Thank you, Premier McLeod. Is committee agreed?
Agreed.
I would like to ask the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witnesses to the table.
Premier McLeod, for the record, please introduce your witness.
Thank you, Madam Chair. With me I have Michael Aumond, deputy minister of Finance. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Premier McLeod. Moving on with our general comments on the capital budget, Mr. Moses.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate the committee allowing me to make some general comments with regard to the budget.
First off, the whole budget process has proved quite interesting how it works. We heard some very strong comments yesterday by some of the Members on this side of the House. It got me thinking last night, when I was leaving the Assembly, that it is quite interesting how we get to this process in terms of budgeting. At one point during the fiscal year, we do see the budget ahead of us and we look at it, we break it down and give recommendations and it comes back to us. What gets me is how this budget ever gets to us from what Members have said in previous years. I know there are some new Members in this Assembly, but there are Members in this Assembly that have been here two, three, four, going on to their fifth years but yet things they have fought for have never gotten into the budget year after year. Yet, they continue to fight for them and I give them the respect and acknowledgement that they fight and can continue year after year. That is a pretty frustrating process to try to get what they need into the budget plan for their constituents.
I have been through that process two years myself, Madam Chair. I do feel when we do get a budget in front of us such as this, when I have had colleagues on this side of the House in their second and third terms that are frustrated not seeing whether this budget is going forward, but at the same time, as a new Member, I see where the fiscal responsibility comes in and how we have to be prudent where we spend the dollars.
It was a night of thinking on the whole budget and government operations and focusing on the Northwest Territories. You heard a lot here yesterday on how we have to provide services, roads, transportation, health centres and schools for the people of the Northwest Territories. You know, it is kind of a crazy thought thrown out there if you spent more time travelling in the Northwest Territories and doing more surveys and inspecting our schools and health centres and seeing what people in the Northwest Territories need, rather than going out and then trying to find out…maybe getting investments or creating partnerships that in years and years to come might not even show.
I know that the Premier and Cabinet have been doing a good job with the Canada Building Fund, working on trying to get some infrastructure with the federal government. But just thinking outside the box, as was said around the table a couple of times, just focus on our territory more and get our territory up and running.
There was an article in a newspaper – it might have been the Yellowknifer or on CBC North – about increasing our debt wall again by our Finance Minister, I believe. That was never spoken to. To read that, it was quite interesting. We now have an opportunity, with two years left, to start focusing on people in the Northwest Territories and our communities that the people live in.
We’re talking about devolution and we have to talk about getting our communities prepared for lease spacing for offices and for housing.
In terms of the budgeting process, I was really interested. I’m just going to take the operations budget, for example. I know we are on general comments, but the operations budget came before committee last year. We looked at it and we said no, we have to start investing in our people, prevention and promotion, early childhood development, treatment facilities. We put pressure on Housing. Housing did a good job with coming back. Education, income assistance. If we just approved that budget the way it was before us, where would the government be?
We have a good opportunity moving forward here. I don’t know who puts the budget together and brings it to us as legislators, but it is a concern and I believe Members on this side of the House have been doing a good job. I work with these guys every day that I’m here in Yellowknife and I know they do their reading. We have really concrete and detailed discussions in our committee meetings, and I do respect the Members who have been bringing up a lot of their constituency concerns. Not only constituency concerns, we have the Inuvik-Tuk highway and we did get a lot of support on this side of the House for that. I know there were some people who weren’t in favour of it, but at the end of the day, those discussions are laid out in committee rooms when we have a big project. Coming from a person who’s a new Member and somebody who has worked on many committees that did a lot of good work, I support all Members here who have been here in the past, moving forward with their projects. I know when they speak up in this House asking for something, that it’s legit and that we need to look at creating that.
Anyway, that was my budget talk and how budgets work in this government. I just wanted to get it off my chest, because last night I thought long and hard about it and I was just kind of bewildered on how the whole process works out and who brings the budget to us and moving it forward.
