Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I said, every time I hear from Members in the House, I do ensure that information is conveyed to the RCMP, and the leadership in those communities have direct relationships with the RCMP as well so I'm sure they're also conveying that information. So, you know, between all of us, I'm sure the message will get out there. Thank you.
Thank you, Minister. Oral questions. Member for Nunakput.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions today are for the Minister of Transportation in regards to the Dempster Highway from the corner to the NWT border. Is the Minister working with the Yukon government and the federal Minister to see if we could get any funding jointly to get the highway fixed because the wear and tear on everybody's vehicles is like, from the Delta, Mr. Speaker, is there any possible way to make agreement, I guess, with the federal Minister to get monies for that road? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Member for Nunakput. Minister responsible for Infrastructure.
Quyananni. Yes, the Department of Infrastructure is working with the Yukon counterparts. I just want to note, Mr. Speaker, that the Premier Pillai was up in Inuvik for the northern Premiers meeting and, you know, we had discussions on putting a joint submission forward to Canada because the Member is correct, you know, I get a number of concerns that the Dempster Highway is doing a lot of wear and tear. I mean, you know, we as the GNWT has done work from Inuvik's side. You know, we're not done yet but, I mean, we're working towards the border, Mr. Speaker. You're fully aware of the conditions once you pass the border going into the Yukon. You know, we as the northern residents up in the Beaufort Delta, we use the Dempster Highway all the time for our supplies. So, I mean, yes, we are working with the Yukon government. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know when I hit the NWT side, that's a real highway right to Tsiigehtchic. That highway's really well maintained, and well done to the department. But, you know, soon as you hit the NWT border southbound, right to the corner, you're pounding out shocks, and the wear and tear on not only the regular community trucks but to all the trucking companies too because the upkeep on that highway's so bad.
But, Mr. Speaker, the question I have right now is when will the Minister be doing that joint submission with the Yukon, and is there a timeline on that to get it submitted to the federal government? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, you know, I just I want to note that at the meeting, you know, we sat at the table. Premier Cochrane was there as well, grand chief for the Gwich'in Tribal Council was also at the table. We had really indepth discussions. It's also a priority. And the grand chief had also mirrored some of my concerns as well. So, I mean, we are working together from the region to be able to further discuss. You know, it is important because it's a vital link standpoint for resupply but, you know, tourism opportunities as well that benefit both jurisdictions in the Yukon and the Northwest Territories. Arctic sovereignty, for example, is most importantly. Road safety for both territories. Mr. Speaker, we are working with the government. Premier Pillai had promised me that he would look into perhaps putting some money into the Yukon side. So I'm looking forward to furthering that discussion with him. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Yeah, thank you for that, Mr. Speaker. Thank you to the Minister for that. But when would we be able to get that joint submission in to get the monies to get that highway done, just the timeline? Is it this summer that they're going to do a joint submission, or is the Minister going to go to Whitehorse to get that done? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the I just want to note, you know, yes we're pushing from the GNWT standpoint but realistically this has to be Yukon led. I mean, this is their part of the highway. We can't be submitting federal funding for another jurisdiction other than let's do this together. And, you know, in terms of timeline, I'm hoping by the summer. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Okay, thank you, Mr. Speaker. No, I'm really happy to hear that the works going to be done by my Minister. And hopefully she could get into the Yukon into Whitehorse to go and meet with the appropriate Minister and to get this joint submission done and make them think it's their idea when it's actually ours. So I'm encouraging the Minister to get down to Whitehorse as soon as possible to get this done because it's just a little bit too much wear and tear on everybody's vehicles. And like I always said, you know, as the Beaufort Delta has more we do more of our shopping and everything like that in the Yukon so that road's really well in need of upkeep and care. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, that's that's my you know, that's something I want to do. I've been having discussions with the Premier. And, you know, I continue to work with the Premier's office to be able to have a road trip from Dawson all the way to Inuvik and hit every pothole there is on that road. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Minister. Oral questions. Member for Thebacha.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I just want to for the record, to talk about the housing stability worker for Fort Smith and the South Slave. And I want to ask the Minister about this because I think the person has to have certain criteria. The criteria should be a person without judgement, a neutral person, a person who can navigate underprivileged clients in getting through the system for housing, and therefore it should not be it should not be a person who is part of the Housing NWT office in Hay River. It should have a separate office. And that's the way that's the only way we would solve the problems. I wonder if the Minister would agree with me on that? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Member for Thebacha. Minister responsible for Housing NWT.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Premier had just tabled a document in regards to homelessness as well too, and this is one of the actions through this strategy as well too. But looking at how we would be looking at a housing stability worker, that is a conversation that we are having throughout the territory as well. And I do agree with the Member that having this position not housed within housing and looking at further opportunities is what I would like to see. I like the innovative approach, and I would like to see the communities take more of a stronger partnership with us when we're addressing housing in the communities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, you know, strong leadership with such a need within the whole Northwest Territories for the underprivileged that do not have housing is a mandate of ours, and I want to make sure that the person that is allocated to these positions are completely neutral and without judgement and navigate the system. Strong leadership within leadership with elected officials is extremely important and must give direction. And I want to know if the Minister agrees with me? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And, yes, I do agree with the Member with this approach as well. We've tried this in the Tlicho and looking at our successes and doing business differently and addressing housing differently as well. We've initiated this through the distinctionbased funding and working with Indigenous governments. We've also done this with our community housing plans and identifying significant drastic needs at the community level, and I feel that this approach is where we need to start strategizing and start thinking. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Only when we do these kind of changes will I regain my confidence in Housing NWT, because I feel that the underprivileged and some of the situations that I tried to navigate through in the last four years have not been dealt with, and I feel that change is with oversight, neutrality, no judgement, and making sure that the underprivileged are looked after. Would the Minister agree with me? