progress on these issues in ways that reflect the unique circumstances in which the Northwest Territories finds itself, we can make lasting changes that can permanently improve the quality of life for NWT residents and benefit Canada as a whole.

The revenue and expenditure changes I have just discussed today do not warrant change to our basic fiscal strategy. We will continue to pursue the fiscal responsibility policy I outlined in the budget in February. Our territory’s economic prospects remain strong. The recent decision by De Beers to proceed with the Snap Lake diamond mine will support strong economic growth in 2005 and 2006. We remain optimistic that the Mackenzie gas project will proceed on schedule.

Mr. Speaker, we will continue to follow the path outlined in the budget. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Minister’s Statement 4-15(4): GNWT Actions To Support Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Project

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to provide the House with an update on the Mackenzie gas project. On April 27, 2005, Imperial Oil Limited, on behalf of the Mackenzie Gas Producers Group, announced a shift of attention from engineering studies to an increased focus on the pressing regulatory issues associated with the proposed Mackenzie gas project. The producers group also expressed the view that the economic demands in access and benefit negotiations were beyond the scope of what properly constitutes those agreements.

The producers group also made it clear that they expected the federal and territorial governments to address socioeconomic impact requirements along the pipeline route. Mr. Speaker, we are in the process of doing that. GNWT and aboriginal leaders have asked the federal government to provide funding to deal with socioeconomic needs in the Mackenzie Valley. We have received a commitment from the Deputy Prime Minister and other federal Ministers that they will provide funding to do this and we are now working to determine an appropriate amount.

Mr. Speaker, we have also taken steps to support communities in this process. The GNWT is sponsoring three regional social impact workshops in Fort Simpson, Norman Wells and Inuvik in late May and June.

---Applause

The workshops will allow residents to discuss socioeconomic concerns and help identify the best ways to deal with impacts.

Mr. Speaker, we are optimistic that the successful resolution of the socioeconomic issues surrounding this project will allow aboriginal organizations and the Mackenzie Gas Producers Group to work towards a successful conclusion of the access and benefit agreements.

While the proponents did defer some work on the project, the regulatory process continues and so do our efforts in this area. Through the Mackenzie Valley pipeline office, our departments are working together to identify impacts and solutions. The GNWT is also fully engaged in the regulatory review. Our departments are working together with both the National Energy Board and the Joint Review Panel processes to ensure the interests of the Northwest Territories are protected.

The GNWT also recently announced $1.3 million to help communities plan for the Mackenzie gas project. My colleague, the Minister of Municipal and Community Affairs, will provide the House with more details on this initiative later today.

Mr. Speaker, the GNWT has taken a number of important steps to facilitate the effective development of the Mackenzie gas project. We continue to believe the project will provide many positive benefits for the territory, but most importantly this project will benefit our residents and provide opportunities that would not otherwise exist. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Minister's Statement 5-15(4): Preparing For The Pipeline: Financial Support To Community Governments

Mr. Speaker, community governments in the Mackenzie Valley are facing many challenges in preparing for the proposed Mackenzie gas pipeline project.

As well as getting ready for the complex review process involved with the project, community governments also need to plan for impacts that this project and the exploration and development activity associated with the pipeline will have on their communities.

Minister Bell and I heard this message loud and clear at the Preparing for the Pipeline Community Leaders Conference sponsored by the Department of Municipal and Community Affairs in Inuvik last December.

We heard this message again at regional workshops in the Deh Cho and during meetings with community leaders over the winter and spring.

In response to concerns raised by community governments and by Members of this Assembly, I am pleased to inform the Assembly that the Government of the Northwest Territories has recently approved new funding for community governments to prepare for the pipeline.

---Applause

Community governments will receive nearly $1.3 million this year to assist in assessing the impacts of the proposed pipeline, and to prepare strategies to maximize benefits and minimize any potential negative impacts.

The Department of Municipal and Community Affairs will provide $20,000 to 21 communities affected by the pipeline to assist in preparing their communities for the regulatory review process. To date, all but two of the eligible community governments have applied for this funding.

