Debates of May 16, 2011 (day 8)

Date
May
16
2011
Session
16th Assembly, 6th Session
Day
8
Speaker
Members Present
Mr. Abernethy, Mr. Beaulieu, Ms. Bisaro, Mr. Bromley, Hon. Paul Delorey, Mrs. Groenewegen, Mr. Hawkins, Mr. Jacobson, Mr. Krutko, Hon. Jackson Lafferty, Hon. Bob McLeod, Hon. Michael McLeod, Hon. Robert McLeod, Mr. Menicoche, Hon. Michael Miltenberger, Mr. Ramsay, Hon. Floyd Roland, Mr. Yakeleya
Topics
Statements

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. We will now go to the bill itself. General comments. Mr. Abernethy.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I understand the reason for this bill and for the most part I reluctantly agree with forgiving some of these dollars.

There’s one area that I have a big problem with and that is there’s three debts in here that arose out of fraudulent activities against the GNWT. Specifically, people stole from the GNWT and they were given an order by the courts to pay back the GNWT a certain amount of money. Now, for some reason, we have failed to collect that money and the time is such that now they’re statute barred, which means it’s kind of impossible to collect the money. As a result we’re out about $50,000 that we could have collected from people who stole from us and it kind of rots my socks that we’re going to forgive these dollars.

Unfortunately, they are statute barred, which means we can’t do anything. But I think it’s important that we learn from this particular case. People do, from time to time, steal from the Government of the Northwest Territories and when they do steal from the Government of the Northwest Territories, there’s no reason that we should ever, especially when an order from the court has been given, ever let them get away with not paying back what they owe. If we don’t have policies and procedures to track these individuals so that we make sure that we’re on top of them from the minute an order is given until all the monies are collected, we should put those in place to make sure that when people do steal from us and are ordered to pay us back, that we’re on top of it and we collect the money.

So to the Minister today, I would like to seek some commitment from the Minister that some protocols or rules will be put in place to ensure that we never see a situation where we’re writing off debt or forgiving debt for individuals who have stolen from us. So to the Minister, will the Minister commit to putting in some policies, procedures to make sure that we track the dollars from individuals who have stole from us? In this case, three people are getting away with over $50,000 in what they owe us and, quite frankly, it’s unacceptable. We need to make sure it never happens again. Will the Minister commit to that?

Thank you, Mr. Abernethy. Minister Miltenberger.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’d just like to offer up the specific commitment, proceeded by just a couple of points.

Court orders for restitution become statute barred in the Limitations of Action Act after 10 years, not six years, as with other debts. The courts will not impose additional conditions on the debtors, such as keeping the GNWT informed of their employment status, whereabouts or marital status. It is the responsibility of the party whom the judgment is in favour of to be diligent in their collection efforts, because the courts will not take further action.

Additional action can be taken at the time of an application for judgment that would require the debtor to disclose, under oath, assets and particulars of employment. If the GNWT feels there are assets available to satisfy a debt, this information could then be used for additional collection action, such as writs against property or garnishees against wages.

It is possible to apply to the courts to renew an order prior to reaching the 10-year limitation. After reviewing these facts, the office of the comptroller general will implement processes pertaining to debts that arise from fraudulent activities to ensure departments that have secured judgments for restitution renew them with the courts if the judgment has not been satisfied within 10 years.

Procedures will also be established to ensure more aggressive action is taken at the outset of the application of a restitution order to take all possible steps to secure all possible assets of the debtor to settle the amounts outstanding.

Finally, I would just make the observation that as was pointed out by Ms. Lavoie, the assistant comptroller general, in her 10 or 12 years in her position she had never seen this type of restitution write-off before. So it’s brought to light a gap and we believe that this commitment will help close that gap and I thank the committee for raising the issue with us. Thank you.

Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Mr. Abernethy.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I’d like to thank the Minister and the comptroller’s office for making that commitment to making sure that people who steal from us don’t get to keep the money they stole. Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, Mr. Minister.

Thank you. Committee, general comments? Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is a similar issue I had as well in the committee, and it’s really about involvement from the Department of Finance side in the courts, whether it’s using our Justice people in particular to make a position known to the courts to ensure that the GNWT’s interest is exercised and acknowledged before the 10 years lapse through statute barred.

Mr. Chairman, I want to thank the Minister of Finance, obviously through the comptroller general for providing us this briefing note on debts that arise as a result of court ordered restitution. In short, the Minister read his briefing note that explained the process that they’ll start, and this was truly identified by committee at large to try to figure out ways to ensure that people who commit fraud aren’t, for the lack of a better term, rewarded by that process.

I want to acknowledge the work provided by the comptroller general who has found a way to help address this particular problem. As I explained to committee, my particular position is if we can articulate our voice early, if the person does fail to comply within a reasonable amount of time, hopefully the Department of Justice can make application to the court to either, as stated by the Minister, continue another order going forward or, of course, then proceed for failure of following through on a court order and then let the courts decide what’s appropriate at that time.

