To the motion. Mr. Yakeleya.
I just want to thank the mover and the seconder on this motion here. We’re talking about education, which has been a long-standing issue in this government. This is not something new. Over the years, as an MLA, and as the Minister is well aware – this issue is not new to him – we’ve been talking about the quality of education for a long time. Whether it’s in Yellowknife or it’s in the small communities such as Colville Lake, we’ve been talking about the quality of our education and the quality of our certificates that we give our Grade 12 students, called diplomas.
When I read that we’re the lowest in Canada in regard to our schooling, our education quality, that is shocking. I want to say to the parents and to the Ministers, would we stand for this. Are we going to stand for this? I know parents in southern Canada would not stand for this. If you’re educated, you grew up in southern Canada, you would have a high quality of education. Parents would not stand for this. Why are we standing for this in the Northwest Territories? It’s not okay.
Parents down in the southern parts of Canada will say, what’s wrong with you guys. Why are you doing this to your children? Stand up, for Pete’s sake, and fight for them. We won’t stand for it in Ontario, B.C., Alberta. It’s ludicrous.
I think that’s a real challenge to us, because we’ve got some really smart kids in the North. Some of them are really good. They sacrifice, they do the work, and they make it through. They make it through to university or college. Good for them. Good for the parents. They sacrificed. They know. But our indicators and our records show that that does not happen, especially in the smaller communities where Mr. Dolynny has mentioned. It’s pathetic when you see students that are falling behind. It’s pathetic that we’re allowing this to happen. We as legislators, the ones who put their X beside us and said do something about this, that’s what our job is.
I think we’ve really got to rethink and reload. I mean, there were students around this table here that had gone into the old system, Grandin College, Grollier Hall, Akaitcho. I talked about that in my Member’s statement, that we’ve come out okay. We had to sacrifice, but we had to sacrifice to get a good education, so when we graduated, we knew that it was a good Grade 12 diploma, and you can take it to the bank and say cash this in because I have a career. I don’t have to go down to the loans and say I need another year; lend me some more so I can pay off my debt. We had good education but it was at a sacrifice. That’s what I’m talking about. We’ve got to emphasize that.
The young people, how is it that when you first take your children to school, they’re all excited? They want to learn. You know, kindergarten, Grade 1, 2, but over the years, somehow, they seem to regress, and after a while, in Grade 10 or 11, they’re like this and hard to talk to. They don’t really want to share. How is it that they move through that system? I don’t know. I mean, something happens. Where is that excited 6-year-old, 7-year-old, 8-year-old, all excited to learn, all that energy? Is it our system that dampens that spirit and soul, and that shuts down their individuality and creativity and spontaneity? And we’re just telling them they will acquire this information and gain this knowledge. I don’t know. There’s some real serious thinking here. How do we take care of this in our school system?
Three more points I want to touch on. This motion is about our system here and it’s about the relationship with families and involving the families into our school system. The real education begins at home, about values, belief and hard work and sacrifice. We cannot just send our kids and say to the teachers, take care of them for the next six hours. And by the way, little Johnny needs this, this and this, he doesn’t like this, he doesn’t want this. We have to be there with them. We have to be there with the teachers. They have enough on their hands to teach the children. We’ve got to build that relationship with the families.
We certainly learned a good lesson when the government implemented the residential school system, but we need to move from that and say that’s no longer there, and move to a new system of saying we want the families involved. How do we involve the families? There are ways.
My last two points, and again, one of the Members brought it up. It’s no different for us being legislators in this government here. If we’re not here, then we miss important information. It’s no different than attendance. You can have the best curriculum, but if you don’t have the student there, it doesn’t do us any good. It’s just like a sports team, I said at one time. If you’re not practicing with the team and you only want to come when the games are, it’s not good. You’re missing key pieces of the information to be a good player. Just like school. You’ve got to show up to grow up and to be there. That’s really, really key. That’s what we’ve got to stress, and that’s how we’ve got to work with the families.
My last point is that we need to do something new. It was done in the old TEST program in Inuvik with the skiing program. We have to look at something like that where it involves sports in school and it does wonders. We should have a TEST program in our school or one of our regions or something, so we can use sports as a means to put a group of students through a school system where they can excel at a national/international level. We had the first sisters, the Allens, the Lennies, the Cooks. We have all these great skiers. I say that we have wonderful athletes, also, so we could look at a TEST program that would help with our education.