Further funding of up to $30,000 per community will be available to review proposals, assess impacts, negotiate community access agreements and undertake general planning and preparation. Community governments eligible to apply for this extra funding include the 21 affected communities and Yellowknife, which is an intervener in the review process.

Mr. Speaker, the Government of the Northwest Territories is of the view that all communities may experience some impacts from the project. Therefore, we have made up to $15,000 available to each of the remaining 11 community governments in the Northwest Territories to help them review, plan for, and assess any potential impacts or opportunities for their community as a result of the pipeline construction.

We have also secured funding for some essential support work. This work includes two more regional workshops planned for the Sahtu and the Beaufort-Delta regions, and funding to assist community governments to research and analyze common issues. This research and assistance may include engineering, infrastructure and legal research and advice.

Mr. Speaker, the Government of the Northwest Territories recognizes that community governments need support to better participate in the review of the environmental impact statement and the regulatory review process. Communities must be able to address capacity shortfalls that could result from the added workload associated with preparing for the pipeline. On behalf of my colleagues, I am pleased to announce that the government will provide this support. Thank you.

---Applause

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Item 2, Ministers’ statements. Members, before we go to the next item, I would like to inform Members that as well as South Slavey interpreters today, we also have Tlicho interpreters for the first hour-and-a-half.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Ban On Overproof Alcohol Needed

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, we all know the devastating addiction problems we are having in the Northwest Territories. Addictions are ruining our communities and our homes. Alcohol is one of the worst addictions in our communities. With alcohol, we don’t have to find someone to sell it to you. You don’t have to search in back alleys, as it’s always available in communities. In fact, in magazines and on television, they encourage you to buy it and buy a lot of it because they say it will make your life better and you will have more fun with it. Well, they couldn’t be more wrong, Mr. Speaker. I may not be able to get all the alcohol banned from the Northwest Territories, but I would like to see overproof banned from our liquor stores.

Mr. Speaker, regular alcohol is 40 percent proof, but overproof alcohol can be as high as 160 percent. We shouldn’t consider it a legal substance. Transport Canada has already labelled overpoof alcohol as a dangerous good. Why can’t we do that with liquor in the Northwest Territories? When people get hold of overproof alcohol, they don’t realize how dangerous it could be to them and their families. It’s easier to smuggle into communities than beer or wine, which means people get addicted to the real hard substance. They build a tolerance to this level of alcohol and they need more and more to get high.

Alcohol is a controlled substance. We have the power to stop the overproof alcohol from being sold here in the Northwest Territories. Mr. Speaker, I want to ask the government to put into some sort of legislation that overproof alcohol will be prohibited from the Northwest Territories. Thank you.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Concerns Over Uncertain Pipeline Future

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, it’s good to hear the Minister of MACA make a statement this morning with regard to the pipeline.

Mr. Speaker, since the announcement of Imperial Oil Limited, on behalf of the proponents of the Mackenzie gas project, to suspend future technical work along the Mackenzie Valley, there have been aboriginal groups, business people and people in general concern about the future of the proposed pipeline along the Mackenzie Valley.

Many people, Mr. Speaker, in the Beaufort-Delta are concerned and so they should be. Owners of small businesses are trying to decide whether to make any future investments to get ready for the pipeline in light of the uncertainty.

Mr. Speaker, some aboriginal groups consider this as a threat by Imperial Oil to have their own way, but let me tell this government we should not take this announcement as a threat but as a wake-up call for the federal government to respond to the concerns raised by our government and the aboriginal groups for funding to address the social and infrastructure needs of the Northwest Territories.

Mr. Speaker, I have worked for industry before and if we think Imperial Oil and their partners are just talking the talk, let me tell you they will pack up just like in the mid '70s and early '80s if the federal government does not respond to these concerns.

I have been to many meetings in the Beaufort-Delta, Mr. Speaker, representing both aboriginal groups and municipalities over the last 30 years. Many times issues such as lack of schools, community halls and roads in small communities were raised by individuals. Today, Mr. Speaker, these same issues are being raised by communities, in particular when proponents are in attendance. Communities always request industry to provide money for these infrastructure requirements. The industry’s response has always been that it is the government’s responsibility, and they continue to say that. This is where I agree that government must step up to the plate and address the needs and concerns of the communities.