With the particular budget in front of us, you’ve heard a lot of people talking about a lot of different things yesterday. I’m not going to try to repeat any of it, but if I was going to repeat one thing, it would be the deferred maintenance. I think that’s one of the biggest issues we have in this government and it needs to be addressed.
In terms of the Inuvik and Beaufort-Delta side of things, I’m glad to see the fibre optic link is still proceeding. The Inuvik-Tuk highway, I know there was some discussion that was thrown out there, to try to make the project a little bit longer. Take some dollars out of the year and put into infrastructure. Coming from Inuvik and seeing the gas situation that I have, I won’t be able to support that. We need to get that project done on time, only because there are some wells that fall along that route that Inuvik and Tuk can tap into to get to a gas well and provide both communities with cheaper fuel costs. We need to get that infrastructure built in time so we can try and tap into that.
Another one, in speaking about highways, that’s just coming up with a plan for all highways in the highway system. I’d like to see where the update is on the Arctic Tern facility. With the new school, I know the new school was a big project of the last governments in Inuvik. But there were some minor things that had happened and one of them was with the dental office. Last year there were no students who got any dental work done because the dental therapist couldn’t do the work in the area, and the same thing is happening this year. So if there’s any way we could alter that dental office in the school so students are able to get the dental work done that they need. As government here knows, oral health care in the NWT is very high and very needed, and you’ve already lost out on the year with some of the students in Inuvik. It provides services to kindergarten to Grade 6 and that needs to be addressed.
I’d just like to thank Members for allowing me to vent a little bit about the budget process and also talk about some of the things that are going well, but also some of the things that also need to be addressed there.
I respect everybody that brings their concerns to the floor year after year after year, and hopefully we get to see some changes. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Moses. Premier McLeod.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I thank the Member for his comments. As we all know, the draft capital budget was presented to Members back in June of this year, so it was early in the process.
There have been a number of briefings on how the capital budget process actually works. We have a formula where all of the projects are run through and they’re ranked on a priority basis. Based on the amount of money that’s available, the highest priority projects are funded on that basis. For every project, there are five criteria that are used. One is the safety of people, the safety of assets, the environment, financial – whether there are other funding sources for the project, whether we’re talking 50 cent dollars or 30 cent dollars – and if this is for program and service enhancements. So all of those projects are run through that.
Also, there is what we call red flag projects. Those are the ones where a political decision has to be made in terms of whether there’s funding available. Essentially that’s how the capital planning process works.
We worked with the committees to come up with this proposed capital budget that we are discussing here today.
On the budget limit right now, we’ve talked about it but we recognize that if we’re going to do anything with regard to hydro, the budget limit will be something we’ll have to address.
Arctic Tern, that building is being fixed up by Public Works and it’s still to be determined what it’s to be used for. It’s identified as a surplus building.
With regard to dental, we’ll bring that to the Department of Education, Culture and Employment to see what we can do to address that. Thank you for those comments.
Thank you, Premier McLeod. Next on the list for general comments I have Mr. Menicoche.
Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The media was quick to pick up in the capital plan that there’s nothing for Yellowknife, and I’m glad.
---Laughter
Well, I’ve been at this table here for 10 years and finally the needs in the regions and communities have outstripped what’s going to be spent, most particularly for one fiscal year. But at the same time I’m not lost to the fact that inclusion of the Inuvik-Tuk highway has taken a lot of capital away from all regions. In fact, I think it’s like $70 million this coming fiscal year. So we have to keep in mind how many resources that takes away as we try to focus on the North.
At the same time, Members always say, well, it’s the first time we’ve seen this budget kind of approach. That’s not true and I think Mr. Premier pointed that out. We all work together on this budget. It’s a consensus-style government that we run. But it’s hard. It takes a long time for individual ridings or projects to come up. Sometimes regions get their special projects but you just have to be patient and hopefully eventually get yours, and I’m still waiting for mine, Madam Chair.
---Laughter
But it does take a lot of work. Most particularly I have been pounding on the table for Fort Simpson, to address the library concerns, and it’s finally made it in the budget but it took 10 years. So I thought I’d just share that with the Members. I’m pleased to see that.