I thank the mover and seconder for bringing this very important motion to the floor to have some discussion. I certainly look forward to working with the government on how to develop something within the next two years that could raise the numbers of our students in Canada and not be the lowest. It’s not good to be at the bottom. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. To the motion. Mr. Moses.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I stand here today and I want to thank the mover and seconder for bringing this motion forward. Yesterday we had a strong discussion and strong information brought forward to this House, so the public could understand why we bring motions like this to the floor of the House.
The Education Renewal Initiative is going to be a 10-year plan, so this government has the responsibility and the decisions to put what goes into this plan, something that’s going to be concrete for our future leaders. As I mentioned earlier in my Member’s statement, we do have an organization down south that is doing great work for our youth and yet we are having a hard time providing the same type of quality service here in the North.
Over the next 10 years, all the information that’s going into this ERI document is going to be an investment. This government is going to have probably one of the greatest investments in our youth and the return on our investments is going to be priceless. We are going to have people that are educated, with quality education and quality educators that are going to contribute back to the society and that’s going to increase a sustainable economy here for the Northwest Territories.
In this motion it talks about community-based, GNWT-supported early childhood initiative programs and that’s where we have to start our investment. As I said yesterday, I have taken a strong interest in education, more into early childhood development being part of this Legislative Assembly and will continue to support throughout my term.
Like I said, I will be supporting this motion and thank all Members who have stood up and spoke in favour of early childhood development and making sure that this document that goes out to the community, that this document gets input from the communities, from the educators, from all those that are involved in education.
Like I said, I will be supporting this motion. I hope that this government does the right thing and that we have a strong investment in the future of our territory and the future of our leaders and our students. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Moses. To the motion. Mr. Hawkins.
Mr. Speaker, certainly I will be supporting the motion. I was proud to be able to second this.
Quite often, we often think of education as such an amazing thing and here we have an educational renewal document that many educators are telling me that they’re concerned about the lack of input. If we want to do it right, we have to make sure we get off on a good foot. Any home builder will tell you that you can’t construct a good, sound, quality home without building a solid foundation. I consider this 10-year plan, this renewal, should be a solid foundation, one that is so firm and so strong it cannot be cracked or questioned. It should be the equality that we would be looking to our gold standard, so when we look to the foundation, is that quality there.
A number of educators have told many of us, some school boards have told us, consultation in some manner might have felt like they walked in one door and were in a hurry to get out the next. Where is the community consultation? We’ve heard from a number of people. I, like Mr. Yakeleya, know differently. When I dropped off my children at school, I looked in their eyes and thought of hope and promise. I look to the teachers. I give my children to the teachers and I look at why they do their job, because they’re deeply passionate about being involved with young minds, fostering opportunity, giving them hope for the future. I, similarly to Mr. Yakeleya, question where does that hope sometimes go with some of these students. That alone should be a call to arms.
One of the most significant problems we deal with here today, and I will lay two of them out, are certainly education and health. This happens to be one of the pillars of why many of us are here, which is education.
We must work with our educators to ensure that they get the best plan to help work with our children. We must be behind the educators to do this. The educators must be involved. The best gift I can give my children, besides health, obviously, is a good education. I question have we given them the best gift.
Fostering this opportunity must be a relentless challenge we continue to ask ourselves. We must find ways to help build those skills and certainly build those abilities within our young people and certainly give the right tools to every educator to be able to help build that future that is limitless for every young person. But often we hear comments in the sense of statistics, as highlighted by Member Dolynny, who is right. Kids aren’t going to school. That should be a question in and of itself. Kids aren’t finishing school with quality education. Where is the kicking and screaming? Kids that are graduating at the top of their class find that they’re at the bottom of the class elsewhere. They can’t even get into the class when they are actually tested. These are questions that need answering and I’m not sure that this education renewal is answering them in the way that needs to be done.
School boards want more, educators want more, MLAs want more, parents want more. We all want more out of this renewal program. I have yet to find someone who says this was the best we could have done.