Mr. Speaker, if the Mackenzie gas project does not become a reality or should be delayed, I will continue to be relying on the federal government for a handout. Mr. Speaker, I would like to request more time to finish my statement. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. Pokiak. The Member is seeking unanimous consent to conclude his statement. Are there any nays? There are no nays. You may conclude your statement, Mr. Pokiak.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is important that we have an agreement-in-principle for the resource revenue for the diamond mines and petroleum projects should the pipeline become a reality.

In closing, Mr. Speaker, I urge this government to respond to the concerns raised by the aboriginal groups and municipalities and general public for the needed funds to address the social impacts and infrastructure needs of all the Northwest Territories’ communities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Congratulations To Arctic College Graduates From Tu Nedhe

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to proudly mention some educational achievements within the NWT and, more specifically, within my constituency of Tu Nedhe.

I attended the Aurora College Thebacha Campus convocation on April 18th in Fort Smith last month to celebrate with and congratulate 11 of my constituents that have graduated from four different programs.

Mr. Speaker, I’d like to extend my congratulations to Eliza Beaulieu, Jennifer Beaulieu, Doris Catholique, Helen McCallum, Jill Rymer, Eva Villeneuve and Loretta Edjericon for the completion of the Home and Community Support Workers Certification Program.

I’d also like to congratulate Suzanne Boucher and Kara King for receiving their management studies certificates, and John Catholique of Lutselk’e for his achievement in attaining his diploma in social work.

And last, but not least, my congratulations go out to Carol-Ann Chaplin of Fort Resolution for receiving her management studies diploma. Ms. Chaplin is also the 2005 Aurora College class valedictorian for this special occasion.

Mr. Speaker, I want to express my sincere pride towards all these graduates of Tu Nedhe, and especially to Loretta Edjericon, who exemplifies the importance of determination and perseverance required to fulfill one’s goals. As she is considered an elder in my community of Deninu Kue, she has definitely shown all who were present at the ceremonies that you are never too old to formally start educating your mind. There’s an important message to all the students in the gallery.

Hear! Hear!

---Applause

With that, Mr. Speaker, I look forward to attending more celebrations of achievement by my constituents of Tu Nedhe, and I again say kudos to Loretta Edjericon on your achievements and congratulations to all the Tu Nedhe graduates of 2005. Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Relocation Of The Territorial Treatment Centre To Hay River

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Part of our work here requires that we make tough decisions. Along with that responsibility and expectation, Mr. Speaker, comes the essential, the absolutely essential need in this House that we also have tough consultations to help make those decisions good ones that we can all accept and can all work with.

Mr. Speaker, in the matter of the relocation, the government now says done deal to move the Territorial Treatment Centre from Yellowknife to Hay River. We were denied that essential, that very essential expectation of coming to us and talking to us and helping us make sure that we have a hand in making decisions as difficult as this that affect the lives and careers of employees and families and children who are going to be disrupted in this.

Mr. Speaker, I’m going to continue to demand, on behalf of constituents, people here in Yellowknife, the families and the workers, that we are given this opportunity. Too often, Mr. Speaker, Members on this side of the House are treated casually, I would say sometimes disrespectfully, when it comes to getting our views on various actions; and then on the basis of only the most casual, cursory discussion, decisions are made. This is not how consensus government is going to succeed. In fact, it may be one of the things that causes its downfall, because this side of the Assembly has got to be able to represent our constituents as fully as possible and the government cannot decide arbitrarily to sidestep that.

I am going to continue, Mr. Speaker, to demand that that obligation be fulfilled on this matter and every other issue that comes along. When tough decisions are required, let’s have those tough consultations. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Impacts Of The Closure Of The South Mackenzie Correctional Centre Remand Unit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, yesterday I said that I wanted to follow up on more detail about the effects of the closure of the remand unit at the South Mackenzie Correctional Centre in Hay River. We knew that there would be a reduction in shifts available for casual employees. We knew that the number of indeterminate positions would be reduced by five if when they became vacant through attrition, and we knew that the projected savings of $400,000 was not realistic. What wasn’t quantified was the consequential effects that weren’t fully anticipated or wouldn’t be realized until the actual change in operations took place. These are the ones which we are becoming more aware of now and they are the ones that I want to talk about today.