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And yes, I do agree with the Member. I think we should have this approach throughout the Northwest Territories. And within the four years, I know that it's been quite challenging for this government and for the communities to see a lot of progress within this portfolio, but we do have the renewal that has been brought forward as well too, and we do have the policy changes, the energy strategy has been brought forward. And with that approach, I'm looking to seeing housing approach and do things differently and recognizing work with the communities a lot more closely, and I would like to see decisions made at the local level and bringing those up to our table and right here into the Assembly for our discussion so we can make sure that we do work productively with our communities and within this government. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think that this navigator housing navigator with a neutral approach would be the answer to some of the issues that many of us have been bringing forward. Especially myself, I felt that I didn't get this is the one file that I feel that many times that I failed on. As a very strong I feel like a strong MLA who navigates for people who have not been treated fairly within the system. And I still feel that way. And with the new policy that has come out for homelessness and all that, I hope that changes, and I look forward to change. And I think it should be a priority for us before we finish this session, this next session in August. Thank you. Would the Minister agree with me on that? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And yes, I do agree with the Member, absolutely. And when I had this portfolio, I wanted to see significant changes. I do come from a smaller community. And I do come home, and I see these struggles right at the ground level, right from homelessness to outdated mortgages to mold in houses. And, you know, do we have the budget to address each and every one of these issues? This government and this portfolio has a hundred-unit rollout. And I know it doesn't seem as significant, but we Mr. Speaker, we haven't had a replenishment of units in the last four decades. And with the collaboration with the Indigenous governments, I brought forward the messaging from housing is that, you know, if you're not going to if the federal government is not going to fund the territorial government, then fund the Indigenous governments directly, recognize those federal agreements, recognize those negotiations that are going on. And with that, successfully we were able to see approximately $650,000 coming to the Northwest Territories but directly going to the Indigenous governments, and we work with them side by side, Mr. Speaker. But one thing I don't agree with is the Member did not fail with the approach and working with us. She has brought this portfolio to a different level where we are thinking differently. A lot of her advocacy has contributed to the policy changes, and I appreciate all of those comments coming forward. Thank you so much. Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Minister. Oral questions. Member for Hay River South.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I was kind of worried there that I might not have time, but.
Mr. Speaker, from the start of this 19th Assembly, I have talked about dredging. People want to call it harbour remediation, they want to call it harbour restoration, whatever. But really it is removing the silt from the bottom of the channel in the harbour so that boats can come in and out. It's not just me that has talked about it. You know, the Member for Hay River North, when he was sitting on this side, he did the same thing. And, you know, Mr. Bouchard, when he was here, he did the same thing. But we haven't seen any of the infrastructure Ministers do anything in the last how many years with this. We haven't seen any dredging. People in Hay River have been asking for it. And I'm hoping that this Minister, you know, will be different. You know, we're giving her a chance to do something, like I said before, that the other ones haven't been able to do. So we are getting like, we are all aware that, you know, we are getting close to the shipping season here. We're getting close to, you know, the commercial fisheries. The other day I was at a meeting and the fishermen were concerned. You know, there's less than four feet of water in the channel so when the fishing boats and MTS barges are loaded, they need a little bit more than that. So I guess what I'd like to know, I guess, is, you know, after years of no dredging, can the Minister confirm if this summer will be different? Are we going to be dragging boats through the channel? Are we going to be having you know, making a few dollars for MTS by pulling coast guard boats off? I don't know. But I think that, you know, we don't want to be spending more money not getting freight up to the communities because they can't get through the channel at Hay River. So, again, will the Minister confirm if there will be anything going on this summer, and we need it done now. We don't need it done later in the summer. We need some type of action sooner than later. Thank you.
Thank you, Member for Hay River South. Minister responsible for Infrastructure.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, and I you know, I recognize the Member's concerns. You know, I've been to Hay River several times to have a community meeting and, you know, it is important to the Member's constituents that, you know, there's great concern that, you know, we're not getting our tugs out of Hay River on time and, you know, it reflects a lot of our disruption up the valley. So, you know, I think the Member's going to be really happy right now because we are getting this started. And I appreciate that, you know, we have talked about this and talked about this but, you know, we really seen you know, last year where we just had struggles getting our supplies into Sachs Harbour. That is still the point that we're at.
So Mr. Speaker, I want to let the Member know that we are just finalizing an RFP for the initial phrase of the dredging. We want to call it harbour restoration, and it will be posted in the next couple days, Mr. Speaker; either today or Monday. And I will give a head's up notice to both the Members from Hay River on where we're at with the RFP process.
But I also want to take this opportunity, Mr. Speaker, to thank the Members for their patience as we worked through a number of things, such as the engineering permitting process to get the first phase underway, which will concentrate on the channel. And the fisheries, so that they can have access to the harbour, Mr. Speaker. I would be remiss if I didn't thank the federal government on their assistance in funding this phase of the harbour restoration.
Mr. Speaker, we need our tugs out there in order to keep schedule this year. We need them. It's, you know, very important to some of the Members. It's important to this government as well as the communities to get supplies and fuel up the valley. We've spent a lot of money in the last year from this government, and we can't afford to do that anymore. So I just want to thank the Member for the question. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. That was pretty well the only question I had. And I'd like to thank the Minister for the work that the department has done to make this happen. Like I say, you know, in the last probably 20 years we haven't seen anything happen with the channel, and I think people in Hay River will be pleased to hear, you know, the efforts that the department and this government has made to make this happen this year. So more of a comment than anything. Thank you.
Thank you, Member for Hay River South. Taken as a comment. Colleagues, our time for oral questions has expired. Member for Kam Lake.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, it's Friday so I figured I'd seek unanimous consent to return to oral questions, number 7 on the orders of the day. Thank you.
