Robert Hawkins

Mr. Chairman, this may not be the time or place in the context of that level of detail, but I’m just trying to understand if it’s a year-by-year agreement, what are we actually negotiating or renewing if it sounds like it automatically renews at a flat escalator of 2 percent? I mean, I’m just trying to understand what are we renewing. Thank you.

I appreciate that answer but, with all due respect, I think that’s an issue of semantics where we’re saying something similar. Ultimately, I think that it goes back to the question why are they funding us that particular case and on what basis are they funding us that particular case? Thank you.

Thank you for clarifying which page my specific question would be on. Seeing how it is related, I’d like to continue. What is the present formula that causes us to get $21 million for that type of care in this particular budget cycle? What type of inflationary factors are built in? As I understand it, the territorial government services cost more than we’re being paid. In other words, did we put in a particular figure and did the federal government respond with a particular figure and, of course, what would that figure be? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Under revenue summary, I’m just curious as to finding out what particular money is built into this bottom line here that emphasizes the money paid to us through our NIHB figures. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, with the budget before us some things sort of pop out and I’m certainly pleased to see the evolution of our downtown clinic. Through this budget it will help support that. Our budget also supports the soon to be opening dementia centre, which is excellent news and I think it is a step forward in the treatment of people with this chronic ailment. It’s certainly a good thing to see that we have a facility that’s up to date with an appropriate way of helping people through this problem. The day shelter, there will be funding for the day shelter or drop-in...

Thank you considerably for that excellent answer. That’s the type of information I was trying to get at: what do we provide for weight loss assistance or support for people with diabetes? Again, this is one of the areas a constituent of mine has been denied on the basis that it would be offered locally. I’d like to know what area that that would be new for this coming year. Thank you.

Mr. Speaker, I can appreciate the willingness or the lack of willingness that the Minister shows interest on this particular issue beyond the fact he turns around and says I understand the concern, but I am sure $250 makes people worry. Well, Mr. Speaker, it is about upping the ante and sending the correct message that needs to be sent, Mr. Speaker. All we have to do is have the ticket submitted to our process, change a regulation so it reflects that. Mr. Speaker, would the Minister show some national leadership on this particular issue and step forward and say we will see if we could find a...

Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the deputy minister reading out the flow chart, but what would be new in the sense of developments and new programming and treatment for diabetes for this year? Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In my Member’s statement today I talked about my concern and, may I add, my disgust about people who park in handicapped parking who do not have the appropriate placard to be there. I would like to ask questions to the Minister of Transportation to see if the department would be willing to take a lead on this type of initiative to demonstrate its position as well as lend its voice to the fact that this is a wrong we should help correct by enforcing this not stricter but with a clear message.

Mr. Speaker, to the Minister of Transportation: would he be willing to...

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Under the primary care division, would this be the area that is under the program delivery that would cite areas for diabetes care and treatment? Thank you.