Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate the comments from the Member. In regard to the reduced budget, part of the money that’s in the budget from last year that is not there this year yet is about $6 million that we got through special warrant and through the House to fight fires. So chances are, given the issue of the base budget, and the fact that things are drying out rapidly, and the relative humidity is dropping, and we’ve already had some fire starting, we will be back requesting further funding to fight fires as they do arise. So the $9 million, as the Member said, it is actually what we were cut. Six million dollars of that is tied to fire suppression and then there were some energy sunsets in there.
I appreciate his comments on the water work. The two main focuses for those areas are, of course, the transboundary negotiations and setting up the community-based water monitoring systems which are critical to the implementation of the Water Strategy, and the assurance and the knowledge it’s going to give us to make the right decisions as it pertains to water, resource development impacts that are happening in the region and the territory. At the same time, a lot of the work that we are doing right from waste management to biomass, geothermal, solar, as a government with building standards, all those things are geared to try to improve our energy use, minimize our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate as well as adapt. Once again, we’ve had this discussion in the House today. Could we do more if there were more resources? Without a doubt, Madam Chair.
The NTPC charges, we are looking at things. Just in my constituency, for example, there was a big debate about these demand charges. There was a big concern about interruptible power versus committed fees for power, especially if we’re going to encourage people to use electric, and those are things that we control and we just have to make sure we’re going to make the right decisions. But I appreciate the Member’s comments and I understand the concern there and I’ve heard it everywhere I’ve been, in regard to NTPC.
The Wildlife Act, as I indicated in my comments, we have half a million in the budget to move that piece of legislation forward, both in terms of doing the work, consultation, including funding the SWAAG group, the advisory group, the training and those types of things. I don’t have a specific breakdown in terms of how that money has been allocated so far, but that $500,000 is the global figure that’s there to do that.
The caribou herds we’re looking at are the Cape Bathurst, Bluenose-West, Bluenose-East, the Bathurst and the Ahiak. There was work done last year and we’re still pulling those numbers together. So when all those numbers are in this fall, we’ll be having a gathering around the table to see what the numbers and information tell us, and collectively we’ll be looking at the next steps.
In terms of forest fires, I’ll ask the deputy minister to give you a bit more of a background. I can tell you it’s hot and dry and no rain in sight and things are drying out fast, but I’ll ask the deputy, Madam Chair, with your indulgence, to just provide a bit more of an update. Thank you.
Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Mr. Campbell.
Thank you, Madam Chair. As we’ve all seen in the last few days here, it’s been quite hot and dry, and the southern half, especially, of the Northwest Territories is in that situation. We are more than likely a week to two weeks ahead of schedule in terms of the fire season. We ended up bringing on some of our crews and our tankers a week before schedule. Today we have all our tankers, aircraft and crews. All our resources are on strength at this time, and this current trend, this high pressure system we’re sitting under is forecasted to take us at least into mid-June with above normal temperatures.
We just had a bit of a lightning outbreak yesterday and four fires as a result of that. We’re experiencing fairly severe fire behaviour already and very early in the season, the end of May. That’s unusual and three of the fires that started last night were south of Behchoko. The community is safe. They had two previous burns before in the previous years. The latest two years ago and the latest update before I came over, there was three fires joined and they’re roughly around 800 or 900 hectares. There’s one more fire that’s close to the community of Gameti. We’re assessing it at this time.
Again, we’re heading into the prime time. We’re earlier than normal fire season, with severe burning conditions. Usually we’re good until middle of July, third week of July before things start slowing down, but again, many of our indices are higher than normal for this time of year.
Thank you, Mr. Campbell. Your time is up, Mr. Bromley, if you wish to go back on the list. I will go to Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Madam Chair, and welcome to the Minister and delegation from ENR here this evening. I want to first say I strongly commend the Minister and the department for a lot of the background work over the years, especially in transboundary agreements and water. So much so that I’ve read a recent book called Ethical Water, which places the NWT in the forefront of the actions of this government. So I think it’s important to give praise when praise is due and I think that’s important.