I will be supporting this motion. I would say that, if it was my opinion, I think it needs to be reworked. I’m not suggesting those who didn’t do their job didn’t try; I just think we could do better. It’s not for me, it’s not for my colleagues, but for the kids that we want to give that limitless opportunity we call education to. Without that opportunity, we’re denying them their rights. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. To the motion. I will allow the mover to close debate. Mr. Menicoche.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I’m very glad to hear the passion which a number of Members have been speaking about with the Education Renewal Initiative. I think it’s important, as well, to tell the teachers, the principals, the assistants out there, they are doing good at their front-line work, they are working hard, but we’re talking about a system here that hasn’t been working for a long time.
Our children are failing because we are failing, failing to ensure that they are the smartest and the brightest by having the best education system available. We’re failing to support them, that they will support us in the future.
The 17th Assembly is going to be well known because of devolution. It’s one of the legacy things that the 17th Assembly will leave behind, but I also want the 17th Assembly legacy to be about education renewal.
This will be a true legacy that this Legislature can leave behind. We simply must ensure our students are well educated for our future. We have to give them the drive and desire to learn. It’s not enough to have an education mission statement. We need leadership and desire to make this change. We have to give them dreams. Is it because we stop dreaming? We have to give them dreams about being firemen, RCMP, teachers, engineers, doctors, management and MLAs as well. But we have to have a dream so that they can have the dream. I think it is the dream of Members on this side today. Let’s have a true change to our education system by getting out there, hearing the teachers, the parents, the communities, and it’s about having the right resources. I think we spoke about the wrong programming. We have to have the right resources and give them the right programming. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Menicoche. The motion is in order. To the motion.
Question.
The motion is carried.
---Carried
Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I seek unanimous consent to deal with Motion 6-17(5) which I gave notice of yesterday.
---Unanimous consent granted
Mr. Dolynny, you may proceed.
WHEREAS alcohol abuse is a prevalent problem in NWT communities and is evident on Yellowknife streets and in the downtown core;
AND WHEREAS in 2011 Yellowknife ranked third out of 238 Canadian cities with a population of over 10,000 people for the severity of its crime;
AND WHEREAS alcohol abuse is one of the biggest challenges to policing in communities across the Northwest Territories;
AND WHEREAS the enforcement of liquor laws can help to curb instances of open liquor, public drunkenness, underage drinking, the use of alcohol while operating a motor vehicle, and infractions under the Liquor Act by licenced establishments;
AND WHEREAS the enhanced enforcement of liquor laws helps to ensure increased public safety;
AND WHEREAS municipal enforcement officers currently have the authority to inspect licensed premises and to make liquor-related traffic stops, but do not have the authority to enforce liquor laws regarding public drunkenness, open liquor and underage drinking;
AND WHEREAS strengthening the ability of municipal enforcement officers to enforce liquor infractions would, in NWT communities that have a municipal enforcement presence, address a perceived shortfall in policing;
AND WHEREAS giving municipal enforcement officers the authority to fully enforce NWT liquor laws would enable a municipality to take on this enhanced responsibility only if the municipality chooses to do so;
NOW THEREFORE I MOVE, seconded by the honourable Member for Inuvik Boot Lake, that this Legislative Assembly recommends that the Minister of Finance undertake discussion and amendments to the Liquor Act or other legislation, as required, to provide municipal enforcement officers with the authority to enforce liquor infractions;
AND FURTHER, that the Government of the Northwest Territories provide a comprehensive response to this motion within 120 days.
Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. The motion is in order. To the motion. Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, colleagues. I’d first like to thank the honourable Member for Inuvik Boot Lake, Mr. Alfred Moses, for seconding this motion allowing this debate to occur.
Mr. Speaker, this motion today is a culmination of some hands-on exposure, the first of which stems from my experience in accompanying local RCMP and municipal enforcement division officers during a number of summer ride-alongs. It was evident early on that the opportunity of expanding the scope of practice for municipal enforcement officers in the area of alcohol-related infraction clearly would have been beneficial in enhancing the public safety in our downtown core.
My second exposure was also echoed during the recent Yellowknife town hall meeting on public safety. It was evident then that residents wanted tangible solutions to address the safety concerns of our walking trails and our downtown corridor.
These experiences allowed me to do the proper research and put pen to paper in seeking out these tangible solutions within our legislation.