Thank you, Member for Kam Lake. The Member is seeking unanimous consent to return to item 7. Are there any nays?
Unanimous consent denied
Yeah, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Written questions I have is a document for unresolved matters of the federal Indian Day School. I'd like to table this document or sorry written question, I'd like to put this on the record. Thank you. I thought we were done. Okay, thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Unresolved matters of the federal Indian Day School. My questions are to the Premier regarding the unresolved matter of the federal Indian Day School:
On April 1, 1969, the Roman Catholic Church and Anglican Church relinquished control of the federal Indian Day Schools and transferred the programs to the Northwest Territories. There were 29 federal Indian Day Schools in the NWT where Indigenous children and youth were subjected to physical, emotional, sexual abuse, and cultural genocide. Can the Premier provide in detail the steps the Government of the Northwest Territories has taken to formally acknowledge and document these abuses;
Survivors want an opportunity to share their experiences and stories and preserve these for historical records. Can the Premier describe in detail what the GNWT has done to set up a commission to listen to these experiences and stories and establish an archive for ongoing learning and research similar to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada;
The Prime Minister of Canada and the Pope formally apologized to residential school survivors and acknowledges the intergenerational damages caused by residential schools. What is the rationale for the Premier not apologizing for the GNWT's role in its abuses and cultural genocide of Indigenous children and youth with federal Indian Day Schools; and,
What position would the GNWT take on a class action lawsuit brought forward by survivors of the federal Indian Day Schools?
Mr. Speaker, I'd like to put this on the record. Mahsi.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Your Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment is pleased to provide a Report on Supporting Northern Businesses and commends it to the House, Mr. Speaker.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment made it a priority early in the life of the 19th Legislative Assembly to increase the northern responsiveness by government policies and services in an effort to stimulate diversity among northern businesses, particularly Indigenous businesses. To achieve this goal, committee reviewed Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) policies, programs, and legislation related to business development. Committee also conducted internal research and engaged with stakeholders and the public at large. Several Members of the 19th Assembly raised concerns with support for the private sector especially in response to the COVID19 pandemic. The committee has considered all this information and used it to inform a range of recommendations to the GNWT with the intent and purpose of building and diversifying the NWT economy and improving business support services and programs.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT increase transparency to all capital projects and especially public threeyear capital plans of projects of small communities and regional centres so businesses can plan.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT track and limit sole source contracts by creating a target to ensure:
No more than 15 percent of all contracts over $25,000 are issued to sole source contracts;
Regular public reports and achievement target be provided within six months of the end of each fiscal year; and,
That these public reports outline sole source contracts given to nonNWT businesses as well as the departments using sole source methods most often.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that contractual provisions limit change orders to no more than 15 percent of the original cost of the project and that be a regular review of change orders requiring ministerial oversight and no change orders greater than $10,000.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends to improve public reporting actual benefits achieved under negotiated contracts to better track the impact of this spending; and, further recommends that the GNWT's public reports on this spending indicate the local accommodations used and the number of jobs created.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT review the U.S. Small Business Administration 8(a) Program, which currently serves Indigenous businesses, such as those owned by the Alaska native corporations and native Hawaiian organizations with the purpose of developing similar programs like this in the NWT.
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT create and implement an Indigenous Procurement Policy that addresses economic gaps in the NWT by giving preference to Indigenous businesses.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Member for Nunakput. Member for Nunakput.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I move, second by the honourable Member from Deh Cho, that the Committee Report 5319(2), Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment Report on Supporting Northern Businesses deemed read and printed in Hansard.
Member for Nunakput, we'll have to make a short correction here.
I'll start over again. I move, second by the honourable Member from Frame Lake, that the Committee Report 5319(2), Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment Report on Supporting Northern businesses be deemed read and printed in Hansard in its entirety. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Member for Nunakput. The motion is in order. To the motion?
Question.
Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? Any abstentions? The motion is carried. The report will be deemed read and printed in Hansard.
Executive Summary
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment (Committee) made it a priority early in the life of the 19th Legislative Assembly to increase the responsiveness of government policies and services in an effort to stimulate diversity among northern businesses, and particularly Indigenous businesses. To achieve this goal, Committee reviewed Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) policies, programs, and legislation related to business development. Committee also conducted internal research and engaged with stakeholders and the public at large. Several Members of the 19th Assembly raised concerns with support for the private sector especially in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Committee has considered all this information and used it to inform a range of recommendations to the GNWT with the intent and purpose of building and diversifying the NWT economy and improving business support services and programs.
Recommendation 1: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT increase transparency for all capital projects and especially provide public Three-Year Capital Plans for projects in small communities and regional centres, so businesses can plan.
Recommendation 2: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT track and limit sole source contracts by creating a target to ensure:
no more than 15% of all contracts over $25,000 are issued as sole source contracts,
regular public reports on the achievement of this target be provided within six months of the end of each fiscal year,
and that these public reports outline sole source contracts given to non-NWT businesses as well as the Departments using sole source methods most often.
Recommendation 3: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that contractual provisions limit change orders to no more than 15% of the original project cost and that there be a regular review of change orders requiring Ministerial oversight for change orders greater than $10,000.
Recommendation 4: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT improve the public reporting of actual benefits achieved under Negotiated Contracts to better track the impact of this spending, and further recommends that the GNWT’s public reports on this spending indicate the local accommodations used and the number of jobs created.
Recommendation 5: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT review the U.S. Small Business Administration 8(a) program, which currently serves Indigenous businesses, such as those owned by the Alaska Native corporations and Native Hawaiian organizations, with the purpose of developing similar programs in the NWT.