That said, water is an important component of ENR and it does touch other departments, as well, retrospectively. Drinking water has been obviously a passion of mine since I’ve been a new Member here of the House. The fact remains that there’s still some inconclusives, so to speak, in terms of the quality of the drinking water. Even though I know the quality is really good, we need to quantify that empirically with actual data and we know that there’s been challenges to affixing to the guidelines that this territory has to adhere to. That’s my question, is that really if there’s opportunity that I see within this government, is taking ownership to the guidelines and not passing it to the community governments or to the municipalities for enforcement. There really is no enforcement, Madam Chair. Regulations need to be on the forefront of our thinking moving forward. So if I see opportunity with this department, it’s to make sure that we put a bit behind the bite, so to speak, when it comes to water quality, management and drinking water guidelines. So I challenge the Minister to have his team work with the other departments in bringing those drinking water standards to levels which I think could prove that we are in great shape.
On the subject of water again – again there’s a bit of an overlap with MACA – a grave concern a lot of people in Yellowknife have is the fact that we’re looking at a relocation of our source water from the Yellowknife River to the bay area. Again, as I said, there are overlapping issues with departments, but water is water. Unfortunately, very little opportunity for financing from the GNWT, albeit we have similar financing in other communities. So I think the residents of Yellowknife, residents of Range Lake would be fitting the bill, so to speak, in the long term as a result of territorial government’s non-involvement or non-committed involvement in the relocation of source water. Given the fact that this is a practice that we see in other communities where this government is full force using full federal tax money to do that, why Yellowknife is being left off the grid, that’s a question to be answered.
On the subject of forest management, my concern – and I think the concern is with a number of people – is obviously the age of our aviation fleet. We’ve heard various degrees in terms of the viability of this fleet moving forward. I’m referring to the CL-215s. These are the workhorse of our fire forestry management. The cost to replace this fleet is insurmountable, one that has to have some extreme planning put behind. I know the Minister is frugal in making sure we are putting money away for a rainy day, $74 million in his budget, and I applaud him for doing so, but some of these costs are going to come to haunt us very soon. It would be nice to hear from the Minister or the department what the strategy is for replacement of the CL-215s. We need to hear it now during the early life of this Assembly so we can have plans of action.
Finally, it’s refreshing to know that the Wildlife Act is coming back on stream for review. We’re hoping, and I know a lot of the Regular Members were hoping, that the consultation process, the collaborative process with the public is one on which we can get those views back on the table. I believe a lot was learned in the last 10 years. A lot was learned specially in the dying days of the 16th Assembly. We applaud you and your team to get the right information out to the people so that we aren’t divisive on this subject, where we can live in harmony with tradition and harvesting, and we can make sure that there is a caribou industry and that we protect that industry moving forward, understanding the real impacts.
Madam Chair, I will leave it at that. More, again, good news on the forefront. That said, some opportunities that we do not see in this budget and it would be nice to hear some address to those concerns. Madam Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. I did regret at the outset to suggest we have response from the Minister to opening comments once they are all done. So if Members are agreed to that, we will carry on with Mr. Nadli.
Thank you, Madam Chair. In respect to the budget for this year, we’re setting the stage for the next four years. I’d also like to take the time to commend the department in terms of leading the charge, so to speak, in terms of the development of a Water Stewardship Strategy. I think that’s a very big plus. I think more than anything I would expect, through the association and support with First Nations, a very unique template in terms of water monitoring, water legislation, ensuring we always have access to fresh water. At the same time, it’s standardized so that it is publicly safe to consume and that the public has the confidence that we’re looking after the interest of the larger public, their safety and their overall health. I would really like to commend the department on that.
Of course, as we proceed forward, there are some other matters I think the department could maybe focus on. Another point I wanted to make is the Biomass Initiative is a very good initiative that complements communities and regions. It ensures the development of the forest sector. It provides opportunities for local businesses and local expertise, in conjunction with regional and district centres, to provide an alternative to find the cost of energy too much. We’re creating an option for them. I think that’s a very positive initiative that I hope will flourish as we proceed to doing this term of the 17th Assembly.
There are a couple of things that I’m kind of concerned about. Maybe I’ll spend a little bit of time trying to highlight them and then end off with some key things that I think are fairly reflective of comments of the Deh Cho constituency.