I was assured during the budget session that the holding and transporting of inmates was not going to negatively impact RCMP detachment budgets, and I didn’t accept that then and now I’m starting to hear how this is playing out. In a detachment like Hay River, where cells might have normally been occupied for four or five days a month with the accompanying staffing on-call guards, now there’s only four or five days a month when the cells at the RCMP detachment aren’t being used for remanded persons in custody. There have been some recent arrests where there have been five people charged at one time around some well-publicized drug cases.

I’ve recently learned that these inmates being transferred on scheduled flights on commercial carriers, that there’s a rule pertaining to their transportation, and that is being that one officer cannot be responsible for more than two prisoners. This is a good and understandable rule, but one that will cost the RCMP more money to transport inmates to and from Yellowknife. I don’t believe that these additional costs paid for from detachment budgets are not going to affect the delivery of policing services at the community level, not to mention the fact that there is going to be a decreased presence of RCMP members in our community at any given time.

Another bit of feedback that has come in is how remand inmates being located in Yellowknife is affecting the JPs’ court scheduling. JPs are being pressured to plan their schedules and disposition of charges and cases around the convenience of getting the accused back and forth to Yellowknife. Now, this is not a very good way to run a justice system.

Another impact of the remand closure, that I hope and pray this government doesn't have to face, has to do with safety of prisoners who may attempt self-destructive measures while incarcerated. The staffing...

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Mrs. Groenewegen, your time for your Member's statement has expired.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to seek unanimous consent to conclude my statement. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

The honourable Member is seeking unanimous consent to conclude her statement. Are there any nays? There are no nays. You may conclude your statement, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you, colleagues. The staffing of the remand unit in Hay River and the additional staff to watch them had everything to do with an internal report and a coroner's inquest into the suicidal death of an inmate in custody at SMCC. I don't believe that that report and the recommendations of the coroner were sufficiently considered when this cost-saving initiative was contrived by the former Minister.

I think it would be in the government's own interest to ensure that we have not inadvertently put ourselves in a situation where responsibility for, God forbid, another such incident could be directly blamed on these changes.

I would like to see the changes in remand in Hay River re-examined in view of a more rigorous analysis taking into account three things, Mr. Speaker: the recent number of inmates remanded in custody; the examination of the impacts on RCMP manpower, programs and budgets; and consultation with judges and justices of the peace south of the lake. I will be asking the Minister of Justice about this in question period. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member's Statement On Expanded Downpayment Assistance Program Concerns

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I rise today with serious concerns regarding the Housing Corporation and how it is running its EDAP program. That is the Expanded Downpayment Assistance Program.

Mr. Speaker, first and foremost I am really glad to see that we are putting people into home ownership and I think that is the bottom line that I really like to see. However, there are serious concerns in regard to how we treat our down payment. We are now treating it as a big handout as opposed to the help-up that I have always believed it should be.

Mr. Speaker, I posed some sound questions to this Minister to get some clarification. I went to his office and I said can you help me understand why we are giving big down payments out? Can you give them to me internally? Maybe even in private? But no, I was refused answers, so I am now forced to ask them publicly for public clarification.

Mr. Speaker, to make my point clearer; one person in particular received $72,000 as a down payment in the Downpayment Assistance Program. I can't think of anything to say other than this is completely out of touch for what is considered reasonable. Is $72,000 reasonable for down payment assistance? It concerns me. I don't think that is fair. Seventy-two thousand dollars is totally out of perspective. It often reminds me of what a friend of mine says; some things just ain't right, and to me that ain't right.

The Downpayment Assistance Program to me, Mr. Speaker, means $5,000, $10,000, $15,000, maybe even $20,000 to help a person on low income to get into home ownership. Seventy-two thousand dollars, again, is completely out of touch. Mr. Speaker, I did an average of the 14 contributions in the city of Yellowknife and it was an average of $33,000. That is a lot of taxpayer money, where the lowest on the list of 14 was $6,500.