Recommendation 6: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT create and implement an Indigenous Procurement Policy that addresses economic gaps in the NWT by giving preference to Indigenous businesses.
Introduction
The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment (Committee) made it a priority early in the life of the 19th Legislative Assembly to increase the responsiveness of government policies and services in order to stimulate diversity among northern businesses and in particular Indigenous businesses.
To achieve this goal, Committee reviewed Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) policies, programs, and legislation related to business development. Committee also conducted internal research and engaged with stakeholders and the public at large. Several Members of the 19th Assembly raised concerns with support for the private sector most especially in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Committee has considered all this information and used it to inform a range of recommendations to the GNWT.
Why Does It Matter
A mandate item of the GNWT in the 19th Legislative Assembly is to implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Committee recognizes this commitment and believes the recommendations provided in this report support the GNWT towards the implementation of UNDRIP.
To advance reconciliation, the implementation of the recommendations below should follow the priorities set out in the Articles. According to the UNDRIP, Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination and to freely pursue economic development in all their traditional and other economic activities (Articles 3, 5 and 20). The GNWT must take effective measures to ensure continuing improvement of economic conditions and Indigenous peoples have a right to be actively involved in administering economic programs affecting them (Article 21 and 23). They must also consult and cooperate in good faith when making decisions that impact Indigenous resources.
Several UNDRIP Articles address Indigenous people’s right to lands and natural resources.
Article 32(2)
“States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilization or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources.”
Engagement Process
Committee invited submissions or presentations from all Indigenous governments. Committee also solicited presentations from Indigenous economic development corporations and businesses across all regions of the Northwest Territories. Committee advertised its requests for public submissions and public presentations were live streamed. The following stakeholders presented to Committee. Recordings can be viewed in full on the NT Legislative Assembly YouTube channel, and are included in the Appendix to this report:
Denendeh Investments
Yukon First Nation Chamber of Commerce (Yukon Indigenous Procurement Policy)
Gwich’in Tribal Council
Tłı̨chǫ Investment Corporation
Yellowknife Chamber of Commerce
NWT Métis Nation
Det’on Cho Corporation
NWT Indigenous Leaders Economic Coalition
Yellowknife Chamber of Commerce
Several internal briefings were held with the Minister of Industry, Tourism and Investment regarding the Procurement Review, mining, and the Mining Royalty Review, supports for businesses during the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Knowledge Economy Action Plan, Regional Economic Development Plans as well as the Business Development Investment Corporation.
Internal briefings were also held with the Minister of Infrastructure regarding major infrastructure projects and support for regional economic development through GNWT infrastructure projects.
Recommendations to Government
Based on this engagement, Committee provides several recommendations to the GNWT around the following themes:
Building the NWT economy,
Building a diversified economy, and
Improving business support services and programs.
Building The NWT Economy
The GNWT is a significant player in the NWT economy. The Bureau of Statistics reports in 2021, the GNWT created $458.2 million dollars of value-added goods and services in the NWT economy. This represents 11% of the NWT’s total GDP overall. The Bureau of Statistics also shows public administration was one of the fastest growing sectors in the NWT economy after Mining, Oil and Gas activities.
The impact of GNWT spending in the NWT economy, however, is significantly more than just the GNWTs impact on the territory’s GDP. The GNWT’s 2023-24 budget proposes spending $2.206 billion dollars. The 2023-24 Main Estimate budget shows the GNWT plans to spend over $1 billion dollars on grants, contributions, and transfers; $432 million is to be spent on compensation and benefits; $307 million on contract services and $126 million on fees and payments.
Procurement
Early in its review of business supports, Committee recognized that GNWT procurement is a significant contributor to the economic health of the NWT overall, especially in the regional centres and small communities. Procurement was both a focal point for SCEDE discussions and a concern for many regular Members of the 19th Assembly. The topic of ‘procurement’ was discussed over 500 times in the 19th Assembly, far surpassing other Assembly discussions on this topic. Members advocated for a variety of changes related to improving administration, payment timelines, targeting procurement in small communities, etc.
A 2019-2023 Mandate of the GNWT is to “ensure government procurement and contracting maximizes benefits to residents and businesses.” The GNWT has set out to achieve this by:
strengthening procurement policies and practices
increase awareness of GNWT contracting opportunities, and
improve NWT companies’ participation in Business Incentive Policy (BIP)
Committee heard from stakeholders on this topic and received a variety of suggestions on how to improve procurement in the GNWT related to:
planning and strategic administration of procurement
improving payment timelines
expanding the use of negotiated contracts
improving vendor performance management
increasing Indigenous business
targeting procurement in small communities
strategic procurement to build local business, especially indigenous businesses and businesses in remote communities
On November 4, 2021, the GNWT tabled a Report of the Procurement Review Panel. An independent panel reviewed GNWT procurement and issued over 50 recommendations. The GNWT responded to this panel’s report, releasing an operational workplan on the Procurement Review September 2022.
On March 27, 2023, the Minister acknowledged this response was a summary of the work underway, but that the Government would be providing a more comprehensive response to the Panel’s 50 recommendations later this summer.
While Committee supports the work of the GNWT to review procurement policies with independent experts, the public, and Indigenous governments, Committee believes more urgency is needed to affect meaningful change within the NWT’s private sector and economic health overall.
Committee recognizes that the NWT economy is resource dependent and the current lifespan of diamond mining in the NWT is finite. And while efforts are underway to extend the life of diamond mines, expand critical mineral resource development, and diversify the economy, Committee also recognizes that none of these initiatives, at this point, will replace the economic value that diamond mining brings to the NWT. Other factors impact this sector of the economy as well:
Decades high inflation rates are impacting diamond mines operating costs, as well as labour, fuel, electricity, and equipment costs.