One of them is on the Wildlife Act. The Wildlife Act we’re going to revisit. This is something that’s been ongoing for some time. The greater interest that we should be focused on is we’re trying to meet the interests of all groups of the North and ensure we have bountiful wildlife. There is also the maintenance of subsistence culture activities. At the same time, we also work with the sport and recreation people that bring opportunities to big game outfitters that make their livelihood out on the land and bring tourists from all over the world to the North. We need to balance that. Of course, the department is very cognizant of some of the regional circumstances we have, such as regional land claims that have negotiated, with the federal government, certain provisions respecting that governments don’t abrogate or derogate their treaty and Aboriginal titles. So I think it’s something that will more likely come up as a discussion at some point on the Wildlife Act. But I think we have to be fairly optimistic. I think the department more likely, in the end, will come up with a stronger document that people will all agree to.
The other initiative that I think is fairly strong in the communities that I represent is tourism and just the potential as they look forward to the completion of the bridge. With the decline of sport hunting of caribou in the Barren Lands, we have more people from the North Slave region looking into the Deh Cho for opportunities either to hunt or to create business opportunities to create lodges for sport fishing or sport hunting. Of course, that puts pressure on the local populations for business opportunities. For harvesting it puts more pressure in terms of the sustainability of the natural resources that we have. Of course, with the coming of the bridge, we’ll have more access to the south of the Deh Cho and the north of the Deh Cho, and we’ll have more likely increased traffic and, at the same time, more marine operations in terms of people jumping in their boats in Hay River or Yellowknife and going down the Mackenzie. So I think people will more likely put constraints on the natural resources. Even, for that matter, sports fishing. For those reasons, I really think at some point the department needs to engage with the community in terms of monitoring efforts to ensure sport fishing is sustainable and that we all keep that in mind.
The last point I wanted to make is it’s my belief that this government should have a very integral role and critical role as Canada, as the Canadian government moves forward within two years to take over the chairmanship of the Arctic Council. I think we shouldn’t leave it to the feds to look after the interests of the Northwest Territories. This government needs to ensure we create a path of leadership ensuring northern interests are heard at the table, that we have at least a say how the agenda will be determined, and that we have a greater interest because we make the North our home. Through that, I think we need to make alliances with the northern communities that have the same ecology as we do and ensure we partner up with them. Based on that, I think we have some very unique plusses and one of them is this concept of traditional knowledge. I think First Nations have some very unique observations in terms of trying to balance that out with scientific knowledge and ensuring there are levels and efforts to ensure that the environment is sustainable and at the same time the wildlife population are at least monitored and protected. With those thoughts in mind, if we could play a greater role in the Arctic Council through the department and the GNWT and try to at least lay some foundation on how we’re going to be involved, I think some discussions of that nature would be very positive.
Thank you, Mr. Nadli. Next on my list is Mr. Yakeleya.
Thank you, Madam Chair. The Minister has a very important department that deals with the basics of our land, water, air, life, and the way we look at things. It’s very important. I’m not very pleased that his budget is being reduced. It actually should be going up. I’m not the one to make that decision. This budget here is low. The Minister has some very key initiatives that need to be looked at.
The Minister talked about the Mackenzie River Basin and the quality and quantity of water entering the Northwest Territories from neighbouring jurisdictions. In our land claim agreement it states, in the Sahtu Land Claim Agreement and probably as well as with other Aboriginal groups that have settled land claims, about the quality and quantity of the water not changing. If the Minister is working on the transboundary water agreements and if we are starting to see some changes, as people have noticed in my region, there are changes to the water quality, our water, then the federal government is not honouring their commitment, the spirit and intent of this specific chapter when we signed this land claim agreement.
The federal government has initiated some water monitoring community-based and it’s in the government’s plans right now, and I believe Fort Smith and Fort Resolution have been identified as two communities that have these water monitoring stations, community-based stations. There might be other ones that maybe the Minister could help me clarify. I think by having them in Fort Smith and Fort Resolution is a good start because that’s sort of the bottleneck where Fort McMurray, the Bennett Dam, the pulp mills, the Peace River, all that stuff is coming down. We don’t know what’s coming down. I know there are other monitoring stations in the North through Environment Canada and I believe that Minister Kent kept them open. I think there are 22 or 23. I could be corrected on that.
The Minister has a responsibility to ensure that our water is safe and that the other jurisdictions are not dumping their sewer waste into our system and that we’re going to be okay. A lot of my people live on the Mackenzie River. A lot of my people eat food from the Mackenzie. Lots of my people live off the land. We hunt moose and caribou and we certainly know that these animals also use the Mackenzie to sustain their life.