As legislators, we have the duty to assist our local police forces to do their job as efficiently and effectively as possible. This motion today speaks to how we can do this by helping create the right legislative environment that promotes ease of enforcement to the issues that matter most to NWT residents.
We see the impacts of alcohol abuse on Yellowknife streets and in many of our communities, where public drunkenness and open liquor are, unfortunately, all too common.
It is also a well-known fact that alcohol is a factor in a vast majority of crimes committed in the capital city and we have the sobering statistics to confirm this. According to Statistics Canada Crime Severity Index, in 2011 Yellowknife ranked third out of 238 Canadian cities with a population over 10,000 people for the severity of its crime.
To add fuel to this statistic, this summer, while speaking with Northern News Services, Inspector Frank Gallagher, detachment commander for the Yellowknife RCMP, said alcohol abuse is the biggest challenge to policing in Yellowknife. Given these facts, it was indeed a surprise to learn that, unlike the RCMP, municipal enforcement are limited in their ability to enforce NWT liquor laws. They have the authority under the Motor Vehicles Act to make traffic stops if they suspect impaired driving on municipal streets and they have authority to inspect and deal with liquor infractions taking place in licenced premises, but they do not have the authority to deal with public drunkenness, open liquor or underage drinking. This means that our municipal enforcement officers are powerless to deal with public drunkenness even when we know abuse of alcohol is the single biggest factor contributing to crime on our streets.
Mr. Speaker, this is why we have the motion before us today. Our current legal framework does not make any sense to me. Peace officers, whether they are RCMP or municipal enforcement officers, have a duty to protect public safety and should be given the tools and authorities they need to deal with all liquor infractions.
Members of the public are scared in their own city and expect action. Enhancing the authority of municipal enforcement officers to effectively deal with all alcohol infractions can only serve to reduce the frequency of alcohol-related problems which, in turn, can help reduce alarming incidents of crime plaguing our community.
We owe a debt of gratitude to members of our police forces across the NWT for the hard work they do and the sacrifices they make to keep our families safe from harm. This motion today spans a security blanket we hold dear, and speaks to the future discussion and possible amendments to the Liquor Act or other legislation allowing this expanded scope of practice to municipal enforcement officers to adequately deal with liquor infractions.
Of course, we fully realize that strengthening the ability of municipal enforcement officers will require proper training and liability to enable a municipality to take on this enhanced responsibility. This is a given.
However, this motion seeks only that the Minister of Finance undertake discussion and look at possible amendments to the Liquor Act and other legislation and nothing more. In the end, we know we have much consultation ahead of us to work with all NWT municipalities with municipal enforcement officers and the NWTAC, and we must, as always, make sure we have the right legislation in place so when a municipality is ready to act, they have a choice before them and are not waiting for legislative changes.
Again, I want to thank the House for allowing me to raise this motion today and I look forward to everyone’ s comments and support. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. I will allow the seconder of the motion to speak, Mr. Moses.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I seconded the motion on the hard work of Mr. Dolynny and all the research he’s done into this and taking the initiative to do the ride-alongs in the city of Yellowknife. We do have a growing concern in my community of Inuvik as well. It started out with the Town of Inuvik making this public, the town council actually, and going to the paper to discuss some of the issues around open alcohol in the downtown core of Inuvik on Mackenzie Road.
On my last trip home, I had a talk with the RCMP and how they’ve changed their policies so they won’t have to deal with anybody who has open alcohol or under the influence in terms of not taking them into the jail cells and taking them to the hospital which, in turn, reflects more visits going to the emergency room. So, obviously, this is not only affecting the public, but it’s affecting how people do their jobs. It’s one of the biggest concerns for the RCMP, and it really exhausts the resources the RCMP has when they can be working and doing other work, such as drug enforcement or other crimes, that they could put their time and effort to.
I have stood in this House talking about mental health and addictions. This falls right into the same category. The motion itself is a study. I would like to see it taken one step further and have a policy in place or amendments to the act. All it’s doing is providing us with another set of eyes on the road. Obviously, bylaw sometimes do spot checks. They will be driving around the communities. If they see any infractions, they would be able to address them, but also looking at the protocols and regulations as we move forward on such an important issue, obviously under the proper training that will be required. It provides us with safer roads in our communities. It provides us with safer communities.