Diavik diamond mine is expected to end production in the first quarter of 2026.
Ekati (Arctic Canadian Diamond Company) may cease conventional mining in 2028.
Gahcho Kue (Mountain Province) has made positive steps in refinancing to reduce debt which “places the company in a position to pursue exciting growth opportunities in the Hearne discovery and Kennady North project”.
With mines potentially closing, the GNWT is the largest employer in the territory; public administration is the fastest growing sector. This speaks to the urgency behind Committee’s efforts to improve GNWT procurement, and therefore how the GNWT spends its money can significantly alter the health of the NWT economy.
Committee held a public hearing with the independent panel to discuss the findings and recommendations. The themes of recommendations from this Panel are listed below:
Establish a strategic approach to procurement
Increase procurement opportunities and impact
Make it easier to do business with the GNWT
Create greater capacity to support procurement.
Committee agrees with the recommendations of the panel. Committee also acknowledges that the GNWT has made progress on procurement and that the GNWT has had to respond to a global pandemic in which several new GNWT programs were rolled out. However, Committee felt the GNWT’s urgency to re-shape programs to respond to COVID-19 is the same urgency needed today to ensure the economic health of the NWT in the future.
Strategic Procurement
Committee agrees with the independent panel that more planning and communication around government procurement could maximize benefits for northern businesses.
The independent panel recommended that procurement should be treated like a ‘program’ requiring things like objectives, targets, measurables, etc. By treating procurement as a program, the GNWT would ensure more supports to each stage of the procurement process such as:
identifying and planning for the contract,
advertising, communicating and outreach of the contract,
awarding the contract,
monitoring the project, and
evaluating value for money spent.
Improved communications and advance planning
In the NWT, while there are a few highly developed companies and corporations, much of the private sector is still developing. Committee remains concerned that a large portion of GNWT procurement is benefitting southern companies; and that within the NWT the smaller, more remote, or emerging businesses are unable to compete with established businesses.
Stakeholders expressed concern about procurement processes and viewed inclusion in procurement processes as part of reconciliation.
There was concern that businesses miss opportunities by not being aware of what projects are being advanced. For businesses in regional centres and more remote communities, advance notice is necessary to provide time for adequate preparation.
Committee analyzed the distribution of BIP’d businesses, GNWT grants, and contributions, by region and community. It is clear that capital and regional centres are driving business in the NWT.
The NWT economy is weakest in the remote communities.
Committee agreed that to support businesses locally, increased communications is key. But for businesses in regional centres and small communities, this advance notice and communication is essential to allow for fair competition.
Without advance notice and preparation time to secure partners or make business relationships, businesses in small communities will always be significantly disadvantaged.
Committee agreed that the GNWT should be able to increase transparency with the private sector regarding both upcoming capital projects and procurement plans that will be delivered in small communities. Increasing local communications where a project is planned allows for local industry to respond and prepare for the work. For example, the Government of Yukon publishes a public Five-Year Capital Plan to provide a transparent view into the government’s priorities. This report reviews how the government has delivered on its commitments, provides project budget updates, and discusses on-going capital projects. A model like this could serve the need to keep communities informed.
The Procurement Review Panel noted increased communications as an interim step to implementing an Indigenous Procurement Policy. This matter also relates to the implementation of economic measures under the Land and Resource Self Government Agreements which are discussed further below.
Recommendation 1: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT increase transparency for all capital projects and especially provide public Three-Year Capital Plans for projects in small communities and regional centres, so businesses can plan.
Contract Services
Contract Services was a particular focus of Committee. How the GNWT administers contract services can directly impact the development and prosperity of the NWT business sector.
When looking at the value of business to BIP registered companies it varies between 75% to 25% of total GNWT contracts
Apart from 2019/20, the value of business with BIP registered companies has been growing. From $168 million in 2018/19 to $279 million in 2021/22. The value of contracts provided to NWT businesses over this time has increased from $187 million (18/19) to $334 million (21/22).
In 2019/2020, the GNWT awarded the highest value of contracts to non-NWT businesses valued at $510 million overall (75%). While non-NWT businesses did receive substantial support in 2019/20, the GNWT procured 93% of contracts through the competitive process in 19/20
Of the competitive contracts issued in 2019/20, $478 million was provided to non-NWT businesses. Of those non-NWT businesses, contracts of highest value were procured for construction and fuel services.
Members of the 19th Assembly voiced concerns about the value of contract services being administered by the GNWT, and that contract services were being over-used by GNWT staff, while simultaneously the size of the public sector itself was growing. Members negotiated with the GNWT through the budget planning process to reduce contract services across all Departments.
Committee wanted to see changes in the administration of Contract Services to ensure that NWT-based businesses were not losing business opportunities to southern companies.
Origination of Sole Source Contracts
Committee has been particularly focused on the use of sole source contracts in GNWT procurement. The sole source contracting process should occur when only one firm is available and capable of performing a contract, or the urgency of the situation determines that the competitive process cannot be used. An analysis of GNWT Contract Reports revealed that while negotiated contracts resemble sole source contracts, they are fundamentally different (this is discussed in more detail below), and the value of sole source contracts has grown over the life of the assembly while the total value of contracts has decreased overall.
Sole source contracts have risen from $45 million (19/20) to $83 million (21/22). However, the value of sole source contracts is still below 2018/19 at $137 million. Total GNWT contracts have decreased over the same period from $679 million (19/20) to $444 million (21/22). Sole source contracts as a percentage of total GNWT contracts grew from 6.7% (19/20) to 18.8% (21/22).
The value of competitively obtained contracts peaked in 2019/20 at $628 million. If you look at the trend from 2018/19 ($192 million) to 2021/22 ($291 million) competitive contracts are increasing, while the same period shows a decrease in overall contracts from $628 million (2019/20) to $291 million (2021/22). Year to year there does not appear to be consistency in the percentage of sole source contracts administered by the GNWT overall.