I want to make sure that we have a strong agreement that we could face the government of BC or Alberta or Saskatchewan and say this is what’s happening. This is what’s happening in our waters here. Make our agreement so strong that it would shut down possibly one of the industries to say quit putting your garbage into our water system.
We know the water is changing. I’ve talked to some elders in Fort Providence and they noticed that their fish is getting softer. They said a long time ago, about 50 years ago, the fish was firm. Now they say the fish are getting softer. Their body is soft, not like it used to be 50 years ago. That tells me something’s happening. I don’t know if it’s permafrost happening or climate change or the amount of chemicals in our water. Are we testing for the right chemicals? Are we testing for poison coming into our water? What are they dumping in our water from McMurray or the Bennett Dam?
This Minister has a lot of work. I look forward to his continued work and his continued charge on why we need a strong transboundary agreement with the other governments.
The Minister is also responsible for the Energy Efficiency Incentive Program. I look forward to seeing what type of support he’s also going to give to the people in Norman Wells. In his statement he provided focused assistance to the residents of Inuvik over the next year. I want to hope that the Minister would also do that for the community of Norman Wells for their support.
Within the limited time I have I want to ask the Minister in the recycling area that we have, I wanted to see if somewhere in his upcoming business plans or future discussions with his department he did a good job with the pop cans and plastic bags. I’d like him to see if he would do some work for the next couple years to see how we can get our vehicles out of our local dumps. There are lots of vehicles that could be chopped up with a mulcher in each community and put on the barge in the summertime, brought down south. Then that machine could go to another community and eat up those vehicles and do the same thing. It can be done over four or five years. We have a lot of old vehicles that have been in our dumps for the last I would say 50 or 60 years. I think the Minister should be able to put some plans together on how we get rid of these old vehicles.
I’m happy that the Minister is continuing to work on the Wildlife Act. I look forward to it getting some good discussions and some good air play in our communities. People can talk about the new Wildlife Act. It’s a long overdue act. It’s outdated. We need to modernize it and continue to work on it.
The Minister also has the role of traditional knowledge which I think needs to be supported and continued to have the effects down to different departments and especially his department.
We have some activity happening in the Sahtu and we certainly need to make sure that the cumulative impacts from resource development are monitored and studied up in our region because of the oil and gas play. Wildlife monitoring is taking place up in our region with all the oil and gas activity, the mining in the mountains. We need to know what’s happening with the permafrost. If they’re going to be drilling and doing hydraulic fracking, we need to have somebody on the ground looking at this type of thing that’s going to maybe be significantly ramped up in terms of resource development.
I look forward to going through some of the business plans, and I really hope that we have a good fire season and that it doesn’t get too busy and that this government here or this department here continues to support the people who have cabins. We need to know that these fires can be put out on the community’s needs.
Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. Are there any further general comments? I’ll go to the Minister for a response.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Once again I thank Mr. Dolynny for his comments on the water and the work that the department and the government have been doing, and his challenge to the government in terms of the regulation that’s needed. I know that there’s work underway between ENR, Health and Social Services, Public Works and Services, MACA, to ensure that we do all the things from the headwaters to the taps and beyond into the systems in people’s homes. It is going to be an issue of eventually moving from guidelines to regulations.
The issue of the relocation of the source water treatment plant from the Yellowknife River into the bay is going to be an issue that I’m going to leave for the Minister of MACA when the time comes. I’m not in a position to speak knowledgably about that.
The aviation fleet, the current contract expires in 2017. We’ve been on this now… This is the third year in terms of preparation, doing the research, bringing in consultants to review the service, give us a clear understanding of the options that are out there. We are now in the situation where the CL-215s that we do have are not going to be able to continue much longer. Simple things like access to avgas. The need to turbinize. If we keep them, turbinize the planes, if we were to stick with them, it would cost about $20 million or so a plane. So we are at work doing all the information gathering and assessments that we need to do to look at what options are there from the existing fleet being upgraded, buying new, leasing things like the air tractor, which is a smaller, more mobile, newer plane that is in use in a lot of other jurisdictions. We’ve had them up here doing some test runs last year. We’ve sent folks to observe them in action in other jurisdictions as well. Our intent is to move forward in a way that’s affordable. We now spend about $5 million a year just running and maintaining the CL-215s. There’s money that’s already in the budget to do that. We have to make the determination of the type of plane and the type of financing we need to do that.