As well, there are frustrations about ongoing projects such as the Trout Lake Airport. It should have had its opening this year but it may be deferred. But at the same time, we have to bear down and help manage these projects.
A stand-alone school in Trout Lake is a high priority for me and a high priority for the community of Trout Lake. We have some planning studies and hopefully we’ll work towards planning a new stand-alone school for Trout Lake.
Even though the bulk of the money is going to big projects, I’m pleased to see in Transportation that chipseal got a little bit extra money. Most particularly, I’d like to speak about the section from Providence junction on Highway No. 1 towards Fort Simpson. I drove it several times this summer and it’s deteriorating, and we’ve had to come up with a plan to alleviate that. We don’t want to lose infrastructure that’s already there and turn it back into gravel is what I’m trying to say. So in my opening comments I would urge that we work towards that.
As well, in terms of highways, we’re also looking at some expenditure of Highway No. 1 from Fort Simpson to Wrigley that’s very, very much needed. It’s been neglected for years and years, and I’m pleased to see some expenditure in that area as we move towards our long-term goal of the Mackenzie Highway as a permanent highway.
Just with that, I’ll continue my job and work with committees and work with the Ministers, and advance the priorities of my riding and ridings of other Members, as well, as we work towards it. But at the same time, people cannot get everything all the time. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Menicoche. Mr. Premier.
Thank you for those comments. I appreciate your perseverance. I think that the items in the budget, certainly Fort Simpson and I know the Trout Lake Airport has been worked on for some time. The Trout Lake School, as you know, there’s some planning money for it. The chipseal, obviously we wouldn’t want to see all that fine chipseal disappear, and we’ll talk to the department about that. I think we have some money for Highway No. 1. We were talking to industry about more investment in that area.
In the longer term, in talking with the federal government, they are very interested in what we’re talking about with regard to the Mackenzie Valley Highway. I think at some time in the future there will be more work done in those areas. Thank you for those comments.
Thank you, Premier McLeod. Any further general comments? Mr. Hawkins.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I’ll just quickly run through a few of them. Although a number of them have already been mentioned, it is certainly worth noting.
I have expressed over the years, 10 years certainly, the need for an expanded role for Aurora College and certainly for the Department of Education to respond to the need. Aurora College has, within themselves, outgrown their existing space here in Yellowknife. I’m certainly always pleased to hear Members like Mr. Menicoche talk about how they want to work with other Members to achieve our goals, too, so I look forward to him helping this project move forward, because it is a project that is good for everyone in the North. I appreciate that the olive branch is offered and I look forward to seeing that in action.
What I often hear people talk about, well, we worked together on this budget, and they talk about that. It usually tells me they already got what they wanted. It is when you don’t hear that you hear the opposite, that people have been struggling continually. I look forward to the day that the excuses end for why we don’t have a stand-alone Aurora College here in Yellowknife. I certainly think that we must be coming to the end of them. I mean, after 10 years they can’t keep coming up with new excuses. Mind you, they have recycled many of the old ones, which sort of dusted off does give them a polished, new look.
When I hear the Premier’s little list of why projects are done, I think we should add a sixth criteria: Are we failing our people? I certainly think we are failing our students by not allowing them a place to go. I think we are failing our educational institution. I think we are failing Northerners at large by not being prepared and investing properly in that. It is not like this has caught people off guard. This has been the same story, same arguments, same scenario for years, and yet it is always why we shouldn’t do it.
When I first started, back in 2003, Mildred Hall had begun its renovations. The former Member and, certainly, former Minister, who also represented Yellowknife Centre, was pleased to be involved in sort of getting it kicked off. I remember the launch of the semi-completed Mildred Hall renovation still called for many things to be done, and 10 years later they still need to be finished. We find that Mildred Hall, because they’ve spent some money, they continue to neglect its needs and necessities. Without the finished school look it’s never had, it is very difficult and challenging to encourage other students to come to that school. They always want to go to the new, big shiny school, and that school has never been given a fair launch. It has always, in my view, received half a renovation, and if you ask the administration, the students, the education board, they have always felt that as well.