One suggestion that was brought to our attention from our staff sergeant in Inuvik, but also our CEO at the hospital, is maybe we bring up the Minister of Health and Social Services and the Minister of Justice and do a ride-along, such as Mr. Dolynny did here in Yellowknife, and we could see the real issues, not only on the streets of Inuvik but what’s happening in the emergency rooms, and talk to the people dealing with these issues that are happening right now.
So I thank Mr. Dolynny for bringing the motion forward and I encourage all colleagues to support the motion and speak to it. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you, Mr. Moses. To the motion. Ms. Bisaro.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to thank the mover and the seconder of the motion for bringing it forward. This is a motion which I can fully support. I’ve spoken to the issue of alcohol in my own community and in all NWT communities many times. It’s an issue which, unfortunately, is going to take very many years before it will ever go away. I suspect it won’t ever go away fully.
It’s been spoken to I think by a couple of the Members already, but alcohol is involved in, obviously, the majority of incidents that the RCMP and/or the municipal enforcement officers deal with. It takes up a huge amount of police time, and whether it just be somebody who is drunk on the streets or whether it be somebody who is drunk and then commits a crime, it’s a requirement of the police that they have to deal with it, and much of the time they’re dealing with what could be considered nuisance incidences.
This motion asks for the authority for municipal enforcement officers to be able to enforce liquor laws. Anything that is going to assist the RCMP and allow them to get away from having to handle nuisance calls, for instance, it will allow them to deal with the bigger crimes, which certainly happen all too frequently, unfortunately.
The motion asks that the authority be provided for municipal enforcement officers to be able to enforce liquor laws. It does not require that all communities will have to take part on that. It simply will give authority and it will be there for those communities who wish to take part, those that have municipal enforcement officers and that they wish to expand that scope of practice of those officers.
I recognize that there are legislative requirements that would be required, and that again goes to what the motion is asking. The motion is asking for this to be looked into, to determine what kind of legislative amendments need to be made, to determine all the parameters around making this change and we can then determine whether or not it’s something that we should go forward with. The fact that this is asking for a discussion of the issue is something that I fully support. It’s not demanding that we do this, but it’s asking us to look at it. Hopefully, it will turn out for the positive and then a community like mine, who has municipal enforcement officers, will be able to take advantage of that extra authority and improve the like, so to speak, in my community. Thank you.
Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. To the motion. Mr. Miltenberger.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We appreciate this motion being brought forward. It supports the work that has been underway for some time with Justice and Finance on looking at this issue, looking at whether we need to change our legislation or whether in fact it can be done through community municipal bylaws. The City of Yellowknife expressed some time ago, as well, an interest in having this matter explored so that collectively we’ll get to where we have to go. As this is direction to Cabinet, we will be abstaining. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Close debate. I’m just going to remind Members to put your hands up a little bit quicker so we can see it because I closed debate already, but I’m going to allow Mr. Yakeleya and Mr. Hawkins to go. Mr. Yakeleya.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate this. I just want to say I’m going to support this motion because it talks about a discussion in looking at some of the possibilities of amending the Liquor Act or any other type of legislation with the issue that Mr. Dolynny talked about with municipal law enforcement and, of course, the authority to help with the issue here in Yellowknife and possibly other communities if they so choose.
So, I’m going to support the motion based on it entering discussions, not do anything but entering in discussion. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. To the motion, Mr. Hawkins.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Undoubtedly, I have no issue whatsoever in supporting this particular motion.
We must seize upon every single opportunity to help solve this problem. This is not the panacea for this issue, but yet it is moving the file forward. Enforcement of liquor laws is a necessity. We cannot miss any opportunity to do this. We must not get distracted by the fact that, yes, this is a new adventure that we must be heading into, but we must see it as truly an opportunity to do something for this particular problem.
Abuse of alcohol certainly has been well stated, well written and will continue to be well argued about in this Chamber for many years to come, but by doing nothing works to solve this problem by ignoring this opportunity. So I would say that if we can find ways to further help inspections, to help decrease some of the problems, to help work in partnership with our RCMP partners, this is the right way to go.
