Debates of October 17, 2014 (day 38)

Topics
Statements

QUESTION 394-17(5): ENERGY CHARRETTE

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to follow some of my colleagues today in talking about the cost of living. I’d like to start by asking the Premier about this new Energy Charrette that is being held. I’m not saying it’s a bad idea, but we had the first one that seemed to generate a fair amount of enthusiasm.

I would like to ask the Premier if he could articulate for us what we learned from the first Energy Charrette which actually resulted in some kind of a change in the direction that we were going or the way we do things that might have actually impacted the cost of living in the North because, in fact, energy is a huge part of that cost of living. Thank you.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mrs. Groenewegen. Honourable Premier, Mr. McLeod.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We learned a lot from the first Energy Charrette. We had a very good discussion and the outcomes of that was the Energy Action Plan, where this government invested more resources into reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. We came up with a 20-year vision for power production and basically it looked at joining up the two hydro zones by building transmission lines and also looking to have inter-ties with the South so we could access cheaper power, and as demand grows, we can expand our hydro facilities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

So it sounds like the first Energy Charrette, then, did produce some very positive results and some recommendations and some plans.

I would like to ask the Premier if we as a government are in a position financially to act on some of those long-range plans.

Has there already been action taken or is there some action to come that we can afford to undertake in the government? Thank you.

It was our government’s intention to look at finishing the costing of these transmission lines, and also, at the same time, we had approached the federal government to increase our borrowing limit by $1 billion.

Our costing has determined that the cost of building a transmission line to join the Taltson and Snare Hydro systems are prohibitive and it’s in the neighbourhood of almost 100 percent more than we had originally forecasted. In our view, those costs are too prohibitive to allow us to go ahead.

I think we feel with a second Energy Charrette we have to take a different approach whereby we make the consumers start to utilize more alternative and renewable forms of energy. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would like to ask the Premier if the recent statistics on the low water and the impact that had on our hydro production has caused any shift in the plan that was developed as a result of the Energy Charrette. Obviously, we don’t know how long this is going to continue to be a problem, but it might have resulted in some kind of correction to our plans going forward given the outcome of this past year’s water levels and hydro interruptions. Thank you.

Certainly the low water and prohibitive cost estimates for building transmission lines, we don’t know if this low water will continue. This is a first time ever, the lowest in 65 years. Generally, the hydro reservoirs are filled with water every year with the runoff from the spring, or the freshet as they call it. The annual rainfall this year for the three months of May, June, July, I think we had a thimbleful of rain. So I don’t know if this will be continuing on an ongoing basis, but certainly it made us recognize that we had to find a better way to reduce our reliance on hydro facilities in case it’s a permanent situation where going forward where the reservoirs won’t be refilled and we will have to look at alternatives where the consumers will have to become more independent and we will have to find a way to reduce our reliance on some of these facilities by having the Power Corporation buy excess power by individuals who generate their own power. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Final, short supplementary, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It sounds, from what the Premier is saying, that the focus of the second Energy Charrette is going to be away from the infrastructure more to breaking it down to the consumer.

Is the make-up or the composition of the people who will be participating in the second Energy Charrette going to reflect that shift in focus? Thank you.

That is our intention, and we hope that through the people who we invite and all the participants that will in fact be the case. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Speaker: MR. SPEAKER

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Member for Range Lake, Mr. Dolynny.