Daniel McNeely

Thank you, Ms. Green. Minister Sebert.

Thank you, Minister Sebert. Mr. Thompson.

Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thanks to the deputy minister for that reply. Is it the wish of the department moving forward into this new fiscal year to look at further, different federal funding sources to access to apply toward this special constable liaison program, if it is, in fact, one of the desires of the department? Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Minister Sebert. Ms. Green, I would like to point out that your line of questions is on the next activity, and we will bring that out when we go through the detail. Right now, we are discussing the operations expenditure for services to government activity. Any further questions to this activity and the detail? Seeing none, I will call this page. On 291, Department of Justice, services to government, operations expenditure summary, $11,908,000. Does committee agree?

Thank you, Minister Sebert. Your time has expired, Mr. Thompson. Did you want to go again? Okay. We'll reset. Mr. Thompson.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I am glad that allowance is budgeted for that purpose to provide this reintegration service. I am just curious on the historical justification on the success of it. If you see a need for it, I am glad it is there. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Ms. Bolstad. Ms. Green.

Thank you, Minister Sebert. Mr. Thompson.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My question is related to page 276, detail. This budgetary number of 179 supports this transitional program. It seems to be consistent, so it tells me that there is a demand. Could the Minister explain an example or examples of this cost allowance, if there are clients transitioning underneath this offender reintegration program? Thank you.

Thank you, Ms. Green. Minister Sebert.