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. General comments. Hearing no more general comments, we’ll go to clause by clause. Is committee agreed?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Before we start that, we’ll defer that until we have looked at the schedule to the bill. Is committee agreed?

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Going to pages 3 through 5, schedule of debts forgiven, total $1,375,491.32.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Returning to clause by clause, page 1 of Bill 6, clause 1.

---Clauses 1 and 2 inclusive approved

Bill 6 as a whole.

Speaker: SOME HON. MEMBERS

Agreed.

Does committee agree that Bill 6, Forgiveness of Debts Act, 2010-2011, is now ready for third reading?

---Bill 6 as a whole approved for third reading

I’d ask the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witness from the Chamber. Mr. Abernethy.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I move that we report progress.

---Carried

Report of the Committee of the Whole

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Can I have the report from the Committee of the Whole, please, Mr. Bromley.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Your committee has been considering Bills 3, 4, 5 and 6, and would like to report progress. Bills 3, 4, 5 and 6 are ready for third reading. I move that the report of Committee of the Whole be concurred with.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. A motion is on the floor. Do we have a seconder? The honourable Member for Frame Lake, Ms. Bisaro.

---Carried

Before we go onto the next item on the Order Paper, colleagues, earlier today in the House the Member for Weledeh, Mr. Bromley, tabled a DVD video disk entitled Hand to Toe – And Explanation of the Art of Giving. Article 43 of the Rules of the Legislative Assembly permit a Member to table any document which is required to be tabled in the House by any act or order of the Assembly or which may be in the public interest. Upon initial review of the item tabled earlier today, I am not satisfied that Mr. Bromley’s item meets the test laid out in Article 43 of the Rules as it is clearly not a document.

As well, the Chair has some concerns about the reproduction of this item in the absence of the expressed written consent of the DVD’s producer.

As a result of these concerns, I am ruling Tabled Document 26-16(6) out of order. Thank you, colleagues.

Third Reading of Bills

BILL 8: AN ACT TO AMEND THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES ELECTIONS ACT

Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Deh Cho, that Bill 8, An Act to Amend the Local Authorities Elections Act, be read for the third time. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Bill 8 has had third reading.

---Carried

The honourable Minister of Finance.

BILL 12: SUPPLEMENTARY APPROPRIATION ACT (INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENDITURES), NO. 6, 2010-2011

Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Monfwi, that Bill 12, Supplementary Appropriation Act (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 6, 2010-2011, be read for the third time. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Bill 12 has had third reading.

---Carried

The honourable Minister of Finance.

BILL 13: SUPPLEMENTARY APPROPRIATION ACT (INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENDITURES), NO. 1, 2011-2012

Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Yellowknife South, that Bill 13, Supplementary Appropriation Act (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 1, 2011-2012, be read for the third time. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Bill 13 has had third reading.

---Carried

The honourable Minister of Finance.

BILL 14: SUPPLEMENTARY APPROPRIATION ACT (OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES), NO. 1, 2011-2012

Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Inuvik Boot Lake, that Bill 14, Supplementary Appropriation Act (Operations Expenditures), No. 1, 2011-2012, be read for the third time. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Bill 14 has had third reading.

---Carried

Orders of the Day

Speaker: Mr. Mercer

Orders of the day for Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 1:30 p.m.:

Prayer

Ministers’ Statements

Members’ Statements

Returns to Oral Questions

Recognition of Visitors in the Gallery

Acknowledgements

Oral Questions

Written Questions

Returns to Written Questions

Replies to Opening Address

Petitions

Reports of Standing and Special Committees

Reports of Committees on the Review of Bills

Tabling of Documents

Notices of Motion

Notices of Motion for First Reading of Bills

Motions

First Reading of Bills

Bill 20, Vital Statistics Act

Second Reading of Bills

Bill 15, An Act to Amend the Deh Cho Bridge Act

Bill 16, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act

Bill 17, An Act to Amend the Territorial Parks Act

Bill 18, An Act to Amend the Public Utilities Act

Bill 19, Cost of Credit Disclosure Act

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Bill 11, An Act to Amend the Public Service Act

CR 1-16(6), Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the Auditor General’s Report on the Deh Cho Bridge Project, 2011

CR 2-16(6), Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the Auditor General’s Report on NWT Health Programs and Services, 2011

CR 3-16(6), Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the 2009-2010 Human Rights Commission Annual Report

CR 4-16(6), Standing Committee on Government Operations Report on the Review of the NWT Languages Commissioner Annual Report 2009-2010

Report of Committee of the Whole

Third Reading of Bills

Bill 3, Electronic Transactions Act

Bill 4, Miscellaneous Statute Law Amendment Act

Bill 5, Write-off of Debts Act, 2010-2011

Bill 6, Forgiveness of Debts Act, 2010-2011

Orders of the Day

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Accordingly, this House stands adjourned until Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 1:30 p.m.

---ADJOURNMENT

The House adjourned at 5:29 p.m.