During the same period, the use of sole source contracts increased while the use of competitively obtained contracts decreased. However, setting aside the surge in competitive contracts in 2019/20, the value of competitively obtained contracts still increased over time from $192 million (2018/19) to $291 million (2021/22).
Of the $45 million in sole source contracts the GNWT provided in 2019/20, $32 million went to non-NWT businesses. Looking specifically at these sole source contracts to non-NWT businesses, the Department of Infrastructure and Finance were the largest administrators at $15 million and $10 million respectively. Health and Social Services was the next highest at $2.5 million. Of these, contracts administered over 1 million were related to: computer software licencing and programming, barge design, legacy building design.
Committee recognizes that sole source contracts are a necessary form of procurement for the GNWT to conduct business, especially as it relates to contracts under $25,000; however, Committee is concerned about the potential for the GNWT to use this form of procurement over competitive tenders to the detriment of NWT-based businesses.
Policy on Sole Source Limits
The GNWT’s financial administration manual and interpretive bulletins explain the process and guidelines to procure goods and services. For goods and services under $25,000 Departments can go direct to suppliers.
On April 1, 2021, media reports stated that the GNWT reduced the sole source contract limit for general goods and services from $25,000 to $10,000 on a short-term basis. The reason cited for this change was to prevent people from “gaming the system.” However, the current rules allow sole source contracts for goods and services up to $25,000.
Under the Financial Administration Manual Policy, in order for the GNWT to procure a sole source contract over $25,000 the following criteria would need to be met:
contract is urgently required, and delay would be injurious
only one party available and capable of performing the contract
professional services between 25,000 – 50,000
architectural or engineering services between 25,000 – 100,000
only one manufacturer or an Approved NWT Manufactured Product
Committee recognizes the GNWT has had to weather a global pandemic, unprecedented flooding, wildfires, and public health restrictions over the life of the assembly, but Committee notes continued concerns about the rationale for using sole source contracts over $25,000.
The government has stated publicly the use of sole source contracts is largely related to urgency. Committee questions the use of urgency.
Committee also has concerns about the procurement of sole source contracts to non-NWT businesses. When looking at the value of sole source contracts provided to non-NWT businesses it varies between 42% – 80% of total sole source contracts administered by the GNWT between 2018/19 – 2021/22.
Although 80% of sole source contracts were provided to non-NWT business in 2018/19, that year Imperial Oil was provided $56 million for barge re-supply, which is over half of the total amount of sole source contracts provided to non-NWT businesses. Excluding the Imperial Oil contract for barge re-supply, non-NWT businesses still accounts for 40% of all sole source contracts. Apart from $110 million administered to non-NWT business in 2018/19, over the life of the 19th assembly contracts to non-NWT business has ranged between $27 million to $38 million.
The percentage of sole source contracts to non-NWT businesses (42%-80%) is slightly higher than the ratio of non-NWT businesses receiving GNWT contracts overall (25%-75%). Committee is concerned that it may be easier for the GNWT to conduct business with non-NWT companies when administering sole source contracts as opposed to through the competitive process.
Committee also notes there is no reporting mechanism to track which criteria are applied to administer a sole source contract over $25,000.
Recommendation 2: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT track and limit sole source contracts by creating a target to ensure:
no more than 15% of all contracts over $25,000 are issued as sole source contracts,
regular public reports on the achievement of this target be provided within six months of the end of each fiscal year,
and that these public reports outline sole source contracts given to non-NWT businesses as well as the Departments using sole source methods most often.
Change Orders
Committee noted concerns about the use of change orders as a tool for contractors to obtain a bid, and then adjust the value of the total contract throughout the duration of the project.
When looking at the use of change orders over time, one correlation appears to be consistent: as the total value of GNWT contracts increases, the value of change orders also increases.
The percentage of the total GNWT contracts adjusted from change orders varied between 9.3% – 14.7% from 2018/19 to 2021/22 (see Table 4: Sole Source Contract Change Orders). The use of change orders on GNWT contracts has remained just below the typical percentage applied for contingency planning (15%), and sole source contracts also represent on average 17% of the total change orders.
To ensure the use of change orders does not become a tool to manipulate project overruns and total project costs, Committee suggests placing a limit on the percentage of total change that will be approved on change orders for across all projects.
Such a limit on change orders would be consistent with practices in other jurisdictions. For example, the British Columbia Construction Association (BCCA) agreed to a provision determining contractor markup on change orders by percentage: “to the cost of the work performed by the contractor directly, the contractor may add a maximum of 20% markup for overhead and profit combined” with a provision for a maximum of 10% for subcontractors. For change orders in Alberta, contractors can receive 15% for actual direct costs related to changes in work for overhead costs and profit, and subcontractors are entitled to the same, provided the province and contractors agree to the written change order.
Limiting change orders can help prevent low-bid contracts. Auditing of the GNWT’s change order policy, and Ministerial oversight for change orders greater than $10,000, will also ensure transparency and public accountability.
Recommendation 3: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that contractual provisions limit change orders to no more than 15% of the original project cost and that there be a regular review of change orders requiring Ministerial oversight for change orders greater than $10,000.
Business Incentive Policy
Committee acknowledges the intent behind the Business Incentive Policy and believes it is a tool that should be leveraged to build the NWT economy by increasing business with BIP’d companies.
Committee wants to see the policies of the GNWT result in increased business development and value of business captured by NWT companies.
GTC states the BIP has had limited effectiveness in relation to success and development of Gwich’in businesses.