Mr. Speaker, I imagine that the person who received $6,500 was completely thankful to the government; they probably loved them. But $72,000 seems a little out of touch.

Mr. Speaker, to further emphasize this point; for new construction, someone was given $109,000 to build a house from our housing program. Doesn't that seem out of touch? As far as I am concerned, that just doesn't seem right. It took my wife and I five years to save $25,000 and we were really proud of that, so $109,000, Mr. Speaker, to work out into taxable income is a lot of money. That is all I can say. Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to conclude my statement.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

The honourable Member is seeking unanimous consent to conclude his statement. Are there any nays? There are no nays. You may proceed, Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I was seeking clarity into the situation of why someone would receive $72,000. Is our goal as a Housing Corporation, is the government trying to make sure that they only pay a $200 a month mortgage? I don't know. Those are the kinds of questions that I was asking the Minister.

The program is based, if you read their web site, on a sliding scale. What is that sliding scale? A lot of the applicants that I have spoken to who have received money don't even know how much they are getting until the day the cheque is cut, at the end of the process. Mr. Speaker, what I am asking for is some clarity. We need some clear-cut charts; we need some graphs; we need some statistics; we need some openness, honesty and transparency on this.

By the way, five or six people out of these 14 people received over $50,000 in assistance from the Housing Corporation. Again, this is sort of out of touch and, like I stated, as my friend says, that ain't right.

Mr. Speaker, later today I will be asking for clarity; absolute clarity from the Minister responsible for the Housing Corporation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member's Statement On Prince Of Wales Northern Heritage Centre Renovations

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to speak today about a vital piece of our tourism product here in the Northwest Territories. Built in 1979 and named after the Prince of Wales, our Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre is an absolute cornerstone of the tourism products that we have to offer. On the eve of what is looking like a very busy summer season, I am very concerned and alarmed that the centre sits in the state that it sits today.

As a young man I used to work at the centre and I have always held the centre in the highest regard. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for all of the staff that work at that centre. My concern is that I don't believe we are giving the centre the resources to conclude the renovations currently underway. We have booked $8.5 million for renovations and it seems to be never ending, Mr. Speaker.

It has been difficult on staff and it is difficult on the visitors. I can understand and appreciate the difficulties in having renovations taking place and the fact that not all of the exhibits and galleries can be open to the public. However, not unlike any other citizen of this city, when I get relatives in town to visit, the first place I want to show them is our world-class museum.

A few weeks ago I took my uncle to visit the museum. I was shocked that not only were the north and south main galleries closed, but also the aviation gallery was locked and being used as a storage area. I started thinking about just how many other people were being denied seeing all the fabulous artefacts and displays that were in these galleries. Why would we shut down three galleries at a time? Of course, I know it is going to be better when it is all done; but why is it taking so long?

With the completion of Highway No. 3 getting close to being done, we will see an increase in road traffic this summer and also Yellowknife is gearing up to play host in July to the Assembly of First Nations national assembly which will bring thousands of visitors to our city. If the museum is in the same state today as it was when I was there a few weeks ago, something has to be done.

In addition to the galleries being shut down, the carpet in the main public areas is in serious need of replacement. I will ask the Minister some questions about the renovations and what the plans are for the facility going forward at the appropriate time. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member's Statement On Lack Of Support For The Fort Simpson Summer Student Program

Mr. Speaker, mahsi cho. (English not provided)

…wide variety of services throughout the summer, critical to tourism, recreation and youth activities through a partnership with the GNWT Youth Employment Program.

Throughout the last three years, the village has received enough partnership funding for nine to 11 summer student positions, ranging from staff for the community pool, tourism information centre and many other summer youth activities.

This year the village will only be able to hire one person with the assistance of the Education, Culture and Employment Youth Employment Program. This program also gave the youth experience, skills, responsibilities and the ability to save money for academics in the fall. The confidence that the youth received from these employment programs is invaluable to the development of themselves and the communities.

