Debates of March 30, 2022 (day 110)

Date
March
30
2022
Session
19th Assembly, 2nd Session
Day
110
Members Present
Hon. Diane Archie, Hon. Frederick Blake Jr., Mr. Bonnetrouge (remote), Hon. Paulie Chinna, Ms. Cleveland, Hon. Caroline Cochrane, Mr. Edjericon, Hon. Julie Green, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Martselos, Ms. Nokleby, Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Semmler (remote), Hon. R.J. Simpson, Mr. Rocky Simpson, Hon. Shane Thompson, Hon. Caroline Wawzonek (remote), Ms. Weyallon-Armstrong (remote).
Topics
Statements

Committee Motion 219-19(2): Concurrence Motion – Tabled Document 561-19(2): Main Estimates 2022-2023, Carried

Thanks, Mr. Chair. I move that consideration of Tabled Document 56119(2): Main Estimates 20222023 be now concluded, and that Tabled Document 56119(2) be reported and recommended as ready for further consideration in formal session through the form of an appropriation bill. Mahsi, Mr. Chair.

Thank you. The motion is in order. To the motion?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Question.

Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

Carried

Tabled Document 56119(2) will be reported as ready for consideration in formal session through the form of an appropriation bill.

Thank you. And thank you, Minister. Committee, we'll move on to the next item.

Committee, we have agreed to consider Bill 39: An Act to Amend the PostSecondary Education Act. I will ask the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment to introduce the bill.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm here today to present Bill 39: An Act to Amend the PostSecondary Education Act.

The PostSecondary Education Act received assent on August 21st, 2019, and is not yet in force. The act creates a structure for recognizing postsecondary institutions within the Northwest Territories and will enable the transformation of Aurora College into a polytechnic university.

The bill seeks to amend the PostSecondary Education Act to address gaps or inconsistencies in the act that were identified during the ongoing drafting of the related regulations. As well, an opportunity was identified to amend the section on Indigenous institutions to ensure it is more closely aligned with the 19th Legislative Assembly priority to implement the articles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Bill 39 will first remove an extra barrier for the recognition of Indigenous institutions by removing the requirement that Indigenous institutions first become recognized as postsecondary institutions through a separate process. The recognition process for Indigenous institutions will be determined through engagement with postsecondary and Indigenous government partners and will be set out in the regulations.

Bill 39 will also establish authority for fees and charges to be collected for certain services, such as quality assurance reviews or applications to ensure consistency and clarity within the act.

I wish to thank the Standing Committee for its thoughtful review and collaboration in helping to strengthen this bill through their motions to amend.

This concludes my opening remarks, and I would be pleased to answer any questions that Members may have regarding Bill 39. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you, Minister. Minister, would you like to bring witnesses into the Chamber?

SergeantatArms, please escort the witnesses into the Chamber.

Minister, please introduce your witnesses.

Thank you. With us today we have Andrea Giesbrecht, director of labour, development, and standards with the Department of Education, Culture and Employment; and Ian Rennie, legislative counsel with the Department of Justice. Thank you.

Thank you, Minister. I will now turn to the chair of the Standing Committee on Social Development, the committee that reviewed the bill, for any opening comment on Bill 39. Ms. Cleveland.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, Bill 39: An Act to Amend the PostSecondary Education Act received second reading in the Legislative Assembly on November 25th, 2021, and was referred to the Standing Committee on Social Development for review.

On March 24th, 2022, the standing committee held a public hearing with the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment and completed its clausebyclause review of the bill.

Committee passed two motions with concurrence from the Minister. Committee has read its report into the record and did not make this is and did not make recommendations. I thank the committee for their efforts in reviewing this legislation. Individual Members may have additional comments or questions.

I'm going to go back on this one and say we had two motions, and we passed two motions. One of them was not passed but concurred with with the Minister. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Ms. Cleveland. I will now open the floor to general comments on Bill 39.

Is the committee agreed that there are no general comments? Can we proceed to a clausebyclause review of the bill?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Thank you. Committee, we will defer the bill number and title until after consideration of the clauses. I will call the clauses in groups. Does committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Please turn to page 1 of the bill. Clauses 1 to 5, does the committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clauses 6 to 10, does the committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clauses 11 to 15, does the committee agree.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clauses 16 to 20, does the committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clauses 21 to 25, does committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clauses 26 to 29, does the committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Committee, to the bill as a whole, does the committee agree that Bill 39: An Act to Amend the PostSecondary Education Act is now ready for third reading?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Thank you, committee. Does the committee agree that this concludes our consideration of Bill 39: An Act to Amend the PostSecondary Education Act?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Thank you, Minister, and thanks to your witnesses. SergeantatArms, please escort the witnesses from the Chamber.

Committee, we have agreed to consider Bill 41: Justice Administration Statutes Amendment Act. I will ask the Minister of Justice to introduce the bill. Minister.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I am here today to present Bill 41: The Justice Administration Statutes Amendment Act.

Bill 41 is an omnibus bill and yes, we do have omnibus bills in this Assembly that advances amendments to three pieces of legislation:

The Jury Act;

The Summary Conviction Procedures Act; and

The Partnership and Business Names Act.

This approach was taken to streamline the process for advancing these three relatively minor amendments in a more efficient manner.

The changes being proposed for the Jury Act will ensure that territorial legislation regarding jury qualification standards match those of the Criminal Code as amended in 2019.

The changes proposed for the Summary Conviction Procedures Act will address three issues. They will ensure that forms of release referenced in the act coincide with the Criminal Code as amended in 2019; that appropriate language is included to fully authorize the prosecution and appeal of territorial offences on behalf of the Attorney General of the NWT; and

That the legislation allows for efficient payment and processing of specified penalties as set out in Summary Offence Ticket Informations.

Finally, the Partnership and Business Names Act will be amended by expanding the definition of "a person" to allow First Nations, or Indian Bands as defined in the federal Indian Act, to be limited partners in a limited partnership for the purposes of the Partnership and Business Names Act.

This concludes my opening remarks, and I would be pleased to answer any questions the Members may have regarding Bill 41. Thank you.

Thank you, Minister. Minister, would you like to bring witnesses into the Chamber?

SergeantatArms, please escort the witnesses into the Chamber.

Minister, please introduce your witnesses.

Thank you. With us, we once again have Mr. Ian Rennie, legislative counsel with the Department of Justice; and Mr. Brad Patzer, assistant deputy minister, Attorney General of the Department of Justice. Thank you.

I will now turn to the chair of the Standing Committee on Social Development, the committee that reviewed the bill, for any opening comments on Bill 41. Ms. Cleveland.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, Bill 41: Justice Administration Statutes Amendment Act, received second reading in the Legislative Assembly on December 7th, 2021, and was referred to the Standing Committee on Social Development for review.

On March 24th, 2022, the standing committee held a public hearing with the Minister of Justice and completed its clausebyclause review of the bill. Committee received no submissions on this bill. I thank the committee for their efforts in reviewing this legislation. Individual Members may have comments or questions. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you. I will now open the floor to general comments on Bill 41.

Is the committee agreed that there are no general comments.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Can we proceed to a clausebyclause review of the bill?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Committee, we will defer the bill number and title until after consideration of the clauses. Please turn to page 1 of the bill.

Clause 1, does the committee agree?.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clause 2, does the committee agree?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Clause 3, does the committee agree?