Robert Hawkins

Statements in Debates

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

[Microphone turned off] …last year that dredging was actually paid for by the federal government and to what extent?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

Under legislative initiatives, what is MACA presently working on?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

How do we deal with site inspections on these particular initiatives? When the plans are submitted, sometimes site inspections are required.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

Mr. Speaker, when it goes $299 million and you say it’s close to $300 million, that is pretty well $300 million, so we can’t undersell this. I do not have the authority to release the risk matrix, but the problem is that the public is being denied the facts of how risky this project is and how scary it looks from this side of the House. Only the Minister has that authority.

Will the Minister release a plain language document, the details, the risks that have been identified and what potential burdens that Northerners may be taking on similar to what just happened to the Deh Cho Bridge? They...

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

So, other than the anomaly of the downturn in the market, is there a fee structure that’s changed that’s coming into the GNWT as far as lottery licence concern is? So would the downturn alone explain the drop from $75,000 in the last business cycle to an anticipated $50,000 in this one?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

Thank you. I look forward to that commitment and update.

Under contribution funding, we have contributions to the NWT Association of Communities and Local Government Administrators, as well as the Arctic Energy Alliance. Now is a good time to sort of ask what does our contribution work towards. Is it base funding or what type of accountability does our funding provide and what type of relationship have we struck with this, other than being a funding source? In some cases I know we sit on the board and I want to know what relationship. Thank you.

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

What’s the enabling document that defines who’s responsible for dredging?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

What are the main objectives of this strategic plan, the 2010-2015 plan?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Under the Fire Prevention Act, they appear to review plans for new construction. Can the Minister explain how this gets done if you happen to be somebody who lives in a community?

Debates of , 17th Assembly, 4th Session (day 18)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have to say that the $299 million was not hypothetical; those are the Minister’s own words. So let’s roll down to some of this.

It’s not hypothetical when the GNWT is brokering a deal with the federal government. So maybe the Minister can enlighten this House, and educate the public, on what the risks are with this particular deal if and when cost overruns do happen. And that’s not hypothetical because there’s not one single GNWT project that hasn’t had cost overruns. These are real risk matrix problems that the department will be working on.