In coming up, the other big issue that I would point out is: if we buy, we can’t afford to have our air force sitting in the snow bank eight months of the year. If we lease just by the year or X number of months a year it’s one thing. If we end up changing the arrangement, then we have to come up with a way to have that significant investment working more than four months a year. There’s lots of work to be done over the next number of years. The hope is to have this whole process ready, either through some type of call for proposals or very much ready for calls for proposals so that the incoming Assembly has either a process that’s underway or that we, this Assembly, will have concluded. We are on this one and paying very close attention.
I appreciate the Member’s comment, as well, about the Wildlife Act. We are working hard to be as collaborative as possible, recognizing that we have, I believe, a very good piece of work in terms of the Wildlife Act. There’s no other piece of legislation that was either done the way this one was done or is drafted up the same way, recognizing the same number of complex issues that are not even recognized in the current wildlife ordinance.
Mr. Nadli, as well, referenced a number of concerns about the water, similar to some of the other comments. I won’t repeat them, other than to say we are committed to negotiating a strong transboundary agreement. We want to be able to make sure that we are, in fact, negotiating hard-to-protect waters and the quality, and that when we look at quality it is detailed enough that so that we are, in fact, as Mr. Yakeleya indicated, taking into consideration are we measuring for the right things.
This is a changed world. There are lots of very complex substances out there and authentic acids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, bitumen, persistent organic pollutants. Any number of things in the water and in the air that we have to make sure we account for.
I would point out, as well, that we are putting our full effort as a government on this. Premier McLeod was down with the western Premiers in Edmonton and had an opportunity to have some discussions with Premier Redford about transboundary negotiations. We are in the process, as the department, of setting up our meetings with the Minister in Alberta, as well, to further those discussions. This is, for us, a full court press, given the significance of this issue.
The biomass initiative, I agree, is a good one. It’s gathering momentum. The government initially had to play a very major role, but now we have, for example, a private individual putting his own money on the table, seriously advancing a proposal for a pellet mill in the Northwest Territories, a significant pellet mill that will be able to supply the market now and into the future. That was always the goal for ourselves as a Legislature: build the market, build the industry; step one, step two. We are committed to that.
The technologies, as well, in biomass are improving rapidly. There is almost job ready advancements in bio fractionation, for example, where they can actually take biomass and convert it to diesel, convert it to avgas, convert it to any type of substance we need. There’s also a significant interest in work being done with natural gas, as well, being able to make the same alterations to the molecules to make it usable. So this is a rapidly advancing area.
The Wildlife Act, as I indicated, is a very important piece of work for us. It’s one of the reasons I ran for re-election, was to come back to see if we could get this approved in the House. I take Mr. Nadli’s comments about the many complex issues and the balance, and I would point out to him that anybody that reads that draft Wildlife Act and you look at the ordinance that is there that is currently governing us, it’s as close to night and day as you can come into pieces of legislation. The old legislation is archaic. It does not mention the word Aboriginal once, and there’s no mention of treaties, any obligation to Section 35, all those issues that have in some cases it predates. In addition to all the new ways of thinking of how we manage wildlife together, as he indicated.
We are interested in working with all the communities, especially in unsettled claims as we sort out the issues that the Member raised in terms of sport fishing and hunting. We’ve had a discussion in the House about the need to monitor fish stocks, especially during this time of the year when the fish are running and the folks come especially into the Member’s area to take advantage of the fish, to take as many as they can and…(inaudible)…them up and head back to Alberta. So we’re very committed to make sure we help manage that.
The Arctic Council, we are members on there, along with most other members of the circumpolar world. My understanding is Canada and the United States are going to be taking over the chairmanship, but we have a role at the table. I don’t have enough knowledge of the workings of the Arctic Council in terms of how they pick their chairmanship, but I can reassure the Member that we are fully engaged at that level. I know Premier Roland was there and Premier McLeod will be attending along with others, as appropriate, whenever there are meetings that take place.