Equally so, the J.H. Sissons School continues to be shuffled down the list. I look forward to the day when we actually hear that that is actually going to be a priority in this Assembly. The children and certainly the education system, I need not go at length, certainly would say are being not only disappointed but failed as well. It is a failing of this government that we continue to ignore these things. I don’t say that easily. I recognize that, like Mr. Menicoche’s Trout Lake community hall school – because it is not really a school; it is a community hall being taken over by students – it is not a shining example of where the education system should be heralded as doing a good job. It seemed like a stop-gap measure to deal with a problem, which I think was heroic in its own way, but it wasn’t meant to be the permanent solution by taking over the community hall. The system itself, as I said, maybe item seven under the list of criteria, should have been are we failing. I think we are.
Continuing on the theme of letting people down, addictions. It’s funny; a few years ago, I remember when Minister Lee was the Minister of Health and Social Services. She talked about getting rid of the territorial treatment centre that is on the Detah road. I thought, this must be a fantastic day, because if we don’t need a treatment centre, we must have cured all addiction ills. We should be trumpeting this day. We should be having ribbons, bands and balloons, because why would we be giving our addictions treatment centre away if the problem is still a problem? It turns out the problem still is a problem, but as we migrate forward on this issue, we lose another addictions treatment centre out of Hay River.
I think to myself, maybe there is a clever master plan I’m missing. Maybe the Minister has this amazing plan that he’s rolling out. He is just shuffling his deck just a certain way and maybe the cards haven’t rolled out the way I thought they would, maybe most Members thought they would. Maybe the public hasn’t seen the great plan provided by the Minister of Health on how we are going to tackle addictions. We continue to wait, but there continues to be no investment in dealing with these problems.
I’m not sure how much longer we need to keep asking for a treatment centre. I think Member Dolynny and certainly Member Moses have, as of late, been on this problem. I certainly welcome the work that they raise. I have often said, and I will stand by, that I will support a true addictions centre in the Northwest Territories wherever it is established, because if it is built properly to confront the ills before us, why would I find ways not to see it built? I even suggested at one time that if the Minister wanted to do something, in my view, innovative – there’s that innovation word again; it seems to get noted every day here – that he could build it on to the wing of the new Hay River Hospital. I would have no issue with that. I thought that would be an innovative way of doing this. We could plan accordingly, plan the beds for detox and plan the beds for maybe couples’ treatment, plan the facility for males one month or whatever it takes, then females the other couple of months, it doesn’t matter to me, but a residential type of treatment.
But, you know, innovation barely gets the light of day around here. If you are getting a sense I’m disappointed, I would say just go see my previous Member’s statements and you will understand why.
The Stanton Territorial Hospital is certainly a project that we all know that is well overdue. I would just hope that when that does finally show up, we have kicked that can so far down the road, there really isn’t any road left. That road could be described probably as Highway No. 7, if you’re looking for a good analogy. I look forward to all Members getting behind that particular project. I wish it was in this capital budget where we were spending the amount of money necessary to deal with that problem.
The plan is coming forward, and I certainly look forward to the plan with full detail to the public to show them where it’s going. I think it is a good plan and I certainly welcome that.
But I do have final notes. It was mentioned by Mr. Moses; I wasn’t going to mention it, but it was about Arctic Tern. The Premier said it has been identified for surplus. I know no one seems to really want that building. It doesn’t seem to be able to be put in a position for programming. I would suggest that we should offer it up to maybe a partnership between the Gwich’in and the Inuvialuit, to allow them to take it over for free. I think the territorial government built that building in error and they knew that at the time and that hasn’t changed. So what has changed is we have nothing in there, but we still own it. I would encourage the Gwich’in and certainly the Inuvialuit, although they have partnered on many things, to maybe look at this as a partnership opportunity to tackle some of the social needs that the Territories are burdened with, with maybe a new opportunity there.