Many constituents have asked me during my most recent community tour, why the sudden and drastic cuts. The Youth Employment Program under the Wage Subsidy Program has been virtually removed from the base funding. This program was very well used in the community of Fort Simpson, by the village and many other businesses. The program is not intended as a yearly funding source for organizations to deliver programs, ECE responded. If this is the case, the communities have a difference in understanding. ECE did not give adequate notice to the communities so the applicants could prepare accordingly and in time. Today, many communities are in the position to cancel summer youth employment targets. If the community governments were not faced with the increasing costs and decreasing revenue, they may have the capacity to continue with the programs. The reality is that they do not.

Mr. Speaker, it is appropriate that we have a gallery full of students and our government should do our best for them as they are our future. Mahsi cho.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On City Of Yellowknife “Heterosexual Day”

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to express my disappointment in how my beloved city of Yellowknife is being advertised around the country as a city so insecure in its identity as to feel the need to celebrate a heterosexual day.

---Laughter

Mr. Speaker, as one council member put it so succinctly, I find this to be extremely frivolous and vexatious and a real mockery of the day of celebration hard fought and won by one of the most marginalized and victimized people in our society. Mr. Speaker, I believe no matter where people stand on the issue of gay rights, most reasonable and sensitive people will not condone an elected body actively advocating and practising discrimination and bigotry.

Mr. Speaker, in case this is not patently obvious to everyone, every day is a heterosexual day in this country and every part of the world. Heterosexual teenagers do not get murdered and beaten up for their sexual identity. Heterosexual spouses are not refused a visit to the bedside of a dying life mate because of their sexual identity. Heterosexual people are not denied the rights to the properties and wealth of their deceased spouse because of their identity. There are no aboriginal heterosexual youth who are forced to move into bigger communities because of their sexual identity.

Mr. Speaker, there are very serious and compelling reasons for us to mark the days like Gay Pride Day, International Day for the Elimination of Discrimination on March 21st, or National Aboriginal Day on June 21st. Wouldn’t it be totally ridiculous if someone suggested that we declare every day of the year other than June 21st non-aboriginal day?

Mr. Speaker, I have suggested many times before that an elected leader should act as an elected leader and fight for the basic human rights of everyone, because as someone born and raised as a girl in a developing country, and a person of a visible minority community in Canada, I know a thing or two about being discriminated against. When I was young, like the students sitting in the gallery, I remember saying to myself that if I ever became successful and got somewhere in life, I would speak out for those people who are being oppressed by the majority and who are not able to defend themselves.

Mr. Speaker, none of us should have a monopoly on basic human rights and Charter rights we hold dear. Whenever we see someone do that…

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Ms. Lee, your time for your Member’s statement has expired.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. May I seek unanimous consent to conclude my statement?

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

The Member is seeking unanimous consent to conclude her statement. Are there any nays? There are no nays. Ms. Lee, you may continue your statement.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would just like to conclude by saying that none of us should have a monopoly on basic human rights and Charter rights we hold so dear. Whenever we see someone do that, especially an elected body, good people and especially the leader should stand up and say that should not be tolerated. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Member’s Statement On Support For The Mackenzie Valley Gas Pipeline

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, 30 years ago, Thomas Berger put a 10-year moratorium on the pipeline in order to allow land claims to be settled and to allow northern communities to prepare for the construction. Twenty years have passed since that moratorium ended and most of us, like northern businesses, have been busy preparing and trying to build capacity in order to capitalize on the pipeline.

Unfortunately, some of us, even 20 years later, are still not ready, Mr. Speaker. For instance, one group is holding the future of the pipeline hostage while they try to negotiate their land claim settlement. This group already has two pipelines from their settlement areas going south. We didn’t try and hold them up in their development because it would not have been fair. Now I think we deserve the same respect. We need a champion, Mr. Speaker, to get this pipeline going. Mr. Handley, Nellie Cournoyea, and Fred Carmichael are all trying to champion the cause in order to get the benefits of the pipeline to the people of the NWT, but they can only do so much.

Mr. Speaker, I am not here to criticize or point fingers, but we have too many people with their own agendas who are going to jeopardize the project. Mr. Speaker, we have a representative in Ottawa elected by the people of the NWT. Why aren’t they fighting for the settlement of the claim so this project can move forward? We need the federal government to do what is best for the residents of the NWT. I want to see this project go ahead. I want to see the youth benefiting from all of the opportunities that will be there. I want to see the NWT get their fair share of the revenues.