Mr. Yakeleya indicated his concern about the budget. As I pointed out, this budget will be going up, assuming from all the trends that there are going to be fires and that we’re going to have to come back for supplementary appropriations. The money, as I pointed out to Mr. Bromley, that the money that was in last year’s budget included all the supps from firefighting that were one-time money, so those lapse. But every year we have been coming back so, unfortunately, I’m anticipating we’ll have to come back again this year.
I won’t review a bunch of the comments on water.
We are committed to working with Norman Wells in terms of their issue with their energy sources. We demonstrated that commitment and the level of that commitment in Inuvik. Not only this particular circumstance, but when we switched everybody off the old high-temperature system. We were there as well. The people of Norman Wells will not be abandoned. They will not be ignored as we work through with them their transition to another energy source.
The old vehicle recycling, I will tell the Member that just by sheer demand and limitation in terms of capacity, our focus, as our pointed out in my opening comments, is we’re looking at, in addition to all the things we’re currently doing, trying to get a grip on e-waste. The vehicle recycling is on the list but, once again, we’ve had to make choices and we’re of the opinion that there’s such a constant changing of electronic equipment and materials and it’s stockpiled all over and put into dumpsites, it’s the next pressure point in terms of the recycling.
The traditional knowledge, yes, we are committed. We are the lead department. We have it built into all the work we do working with co-management boards. We are the lead on the science research agenda. It’s a critical piece in there, as well, as we blend western science and traditional knowledge. As the Member knows, on the health side, for example, there are I think very interesting, proactive attempts with traditional knowledge. Education, as well, has a serious role to play with education and Dene Kede and all the other good work they’re doing with the curriculum.
As we proceed with the oil play for tight oil in the Sahtu and the issue of fracking and those types of things, there will be, clearly, a need for enhanced engagement and support in a whole number of areas, including the monitoring that the Member mentioned. Thank you.
Thank you, Minister Miltenberger. Is committee agreed we go to detail?
Agreed.
We are on page 13-8, information item, infrastructure investment summary. Any questions here? Seeing none, page 13-9, information item, revenue summary. Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Madam Chair. On 13-9 there is a recovery of the Mutual Aid Resource Sharing Agreement. There seems to be a zero entry for 2012-2013. If I can get a comment or action as to why as such. Thank you.
Thank you. Mr. Campbell.
Thank you, Madam Chair. The reason that line is zero this year is we’ve done further assessment of those costs when we do export our resources, and basically what it is, is we are just recovering our costs. We’re not generating any revenue from the MARS exchange. So it’s in discussion with Finance. They’ve agreed to not record it as revenue.
Would it be false for me to say this is actually a federal initiative or a federal amount of money that would have come to us and is not coming to us in 2013? Would it be fair to say that this has anything to do with personnel or aircraft, this amount?
Thank you. Mr. Miltenberger.
Thank you, Madam Chair. What we have here from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 is a change in accounting treatment. In the past we would list it on a revenue summary, but as we have gone through all our reviews, there’s no markup or profit generated. So there’s not a revenue, we just get compensated for our costs. It’s a mutual aid agreement and it could apply to aircraft, it could apply to crews and equipment as well. So this year it’s not going to be listed in revenue. Going forward, it won’t be an item in the budget anymore identified under the revenue summary.
I’m still a bit confused. Is this not, as I said, a federal initiative that we’re getting to help offset? If it is indeed a revenue, was treated a revenue in 2011-2012-2013, I’m getting the sense that this is somewhere else. If this is somewhere else, can the Minister indicate where is the recovery then? Thank you.
This is not a federal program. When it’s a federal program, all the provinces and territories have agreements signed with each other. So if there’s a significant demand in, for example, Ontario and they need help and they call us and we’re able to send people, we will do that and we will recover our costs. Henceforth, going forward forevermore it will be listed right now under page 13-38 under work performed on behalf of others. Thank you.
Thank you, Minister. You are referring to fire work, I presume. Right?
Yes, Madam Chair.
Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Madam Chair. If I heard correctly, I heard 13-38, work on behalf of others. There’s no category that deals with fire management or fire suppression. Again, can I get clarity from the Minister?
The acronym MARS stands for Mutual Aid Resource Sharing Agreement. That is the agreement that encompasses the arrangements for fire suppression sharing of resources. Thank you.
Thank you. Did you find it, Mr. Dolynny?
