Debates of June 2, 2015 (day 81)
QUESTION 863-17(5): SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSIONS ON CLIMATE CHANGE
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions today are for Mr. Ramsay, Minister Ramsay of ITI.
I would like to first ask if the Minister’s department agrees with the science on climate change. Mahsi.
Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Minister of Industry, Tourism and Investment, Mr. Ramsay.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would have to see the science the Member talks about. Thank you.
It’s of great concern if the Minister hasn’t seen the science on climate change. I think everybody in the world should see it, but probably not nearly as much as this Minister should.
Would the Minister commit to becoming intimately familiar with the scientific conclusions on climate change? Mahsi.
Having spent four years with MLA Bromley in the committee of EDI during the life of the last government, I did learn a lot about climate change. I want to thank him for that. If he was more specific about one publication or another, I am familiar with the science on climate change. But if he is specific about one piece of work or another, then I may be able to comment on that. As far as a blanket statement, I am not sure what the Member is getting at. Thank you.
Does the Minister of the department and the public support the permanent toxification or pollution of billions of litres of fresh water annually taken from our surface water in the NWT, polluted and stored forever, hopefully, safely underground? Mahsi.
Again, the Member is asking me some pretty leading questions and I take that question as notice. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Mr. Yakeleya.