Mr. Speaker, for the sake of all the young people across the North, let us not waste any more valuable time. We can’t afford to wait another 20 years. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

ITEM 6: RECOGNITION OF VISITORS IN THE GALLERY

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. With the indulgence of my colleagues here, I want to recognize at least half of the visitors in the gallery here. Mr. Delorey is going to recognize the other half. I know it is a large group, but thank you. Their parents are going to watch this tonight on APTN, so when I call your name, jump up quick so the camera can scan you because we have a lot of names to get here.

The parent volunteers who are here today with us are: Lori Lafferty, Kandace Jameson, Beth Green, Shannon Buckley, Dawna O’Brien, Dale Hoose, Brenda Hall, Max Rodway, Leslie Lobb, Gayle Croucher, Barb Aitken, Steve Anderson, and Jean Hachey. I will introduce Mr. Walker’s class: Fraser Anderson, Heather Atkins, Michelle Babiuk, Blake Banfield, Amanda Beaulieu, Jacquelyn Buckley, Edward Crane, Alana Croucher, Scotty Heron, Lise Larocque, Jesse McCordic, Desiree Parker, Elaine Roach, Gwen Ruttle, Tory Sabourin, and Jordan Smith. Welcome to the Legislative Assembly.

---Applause

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

We also have Grade 6 teachers and assistants from PA school: Karen Wall, Chris Walker, Bob White, Pauline Morrison, and Joannie Lafferty. In Ms. Wall’s class: Sean Aitken, Kirk Alcos, Hilary Aldridge, Melinda Arcand, Adrian Beaulieu, Arthur Cameron, Erin Campbell, Kaitlin Cayen, Sasha Cayen, Brittany Dumas, Kelsey Kimble, Kyle Mabbitt, Jasmine Marshall, Morgan Penney, Olivia Sperry, Ben Squirrel, Dannelle Stalmack, Ursula Unka; and Mr. White’s class: Justin Boutilier, Richelle Daniels, Shane Duncan, Lauren Gilbert, Sean Gilbert, Lucas Hachey, Trudy Hiebert, Brett Jameson, Brittnee Lafferty, Justin Lafferty, Adam Lakusta, and Darryl Larocque.

Also, we have some parents and volunteers: Joseph Lirette, Hailey Lyon, Sherman Magtiby, Angel Martel, J.J. McKinney, Mikaela Muller, Frankie Ranger, and Johnny Ryan Zoe. Welcome to the Legislative Assembly. I hope you’ve had a very enjoyable and informative tour. I hope you enjoy the rest of your tour and have safe trips home.

---Applause

Item 6, recognition of visitors in the gallery. The honourable Member for Kam Lake, Mr. Ramsay.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a few people I’d like to recognize; first is Richard Edjericon. Richard is a former chief of the Yellowknives Dene and candidate-elect for the Conservative Party in the Western Arctic riding. Welcome, Richard.

---Applause

With Richard is Mr. Gerry Cheezie. Gerry is the manager of the Yellowknives Dene housing. Welcome, Gerry.

---Applause

Also, Mr. Speaker, I’d like to recognize Ms. Amanda Mallon who is the president of the Northwest Territories Teachers’ Association. Welcome.

---Applause

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Item 6, recognition of visitors in the gallery. The honourable Member for Weledeh, Mr. Handley.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It gives me a great deal of pleasure to recognize my constituent, Major Karen Hoeft, as we all know a very passionate advocate for the homeless, the poor and I think generally all people that have personal challenges in their lives. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. Handley. Item 6, recognition of visitors in the gallery. The honourable Member for Great Slave, Mr. Braden.

Mr. Speaker, I, too, would like to welcome all the youngsters and their parents and teachers from Hay River and hope that Yellowknife’s hospitality stands up to the test. Like my colleague from Kam Lake, I’d like to recognize the president of the NWT Teachers’ Association, Amanda Mallon. Welcome.

---Applause