Yes, I did, Madam Chair. We’re not on page 13-38, unfortunately, but I don’t see an increase in that line entry. I assume we’ll want to talk about that when we get to that line as to how do we go from $300,000 to actually a decrease, if that’s indeed the changeover. Again, Madam Chair, we’re not at 13-38, so I will ask my question then. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. Mr. Nadli.
Thank you, Madam Chair. My question is not so much on a monetary matter but in terms of timber permits and licences. I think the Biomass Initiative is a fairly positive and forward initiative that complements local skills. I think one of the obstacles that some organizations have is access to lands and areas where there has been an effort to do an inventory and analysis in terms of the tree species and whether they are prime for harvesting. My question is: How is the department trying to mitigate access to forested areas in terms of trying to make biomass successful?
Thank you. Minister Miltenberger.
Thank you, Madam Chair. There are two main areas. We are continuing to work on inventories of the forest, and an equally important piece, especially as you look at the possibility of a biomass plant being put up that could do as many as 30,000 metric tons, are these forest management agreements that would have to be entered into with the Aboriginal governments and the GNWT to be able to have access to the material to generate the pellets in a sustainable, go-forward basis so the person or the business making the pellets is able to buy the material to make the pellets.
Forest management agreements are going to be very critical pieces of work. There are none in existence right now. We have staff hard at work sorting out how we do that, so when we move forward with the negotiations with the various partners in this whole operation, we can make sure we have knowledge of what’s there and agreements that lay out how that resource will be used over time. Thank you.
Just for clarification, what is the term life of a forest management agreement?
At this point, we’re looking at agreements that would last 15 or 20 years.
Thank you. Mr. Nadli, we are on revenue. We are on the revenue summary. If you have further questions, maybe they can wait for the forestry management section. Yes, they can? No, they can’t?
Yes. If I could, I would just like to ask a final question, Madam Chair. Thank you for the response in terms of clarifying the forest management agreement with more likely local organizations for terms of 15 years.
Is there an effort to try to ensure that communities, if at the local level the department is equally going to work parallel with them to ensure they build up capacities at the same time? It’s a cooperative effort so, in the end, there’s a forest management agreement that’s beneficial to both the government and local organizations. Does the department have a position to try to help with capacity issues with local organizations? Thank you.
Thank you. Minister Miltenberger.
The forest management agreements have been triggered specifically by the project that’s under consideration right now, or development right now for a pellet plant. We, ITI, the government is at the table trying to do our part. The arrangements between the business in the communities in terms of negotiating access to the material, the capacity building, are going to be driven through that business arrangement. There will still be ongoing access to existing programs that the territorial government now has that could be possibly brought to bear, as well, but the main relationship will be between the communities and the proponent who has laid out quite extensively the capacity building, training, local employment and all these critical areas. There is no request for territorial money in this project either. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Nadli. Mr. Bromley.
Thank you, Madam Chair. My question is on the hunting and fishing licences, the decrease in revenue there of $50,000. That’s obviously a lot of licences. I understand that I would expect licence fees to have dropped when we stopped caribou hunting, but I’m wondering what this estimated decrease in revenue is caused by. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Mr. Campbell.
Thank you, Madam Chair. The decrease there reflects to some degree, I guess, the lack of access to caribou tags. The primary reason is the decrease in the sale of fishing licences. I think not just in our jurisdiction but other jurisdictions are experiencing the same. The major area in the decrease is the fishing licences.
Thank you, Mr. Campbell. Mr. Bromley. Any further questions on page 13-9, Environment and Natural Resources, department summary, information item, revenue summary?
Agreed.
Page 13-10, Environment and Natural Resources, department summary, information item, active position summary.
Agreed.
Page 13-13, Environment and Natural Resources, activity summary, corporate management, operations expenditure summary, $11.171 million. Mr. Bromley.
Thank you, Madam Chair. My constituency includes a First Nation that has not yet resolved their land claim issues and their land claim. I’m wondering why we are discontinuing the Interim Resource Management Assistance Program agreement, about $305,000 the last couple of fiscal years. I know that the Yellowknives Dene certainly valued that program and I’m wondering if I can get an update on what the thinking is there. Perhaps that’s a federal program that was sunsetted or something, but maybe I can get an update on that.
Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Mr. Miltenberger.