I see that the GNWT should really walk away from this building and hand it over. If somebody could put a new life into it, a new spin to it, as the Premier said, it has been identified for surplus. What better way to work with our other governments at hand or other types of representatives who are equally concerned about people that we should walk away from this boondoggle of a building and see if they could put another opportunity, maybe a life, into it, inject it with something, but I would not want to see the territorial government to invest any more money in this building than they have to date. There is a time when you kind of say enough is enough. I think this is enough of this building. As I said earlier, this will be a chance for someone else to come in, and maybe they can put a new life into it. With that, Mr. Chair, it brings me to the end of my time, but not to the end of my time. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. We’ll go to Premier McLeod.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. With regard to the comments of the Member with regard to Aurora College, funds have been identified for ’15 and ’16 to do some planning on what this expanded role for Aurora College could be.
Another priority for our capital formula: Are we failing our people? We are always open to changing the process for the rating of projects, and certainly if that’s a recommendation coming from committee, I’m sure the government will be pleased to address that.
On Mildred Hall, the Department of Education has identified a need for renos to enhance the life of the assets and they are looking to identify funding, recognizing that there’s a lot of competition for scarce resources.
J.H. Sissons, there’s a planning study planned for this year to look at the problems or issues with J.H. Sissons.
An addictions centre, this Assembly, at the very beginning, all agreed we wouldn’t build any new addictions centres, that we would use existing facilities, and there are some plans being developed. This is an O and M issue, but after I make my comments I will ask Mr. Aumond to say a few words on that.
Stanton Territorial, there’s money identified for next year. As a government we are looking at how to approach it. We recognize that we would have to spend in the neighbourhood of $325 million to $400 million to address the Stanton Territorial renovations.
Arctic Tern, it’s a government surplus, and we are just doing work to maintain it and to see if any departments use it. If no department wants to use it, then we have a process for disposal of buildings. So, through you, Mr. Chair, I would like to ask Mr. Aumond to talk a bit about the addictions facilities.
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Aumond.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I guess the decision to shut down Nats’ejee K’eh was a result of the operations of Nats’ejee K’eh. It wasn’t related to the infrastructure of that facility. I believe that Health and Social Services, in response to the Minister’s Forum, will be looking to discuss with the Social Programs committee some alternate forms of delivery to treat addictions. That does not include a new treatment facility being constructed. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Aumond. Moving on with general comments we have Mrs. Groenewegen.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. What we have been hearing here this afternoon are, truly, general comments, not specific to this particular capital budget but very general. That’s a good discussion to have and I think it’s a good discussion to have in public, so that people can really kind of hear where we are coming from.
A few things I want to touch on, we talk about our infrastructure deficit here in the North and we talk about putting a few more millions of dollars, $50 million extra into the infrastructure capital budget. I don’t know how we compare to other jurisdictions, but might I be so bold as to suggest that for a jurisdiction such as ours and the number of people we have, that we have a lot of very, very good high-end infrastructure. Maybe we could be more easily compared to another territory, but I bet if you went into communities in northern Saskatchewan, northern Manitoba, northern Alberta, places like that, and you look at the infrastructure they have, I would say we are the infrastructure elite here in the Northwest Territories.
This building we are sitting in is an example of it. I objected when this building was built 20 years ago. I thought it was over the top. I thought meeting in the Explorer or the Yellowknife Inn was good enough. I kind of objected to it. Now that I’ve worked here for 18 years, I kind of like the place.
---Laughter
I made a bold statement back then when they commissioned this building, that if I was ever elected to this Legislature, I would pitch a tent in the backyard and protest for the government spending this many millions of dollars, but I’ve actually had my office indoors all this time.