Aside from the surge in non-NWT business in 2019/20, Table 1 demonstrates over the years BIP registered businesses have grown slightly from 48% in 2018/19 to capture the majority of GNWT contracts at 63% in 2021/22,
As noted earlier, 2019/20 appears to be an odd year where non-NWT business contracts ($510 million) far exceeded NWT business contracts ($168 million).
When looking at a longer timeframe, however, the benefits to northern business are decreasing. The Procurement Review Panel notes that although the number of contracts received by BIP businesses averages 65% the value of contracts has been lower in the past five years compared to the previous four years.
“BIP registered businesses have received a fairly consistent share of the overall number of contracts (averaging 65% annually), they have been receiving a decreasing proportion of the total value of contract expenditures (averaging 39% of expenditures over the past five years, compared to 64% during the preceding four years).
Over the life of the 19th Assembly, the value of business done with BIP companies has risen slightly, an analysis of a longer timeframe shows business with BIP companies is down.
Committee is concerned with the application of the policy specifically as it relates to:
Grandfathered Companies under the Business Incentive Policy
International corporations, such as Walmart, that are grandfathered under the policy
Definition of the Northern Resident/Northern Business
Committee has heard from residents and businesses about concerns regarding the definition of “northern resident” and “northern businesses.” Committee wants to ensure that in the Business Incentive Policy review the GNWT.
Vendor Performance Management
The procurement panel identified that increasing vendor compliance with BIP commitments would increase NWT supplier confidence and interest in working with the GNWT.
BIP Evaluations
While BIP does award points for NWT and Local content, stakeholders felt this was still an area that could be improved, and that the BIP Policy may not fully recognize the higher cost of living, that local services are hard to obtain, as well as the added cost of managing a northern business.
All stakeholders identified the higher costs of doing business in the NWT as a challenge to business development. The purpose of BIP is to address the higher cost of business in the NWT, but Committee heard from stakeholders that the BIP policy is not effective with respect to contracts greater than $1 million.
The Procurement Review Panel notes that the current caps render BIP meaningless on contracts over $1 million, and this is something Members heard from their constituents as well. A review of the GNWT’s Contract Reports shows that the majority of contracts over $1 million are awarded to non-NWT businesses. Local businesses should be incentivized to take on contracts over $1 million so they can compete with non-NWT businesses.
Negotiated Contracts
Committee supports the use of the negotiated contracts policy and believes this procurement tool should support the development and expansion of Indigenous business and corporations.
Under the Negotiated Contracts Policy, “the GNWT may negotiate contracts outside the competitive contracting process when reasonably be expected to…. contribute to the creation, growth and competitive capacity of the NWT based businesses.” The GNWT makes annual reports available on contracts administered under the Negotiated Contracts Policy.
The annual reports provided under the Negotiated Contracts Policy do not provide enough information to determine whether GNWT contracts are effectively contributing to the creation, growth, and competitive capacity of NWT-based businesses. It is also unclear how the GNWT determines when a negotiated contact should be undertaken.
Committee has concerns about the GNWT being perceived as giving preference to certain contractors. When the GNWT has scheduled projects in small communities, increased engagement with each community may allow the GNWT to tailor negotiated contracts to meet the size and scale of community-based businesses. This may in turn develop the economy and improve business opportunities in regional centres and small communities in the NWT. For example, GTC noted that the Negotiated Contracts Policy needs to be updated as there is currently not enough focus on Aboriginal or Indigenous business.
Committee is concerned that there are no clear requirements or targets for how negotiated contracts will generate local spending or job creation results. The Review Panel for Procurement also notes the need for meaningful performance targets that would address this issue.
The outcomes of negotiated contracts should be more transparent. Every year the GNWT publishes a report that identifies anticipated benefits for each project, but there is no actual reporting on the actual benefits achieved by each project. Without this reporting, it is difficult to see how Negotiated Contracts are contributing to the “creation, growth and competitive capacity of NWT-based businesses.”
Committee remains concerned that projects have not come in on budget and on time.
Recommendation 4: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT improve the public reporting of actual benefits achieved under Negotiated Contracts to better track the impact of this spending, and further recommends that the GNWT’s public reports on this spending indicate the local accommodations used and the number of jobs created.
Committee sees an opportunity under Negotiated Contracts to provide wraparound supports for Indigenous businesses across the NWT so they can develop and expand. The GNWT could use the Negotiated Contracts policy as a tool to provide direct contracts to Indigenous businesses, while at the same time supporting the development and growth of these companies through a range of other business support services (such as loans, and business advice).
Committee believes there is great value in applying a similar procurement model as the US Small Business Administration (SBA).
Under this program qualifying “socially and economically disadvantaged businesses” can become certified under the 8(a) business development program. Once in the program, over the course of nine years, qualifying businesses are eligible for direct contracts from the government. The government not only sets aside contracts for eligible businesses, it targets 5% of all contracts to be placed with socially and economically disadvantaged businesses.
The SBA program over the course of nine years provides wraparound supports to businesses through loan programs, mentorship, advice, and direct contracts, including support to create joint ventures to obtain contracts. The result is that after nine years, these businesses have developed and expanded to a point where they no longer require the 8 (a) business development program to be competitive in the US economy.
The 8(a) Business Development program is intended to support Indigenous Business Development in the United States, particularly in Hawaii and Alaska, although the program uses the term “tribal economies,” noting that “when tribal economies flourish, the surrounding, non-tribal communities prosper as well.”
Other Canadian jurisdictions have developed similar approaches. The Social Procurement Brief for Alberta notes that by increasing participation from disadvantaged businesses owners, public institutions can improve economic and social outcomes for economically marginalized groups.
Recommendation 5: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends that the GNWT review the U.S. Small Business Administration 8(a) program which currently serves Indigenous businesses, such as those owned by the Alaska Native corporations and Native Hawaiian organizations, with the purpose of developing similar programs in the NWT.