It’s been mentioned many times over the years, as well, and I’ve witnessed it myself when I used to work at the correctional centre many years ago, three-quarters of the people that were incarcerated all were there for some reason connected to some type of substance abuse. Although we’re not here to debate addiction problems, what it does is further emphasize that people who are trapped in these terrible cycles of addiction, such as things like alcohol, need to be addressed. This doesn’t necessarily address, again, the addictions issue, but continues to underscore about these problems being allowed to get out of hand.
What the innovation of this motion really speaks to is opening the doors to help solve the problem. This would be a missed opportunity if the government doesn’t seize the message in this motion. As such, again, I will be supporting it. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. To the motion. Mr. Bromley.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Very briefly, the public drunkenness, open liquor and underage drinking that has been mentioned as the focus of this effort is something that does need to be addressed and represents, really, a huge part, a huge bolus of the instances that our RCMP are forced to deal with, despite many other competing priorities. There typically are other resources that could be put to work to help in this regard.
I’d like to thank my colleague Mr. Dolynny, Mr. Mover, for bringing this forward and I will be supporting it. I also appreciate the recognition of the possible need for some training and that could be part of the analysis to avoid safety compromises, of course, and also some liabilities due to lack of training, or, of course, gross negligence in the delivery of program activity that could happen without training.
I also note, importantly, that I think the ability of municipalities to opt in or not is an important feature and should be carried forward. This really is about public safety and it’s a good move. I will be supporting it, as I mentioned, and I thank my colleagues again for their support. Mahsi.
Thank you, Mr. Bromley. To the motion. I’ll allow the mover of the motion to have closing remarks. Mr. Dolynny.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, colleagues. I know it’s been a long day and a long couple of weeks, so I appreciate everyone allowing good debate on this. I want to thank the seconder, Mr. Moses, for allowing this debate to occur today and I want to thank all the Members here who took the time to speak towards this motion and provided some good ideas and some great thoughts. Of course, I want to thank Minister Miltenberger for again addressing it and I’m encouraged by his words today. I’d also like to thank the many residents who e-mailed and called in support of this motion in the last couple of days and, of course, the elected City of Yellowknife officials who took the time to write in some letters of support, which I’ve tabled earlier today. Finally, Mr. Speaker, I’d be remiss if I didn’t thank our legislative research staff and our in-house legal support. Without them, I can guarantee you that this motion would not have seen the light of day here in the House. So with that, I’ll conclude and I will be seeking a recorded vote. Thank you.
Mr. Dolynny, Mr. Hawkins, Ms. Bisaro. Mr. Moses, Mr. Bromley, Mr. Yakeleya, Mr. Blake.
All those opposed, please stand. All those abstaining, please stand.
Mr. Beaulieu, Mr. Abernethy, Mr. Miltenberger, Mr. McLeod – Yellowknife South, Mr. McLeod – Inuvik Twin Lakes.
All those in favour, seven; all those opposed, zero; all those abstaining, five. The motion is carried.
---Carried
Item 18, first reading of bills. Mr. Miltenberger.
Mr. Speaker I seek unanimous consent to proceed with first reading of Bill 7, Supplementary Appropriation Act (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 1, 2014-2015.
---Unanimous consent granted
I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Great Slave, that Bill 7, Supplementary Appropriation Act (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 1, 2014-2015, be read for the first time.
Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Bill 7 has had first reading.
---Carried
Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Thebacha, that Bill 1, Reindeer Act, be read for the second time.
This bill sets out the provisions of the Northwest Territories Act (Canada) respecting reindeer, including the regulation-making authority that will enable the Government of the Northwest Territories to substantially mirror the Northwest Territories Reindeer Regulations made under that act, as required by the Northwest Territories Lands and Resources Devolution Agreement.
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The motion is in order. To the principle of the bill.
Question.
Question has been called. Bill 1 has had second reading.
---Carried
The honourable Premier, Mr. McLeod.
Mr. Speaker, I move, seconded by the honourable Member for Great Slave, that Bill 2, Archeological Sites Act, be read for the second time.
This bill sets out the provisions of the Northwest Territories Act (Canada) respecting archaeological sites and artifacts, including the regulation-making authority that will enable the Government of the Northwest Territories to substantially mirror the Archeological Sites Regulations made under that act, as required by the Northwest Territories Lands and Resources Devolution Agreement.
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The motion is in order. To the principle of the bill.