I think we have to sometimes put things into perspective, you know. When we build things, we build them large, we build them grand. I mean the Inuvik school. I don’t know what the final number is, I don’t even want to say a number because who knows what the real number is, but we go into these projects maybe not with the most utility frame of mind. I am going to have the NWT Construction Association and the NWT Architects Association mad at me, I’m going to say that right off the bat, but we go into it with a very open mind and a very open chequebook. I don’t think when we’re building infrastructure like that, we’re thinking about ways to save money. I don’t think we’re thinking about energy efficiency for the operating costs as we go along. So when you see the disparity between that school and then some of he needs in some of the smaller communities where we haven’t got basic things, I question how we approach capital projects with such a basically unlimited budget. That bothers me.
I have said for years, I still think when the government builds stuff, it costs a lot more than when anybody else builds things. When the private sector goes to build something, they are very attuned to all those kinds of ways of getting the most value for money, getting the most energy efficient. The private sector would look at all those things. I don’t get the sense that our government looks at a lot of those things and it kind of bothers me.
I guess growing up in small town Ontario where the house I grew up in was 100 years old…The other thing that amazes me still is when we do spend these millions and millions on infrastructure, we don’t really build for the long term, it doesn’t seem. It seems like we are planning for a midlife retrofit or everything to all be changed in 20 or 30 years. Again, I don’t know. Maybe that’s what it is everywhere. Certainly if you go to Europe you’ll see some old buildings, but when we build buildings it doesn’t seem like we are planning for the long term. If we are going to spend all that money up front, let’s make sure they last a really long time, and I’m not sure that’s something that’s taken into consideration. Maybe it is and I just don’t know about it.
I think if we want to get more stuff on the ground, more projects on the ground, I think we need to really look at the purpose of the building and not be building monuments to somebody’s creativity, monuments to whatever local focus group came up with boutique kind of ideas for approaching capital projects.
One of the things that used to bother me a lot, too, and maybe we’ve gotten away from this now, is when we look at the soft cost of a project – and everybody has heard me say this before – do we have to reinvent all those soft costs and all those fees when we are designing or building things like community buildings or fire halls or things like that that are utility type things? Do we have to have all the design costs associated with that? Do we have to keep reinventing things like that? I think there are ways to do things, if we truly have an infrastructure deficit and we do want to get more infrastructure on the ground and more projects built in the communities where they need them, I think that we would not have things like the Inuvik school, if we really believed that. I think we could have done more projects for that total price tag of that school and given a few other communities a small, reasonably priced school and not put so much…The Inuvik school needed to be replaced. Sometimes infrastructure is worn out and it is not practical to fix it up, but sometimes – I am going to bring up the Hay River hospital – maybe doesn’t meet government standards but it’s still workable infrastructure for it to be used for something.
So I am really reluctant. An argument can be made to me to convince me, but I would be very surprised if that building doesn’t still have a useful life in it for something.
On the subject of Hay River, Mr. Menicoche was talking about how projects get into the capital plan and eventually come to fruition. So we lost the young offenders facility but we got the new assisted living facility, which was maybe altogether a $10 million project. That’s good. It’s up and operating and providing a useful purpose.
The midlife retrofit on the Diamond Jenness Secondary School, we made it under the wire with not having to replace that but being able to retrofit that. That was a $35 million project which just finished.
The new health care facility is another $65 million project, which was in the works for a long time and it is underway. It will probably be completed and operational in the lifetime of this Assembly.
The Health Minister has assured us for Hay River that we will have the replacement in some form of those 10 extended care, long-term care beds, that are currently in the Hay River hospital that are not going into the new facility.
There are new housing units that are on tap for Hay River as well. There’s the demolition and removal, disposal and removal of some public housing infrastructure and inventory and there’s replacement in the works.
So I would say that pretty much a lot of things that were in the works and in the planning and in the sights of MLAs like myself for many years have come to fruition in Hay River. I would say that there isn’t a lot of extra capital projects I am going to be fighting for in the next two years, so it is somebody else’s, it is another community’s turn to see that and we need to be fair in the distribution of those capital dollars as well.
I’m not saying the Ecole Boreale School couldn’t use a gymnasium and an addition if there was capital money available. We’d like to see that along with one of the French schools here in Yellowknife. But for the most part, a lot of the capital needs in Hay River have been addressed.