Indigenous Business Development
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People affirms the right to self-determination and for Indigenous people to freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development. Land and Resource Self-Government Agreements set out provisions to achieve full participation of Indigenous people in the NWT economy with the overarching principle that Indigenous people in the NWT should be self-sufficient.
The economic measures as set out in the Gwich’in, Sahtu, and Tłı̨cho land claim agreements all provide stipulations around GNWT using preferential contracting policies in settlement areas, with approaches intended to maximize local, regional, and northern business opportunities and employment. When there is activity on settlement land, beneficiaries shall be given first opportunity to negotiate contracts, and the GNWT shall consult with communities when there is opportunity for financial, training, or economic activity within that community. Notifications for preferential contracting policies shall be provided.
Yet despite these provisions, a review of the Indigenous economic measurements in the NWT demonstrates that this vision is not being achieved.
In the NWT, Indigenous people make up over half (50.7%) of the population at 20,860 people, yet income, employment rates, and education levels rank significantly lower than in the non-indigenous population. According to the Indigenous Peoples 2016 Census, median income for NWT Indigenous people at $29,747, was considerably lower than the NWT non-Indigenous median of $71,400. Among the NWT Indigenous population, Metis people had a median income of $56,502 almost double that of the median Inuit income of $25,743.
Economic Measures of Land and Resource Self Government Agreements
Committee recognizes that business and economic development is an important tool to improve socio economic indicators across the NWT. When businesses and individuals normally excluded from economy are included, economic prosperity benefits everyone.
GTC suggests updating the Economic Measures MOU with a more tangible document to meet the needs of the Gwich’in and follow the spirit and intent of Chapter 10 in the GCLCA. Committee supports the GNWT to advance work to implement the economic measures.
Indigenous procurement policy
Committee has supported an Indigenous procurement policy that will address the economic gaps in the NWT. The number of Indigenous businesses and the value of the Indigenous economy is not tracked by the Bureau of Statistics. However, the Department of Industry, Tourism, and Investment tracks the number of BIP registered businesses.
Statistics Canada data indicates that Indigenous entrepreneurship is increasing relative to the rest of Canada. Yet, Indigenous people are still less likely than non-Indigenous people to be self-employed. The same study notes that there are 54,255 Indigenous Canadians who were self-employed at the time of the report, and 375 self-employed Indigenous people in the NWT, and of those self-employed Metis comprised 53.2%, followed by 41.1% First Nation, and 1.8% Inuit.
Until Indigenous people have equal access to economic opportunities, the full potential of the Indigenous economy will remain unknown.
Levelling the competition for Indigenous Business
There are many ways that Indigenous businesses can be provided a more equitable and fair opportunity to grow their business through government contracts.
Specific suggestions to improve government process were identified in the BC Indigenous Procurement Initiative, What We Heard Report. In this report five key themes were identified as necessary to implement an indigenous procurement initiative:
Valuing Indigenous culture and knowledge (culturally aware procurement staff)
Enhancing procurement processes to be more accessible to Indigenous business and communities (bid requirements, language, scale and scope)
Creating space in the procurement process for Indigenous businesses and communities (meaningful Indigenous participation and building effective partnerships and joint ventures)
Strengthening relationships, open communication and transparency (Indigenous capacity development, transparency in evaluation process, feedback on unsuccessful proposals)
Emphasizing local Indigenous procurement (notification process, consideration of indigenous knowledge, and communication).
The first step is that staff need to be culturally sensitive. Secondly, procurement staff need to design bids so that Indigenous businesses have the capacity to compete on them.
Committee also noted that increasing bid evaluation for majority-owned Indigenous businesses in the NWT, as well as those based in regional centres and small communities.
In addition to the tailoring the design of bids to match Indigenous businesses capacity, it is also identified that advance notice and communication be provided. This is necessary to allow Indigenous businesses the time to strategically organize their business to compete (through partnerships, joint ventures, etc.). This is also a point that stakeholders raised. More notice is required for upcoming construction projects, and better communication.
Stakeholders commented that Indigenous businesses need support to build ownership models to allow Indigenous businesses to invest in energy and infrastructure projects.
While implementing an Indigenous Procurement Policy in the NWT is one tool that will help bridge the economic gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, the BC Indigenous Procurement Initiative notes importantly that there are other barriers to Indigenous Business Development:
Many Indigenous people continue to endure racism along with the lasting impacts of colonialism and the dispossession of traditional territories, and the intergenerational impacts of residential schools and the Sixties Scoop. Discrimination creates barriers for Indigenous businesses and communities that are interested in doing business with government; therefore, different from other procurement approaches, Indigenous procurement requires government staff who are involved in each stage of the procurement process to incorporate a greater understanding of Indigenous culture, protocols, and values throughout.
Providing a range of other supports in addition to an Indigenous Procurement Policy is required to effectively increased Indigenous business development, especially to reach the small remote communities.
Recommendation 6: The Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment recommends the GNWT create and implement an Indigenous Procurement Policy that addresses economic gaps in the NWT by giving preference to Indigenous businesses.
Conclusion
This concludes the Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment’s Report on Supporting Northern Businesses. Committee would like to thank all presenters who came before Committee, including several appearances by GNWT departments to inform Committee’s review.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Your hard working Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment, I move, second by the honourable Member from Frame Lake, that the Committee Report 5319(2), Standing Committee on Economic Development and Environment Report in Supporting Northern Businesses be received today by the Assembly and referred to Committee of the Whole. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Member for Nunakput. The motion is in order. To the motion?
Question.
Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? Any abstentions? The motion is carried. Committee Report 5319(2) is referred to Committee of the Whole.
Carried