When we are looking at infrastructure, I just wish as a government we could look at it from the point of view…The Premier read off the six criteria, but also we need to look at its utility, its practicality, its longevity, its efficiency of operating in terms of the costs. There are a lot of things that we need to look at.
Those are my very general comments about how we acquire capital here in our jurisdiction. I don’t think we should ever lose sight of the fact that we have some pretty amazing infrastructure for a population of 42,000 spread over 33 communities. Thank you.
Thank you, Mrs. Groenewegen. Premier McLeod.
Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you for those comments. I agree with regard to our infrastructure. We should give ourselves an award in some cases. I think this is something that’s been around for a while, being held to a higher standard when we build buildings and other infrastructure. We would be very pleased to take the advice of the committee and find ways to be less grand while still fulfilling all of the Building Code requirements, safety standards and so on.
Most of our buildings, we amortize them over 40 years but most of them last longer than that. I think that the list of projects that you mentioned that we’re getting done, they have been on the books for a long time. It’s good to see that they are finally getting done. The Hay River hospital, I think it’s going to be a very welcome addition not only to Hay River but to the region as well.
The use of the old hospital, I guess that’s always a question whether it becomes one of safety or whether it would become more costly to maintain. If they were still in good shape, maybe the hospital could have been kept going longer, I’m not sure. It’s always iffy.
The Woodland Manor, I understand, going through the capital budget, that it’s slated for expansion.
I can’t comment on Ecole Scolaire because it’s in the courts.
The criteria, we are always looking to improve the way we rank projects, so if there were any suggestions, we would be willing to consider them. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Premier McLeod. That looks like it concludes my list of general comments. Is committee prepared to go into detail?
Agreed.
Agreed is what I am hearing. Before we begin, Premier McLeod.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to bring in a witness, with your approval.
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Does committee agree to bring witnesses into the Chamber?
Agreed.
Thank you, committee. Sergeant-at-Arms, if you could escort the witnesses in, thank you.
While we’re waiting for that, committee, the order of the proceedings have been predetermined today. We’re going to commence with Finance. So if you can go to section 3. We’ll be starting on section 3-2 in the 2014-2015 Capital Estimates, so if you can turn to those pages.
Premier, if you can introduce your witness to the House, please.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. On my right I have Mr. Dave Heffernen, chief information officer for the Government of the Northwest Territories. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Premier McLeod. Premier McLeod, do you have any opening comments?
I don’t have any opening comments, Mr. Chair. If we can just get right into it.
Does committee agree?
Agreed.
Committee, section 3-2 is a deferral, so if I can get you to turn now to section 3-4. Finance, activity summary, office of the comptroller general, infrastructure investment summary. Any questions?
Agreed.
Committee, if I can get you to turn page 3-6. Finance, activity summary, office of the chief information officer, infrastructure investment summary, information technology projects, $450,000. Does committee agree?
Agreed.
Agreed. If I can get committee to turn to page 3-2 for the department summary. Finance, department summary, infrastructure investment summary, information technology projects, $450,000. Does committee agree?
Agreed.
Thank you. Does committee agree we have concluded consideration of the Department of Finance?
Agreed.
Thank you, committee. I’d like to thank the witnesses. If I could get the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witnesses. The next area, committee, we’re going to be looking at is Human Resources, so if you can turn your attention to section 2-2 in your capital estimates binder. With that, we will go to the Minister for opening comments.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I don’t have any opening comments. They were made by the Minister of Finance yesterday.
Do you have any witnesses you’d like to bring into the Chamber?
Yes, I do, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Minister Abernethy. Does committee agree?
Agreed.
Thank you, committee. If I could get the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witnesses into the Chamber, thanks.
Minister Abernethy, if you could please introduce your witnesses to the House.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. With me today are Sheila Bassi-Kellett, the deputy minister of the Department of Human Resources; and Michelle Beard, who is the director of HR strategy and policy.
